Anyone? Anyone?

[Comshaw]

Does anyone believe anything reported by Fox news, when you're caught talking out of both sides of your mouth, saying one thing in private, then reporting a completely different story on air? So in essence it wasn't "News" that was being reported, but propaganda to bolster their rating by uphold Trump's wild and irrational style. I know for certain that those who wanted to believe what was reported by Fox, still believe it even when the facts have smacked them in the face. I'm getting to the point I am no longer angry with their denial, no longer wonder at how one can still support such people or positions. I'm just sad and sorry for them. But I am disgusted with people like Tucker and Sean Hannity. For nothing more then money and power they would tear a country apart. Trump couldn't be where he is, do the harm he did with his lies without support from people like these two. We all have our hot buttons, things that bother us. One of mine is the lack of honor in an individual. Neither one of these scum buckets have any.

Tucker Carlson Calls Trump ‘Demonic Force’ in New Legal Filing

 

[Lazaran]

Does anyone believe anything reported by Fox news, when you're caught talking out of both sides of your mouth, saying one thing in private, then reporting a completely different story on air? So in essence it wasn't "News" that was being reported, but propaganda to bolster their rating by uphold Trump's wild and irrational style. I know for certain that those who wanted to believe what was reported by Fox, still believe it even when the facts have smacked them in the face. I'm getting to the point I am no longer angry with their denial, no longer wonder at how one can still support such people or positions. I'm just sad and sorry for them. But I am disgusted with people like Tucker and Sean Hannity. For nothing more then money and power they would tear a country apart. Trump couldn't be where he is, do the harm he did with his lies without support from people like these two. We all have our hot buttons, things that bother us. One of mine is the lack of honor in an individual. Neither one of these scum buckets have any.

Tucker Carlson Calls Trump ‘Demonic Force’ in New Legal Filing

You are obviously asking “members” of the RWCJ.

I predict *crickets*.

RWCJ

 

[ll74]

Rule of thumb on "news" stories -

1. Can you corroborate the story?
a. And this means a site that doesn't copy the same content word for word
2. Is this an opinion piece or actual news?
3. If this article is referring to an external source of material, does it offer a link to the original source content? (If they trust their own perspective, they should provide a link to the source without issue so you can see the data for yourself)

 

[jaF0]

https://forum.literotica.com/threads/the-nickname-faux-news-seems-to-be-more-true-than-not.1582892/

 

[adrina]

The ironic thing is that the RWCJ doesn't trust Fox News anymore because they don't lie enough.

 

[Lazaran]

The ironic thing is that the RWCJ doesn't trust Fox News anymore because they don't lie enough.

Ain’t that ^ the “truth”.

RWCJ

 

[ishtat]

In 1957 the Reporter/News Editor of the Adelaide Advertizer ran a campaign to refute the allegation that the atmospheric nuclear tests carried out in South Australia from 1954- 56 had adversely affected with radiation approximately 100 desert Aborigines. It had been alleged that the government had made no attempt to contact and move these tribes people before the tests. The Advertizer ran photographs to 'prove' that these "happy stone age people" were doing just fine.

It was several years before it emerged that all the "happy" photographs had been taken years before any tests. But by then not too many of the affected aborigines had survived to complain. Neither the Advertizer nor its young journalist, one Rupert Murdoch, apologised.

Not much change in almost 70 years!

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Does anyone believe anything reported by Fox news, when you're caught talking out of both sides of your mouth, saying one thing in private, then reporting a completely different story on air? So in essence it wasn't "News" that was being reported, but propaganda to bolster their rating by uphold Trump's wild and irrational style. I know for certain that those who wanted to believe what was reported by Fox, still believe it even when the facts have smacked them in the face. I'm getting to the point I am no longer angry with their denial, no longer wonder at how one can still support such people or positions. I'm just sad and sorry for them. But I am disgusted with people like Tucker and Sean Hannity. For nothing more then money and power they would tear a country apart. Trump couldn't be where he is, do the harm he did with his lies without support from people like these two. We all have our hot buttons, things that bother us. One of mine is the lack of honor in an individual. Neither one of these scum buckets have any.

Tucker Carlson Calls Trump ‘Demonic Force’ in New Legal Filing

Fox News ends at 6 pm, after that it is opinion shows.

 

[Comshaw]

Fox News ends at 6 pm, after that it is opinion shows.

Doesn't fucking matter. Opinions should be based on fact. It's even more egregious when the one express's an opinion on air in agreement with a given subject, then denigrates that same subject in private. Yeah, "I'll shoot my fucking mouth off for money and viewers but I don't believe a damned word of it!" Can anyone say SLIMY?

Comshaw

 

[Bray123]

But it's freedumb of speech!!!

It's not 'shouting fire in a theatre' if you're in the theatre of politics and all you're trying to do is overturn democracy in the US (and sell adverts). According to Faux lawyers.

 

[Pad_Foot]

They say they are not news. Not the Press. So, not Freedom therein
S e d I t I on

Worse yellow journalism than Hearst
Revoke his citizenship
Send Murdoch home penny-less

 

[icanhelp1]

Doesn't fucking matter. Opinions should be based on fact. It's even more egregious when the one express's an opinion on air in agreement with a given subject, then denigrates that same subject in private. Yeah, "I'll shoot my fucking mouth off for money and viewers but I don't believe a damned word of it!" Can anyone say SLIMY?

Comshaw

OK! NOW do MSNBC or CNN or maybe NYTs or WAPO or HUFF or NPR.

 

[icanhelp1]

In 1957 the Reporter/News Editor of the Adelaide Advertizer ran a campaign to refute the allegation that the atmospheric nuclear tests carried out in South Australia from 1954- 56 had adversely affected with radiation approximately 100 desert Aborigines. It had been alleged that the government had made no attempt to contact and move these tribes people before the tests. The Advertizer ran photographs to 'prove' that these "happy stone age people" were doing just fine.

It was several years before it emerged that all the "happy" photographs had been taken years before any tests. But by then not too many of the affected aborigines had survived to complain. Neither the Advertizer nor its young journalist, one Rupert Murdoch, apologised.

Not much change in almost 70 years!

And NYTs ran interference for Hitler during the "HOLOCAUST" PICK YOUR POISON!!

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Fox News ends at 6 pm, after that it is opinion shows.

Doesn't fucking matter. Opinions should be based on fact. It's even more egregious when the one express's an opinion on air in agreement with a given subject, then denigrates that same subject in private. Yeah, "I'll shoot my fucking mouth off for money and viewers but I don't believe a damned word of it!" Can anyone say SLIMY?

Comshaw

OK! NOW do MSNBC or CNN or maybe NYTs or WAPO or HUFF or N

Will you STFU! I'm watching fox news.

It writes it self!!! *chuckles*

 

[adrina]

It writes it self!!! *chuckles*

The crazy thing about that hysterical diatribe from them above is that they are just continuing to display the problem with all Fox et al viewers - the high levels of mis- and disinformation paired with the low levels of knowledge about current events.

 

[JohnEngelman]

I enjoy investigating different points of view, for me press bias is not an issue. I assume that reporters have different values and concerns, and that these effect the way they report the news.

What I demand is press honesty. The lies of Rush Limbaugh have been documented since 1994.

https://fair.org/home/the-way-things-arent/

 

[Comshaw]

It writes it self!!! *chuckles*

I rarely see what the intelligent deficit person you quoted says. Sometimes though (like now) I click on a post to make sure I was correct to put them on ignore. So let me paraphrase its argument...


But, but, but MSNBC or CNN or maybe NYTs or WAPO or HUFF or N !! Proof they have done the same? Any at all? I will be happy to listen to any reliable substantiated proof you have. And I will express the same opinion about those you named IF you can prove they did the same.

What I won't listen to is bullshit innuendo, WAGS or anything claimed that has no substantial backing. As far as what Fox did, it didn't come from the libs, IT CAME FROM THEIR OWN FUCKING MOUTHS! So are you now gunna' call those whom you swear speak the gospel on air, liars? And monkeys will fly out of my butt too.

As far as the NYT running interference for Hitler, those in charge of the paper at that time should have been taken to task for it. Do you agree? If you do then you should also agree that Fox channel's talking heads need to be taken to task for what they did. Or you can keep right on talking out of both sides of your mouth. I know which it will be.


Comshaw

 

[ll74]

Doesn't fucking matter. Opinions should be based on fact. It's even more egregious when the one express's an opinion on air in agreement with a given subject, then denigrates that same subject in private. Yeah, "I'll shoot my fucking mouth off for money and viewers but I don't believe a damned word of it!" Can anyone say SLIMY?

Comshaw

Opinion pieces are based on speculation most of the time, which is typically partially based on fact. The majority of "news" is this type, no matter the source.

This is why corroboration of content has become vital in discerning actual news in modern times.

 

[jaF0]

A crowd of people witness a traffic accident from a variety of angles. As they're questioned, their stories all vary just a bit. Those are opinions.

But one guy says he though he heard a plane fly overhead and wonders if maybe it dropped something that distracted one of the drivers. There is no evidence of such, no one else makes any similar clams and the FAA determines no aircraft were in the area. But FAUX news grabs that little tidbit of nothingness and runs with it stating 'factually' that a Cuban plane invaded US Airspace and attacked civilian traffic on the ground.

 

[icanhelp1]

I enjoy investigating different points of view, for me press bias is not an issue. I assume that reporters have different values and concerns, and that these effect the way they report the news.

What I demand is press honesty. The lies of Rush Limbaugh have been documented since 1994.

https://fair.org/home/the-way-things-arent/

I rarely see what the intelligent deficit person you quoted says. Sometimes though (like now) I click on a post to make sure I was correct to put them on ignore. So let me paraphrase its argument...


But, but, but MSNBC or CNN or maybe NYTs or WAPO or HUFF or N !! Proof they have done the same? Any at all? I will be happy to listen to any reliable substantiated proof you have. And I will express the same opinion about those you named IF you can prove they did the same.

What I won't listen to is bullshit innuendo, WAGS or anything claimed that has no substantial backing. As far as what Fox did, it didn't come from the libs, IT CAME FROM THEIR OWN FUCKING MOUTHS! So are you now gunna' call those whom you swear speak the gospel on air, liars? And monkeys will fly out of my butt too.

As far as the NYT running interference for Hitler, those in charge of the paper at that time should have been taken to task for it. Do you agree? If you do then you should also agree that Fox channel's talking heads need to be taken to task for what they did. Or you can keep right on talking out of both sides of your mouth. I know which it will be.

Ignore is a function used by cowards. Insulting someone behind their back is intellectually dishonest and slimy. Speaking pejoratively of a individual in the third person is equally cowardly and slimy. I've never put anyone on ignore. I will of course ignore people who do nothing more than spew argumentum using ad-hominem to support an argument.

Egocentricity and narcissism are not positive traits.

Providing supporting documentation that does not pander to leftist ideology is immediately denounced as biased and right wing Trumpian garbage. Lit's PB consist mostly of left wing zealots so obviously demonstrated by the reaction to your post. The minute a conservative post appears on PB you can just hear the background noise of google buttons searching for any minute factoid to disprove the posting usually commingled with ad-hom.

I'm sure you'll enjoy your mutual admiration society, *the BRO CAV* CERTAINLY STEPPED UP TO THE PLATE FOR YA! Your narrative gave them purpose and they *WILL* run off a cliff for you. The lack of opposing viewpoints to your narrative doesn't make it right, it just makes it.

Your writing style in this instance was an obvious attempt to disarm any attempt at an opposing viewpoint. Your thinly veiled attempt at neutrality is laughable on its face. Five years of leftist badgering of a fledgling Trump administration, DNC's unethical behavior, maniacal attempts at a soft coup by unprecedented impeachment attempts* KNOWING FULL WELL THEY WOULD FAIL*, weaponizing major institutions like the FBI and the DOJ loyal to Obama against Trump out of pure hatred *set the foundation for the divisions that exist in our country today*. THE LEFT DID THEN AND IS STILL TRYING TODAY TO MINIMIZE IF NOT COMPLETELY ELIMINATE CONSERVATIVE THOUGHT.

From 2016 till 2020 CNN, MSNBC, NYTs and big tech media promoted lie after lie about Russian collusion, riots as peaceful, FBI and FISC fraud, Steele dossier, farcical Sussmann trial in a DC court and on and on while you pick Carlson, Hannity as the hill to die on, interesting. Your willingness to look in the other direction is testament to your lack of objectivity. Your loathing towards Carlson and Hannity, is, in your mind justifiable, what's not justifiable is your limited target set.

Laz’s perfect world:
Unless America votes Pragmatic Progressive Democrats into a permanent super majority in the Senate / House and reshapes the SCOTUS, along with a Pragmatic Progressive Democratic President, Government is NEVER going to “FIX THE PROBLEM”

 

[ll74]

Ignore is a function used by cowards.

Bullshit. If someone came up to you at a restaurant during dinner and started talking politics, you would ignore them or possibly reported them to the staff. Putting up with someone's bullshit or not putting up with it doesn't stop it from being bullshit. It just means you don't have to deal with their bullshit.

Whether you want to subject yourself to things that are a waste of time or not isn't the badge of honor you believe it to be.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Ignore is a function used by cowards. Insulting someone behind their back is intellectually dishonest and slimy. Speaking pejoratively of a individual in the third person is equally cowardly and slimy. I've never put anyone on ignore. I will of course ignore people who do nothing more than spew argumentum using ad-hominem to support an argument.

Egocentricity and narcissism are not positive traits.

Providing supporting documentation that does not pander to leftist ideology is immediately denounced as biased and right wing Trumpian garbage. Lit's PB consist mostly of left wing zealots so obviously demonstrated by the reaction to your post. The minute a conservative post appears on PB you can just hear the background noise of google buttons searching for any minute factoid to disprove the posting usually commingled with ad-hom.

I'm sure you'll enjoy your mutual admiration society, *the BRO CAV* CERTAINLY STEPPED UP TO THE PLATE FOR YA! Your narrative gave them purpose and they *WILL* run off a cliff for you. The lack of opposing viewpoints to your narrative doesn't make it right, it just makes it.

Your writing style in this instance was an obvious attempt to disarm any attempt at an opposing viewpoint. Your thinly veiled attempt at neutrality is laughable on its face. Five years of leftist badgering of a fledgling Trump administration, DNC's unethical behavior, maniacal attempts at a soft coup by unprecedented impeachment attempts* KNOWING FULL WELL THEY WOULD FAIL*, weaponizing major institutions like the FBI and the DOJ loyal to Obama against Trump out of pure hatred *set the foundation for the divisions that exist in our country today*. THE LEFT DID THEN AND IS STILL TRYING TODAY TO MINIMIZE IF NOT COMPLETELY ELIMINATE CONSERVATIVE THOUGHT.

From 2016 till 2020 CNN, MSNBC, NYTs and big tech media promoted lie after lie about Russian collusion, riots as peaceful, FBI and FISC fraud, Steele dossier, farcical Sussmann trial in a DC court and on and on while you pick Carlson, Hannity as the hill to die on, interesting. Your willingness to look in the other direction is testament to your lack of objectivity. Your loathing towards Carlson and Hannity, is, in your mind justifiable, what's not justifiable is your limited target set.

Laz’s perfect world:
Unless America votes Pragmatic Progressive Democrats into a permanent super majority in the Senate / House and reshapes the SCOTUS, along with a Pragmatic Progressive Democratic President, Government is NEVER going to “FIX THE PROBLEM”

You could have just said you have nothing of importance to say, potato brain. All those words and nothing to say.

 

[adrina]

You could have just said you have nothing of importance to say, potato brain. All those words and nothing to say.

Yeah but that wouldn't be hysterical now would it.

 

[urguyscott]

I believe CNN. They said that all women,including the democrats are over their prime and worthless. That includes those in Congress and on their network. Also when Biden shot himself in the foot by shooting down our own balloons in order to show his boss in China how tough he is I believed MSNBC and the other great medias on how strong our great leader is. When they said that the democrats were green and worried about polluting the world and that the sky would catch fire if Gore and his bunch didn't fly in private jets all over the world I know they were right. To hell with the people of PA and OH. The rhino's and democrats aren't afraid to drink the water there or eat the food grown there and the fish. CNN and MSNBC, ABC, and CBS insured us with the Sect. of Transportation, he is so qualified for his job according to these sources, that it is safe. Of course I believe them and will cheer when Biden and company drink the kool aid, I mean the water. Nor were AOC or any other "greens" complaining about the harm to the environment. After all gas stoves are more danger as reported by the leftist media except as AOC says except hers as she "rent's and that is also different just like the over the prime Gov. of NY says hers is. So no I don't listen to FOXX because they might convince me that the communists media is lying to us. The last thing brain washed socialist want is the truth. So down with FOXX.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Ignore is a function used by cowards. Insulting someone behind their back is intellectually dishonest and slimy. Speaking pejoratively of a individual in the third person is equally cowardly and slimy. I've never put anyone on ignore. I will of course ignore people who do nothing more than spew argumentum using ad-hominem to support an argument.

LOL and those who constantly show when and where your wrong......*chuckles*

Egocentricity and narcissism are not positive traits.

LOL then why do you support and constantly praise the most egocentric and narcissistic person to ever hold the office of president?

Providing supporting documentation that does not pander to leftist ideology is immediately denounced as biased and right wing Trumpian garbage. Lit's PB consist mostly of left wing zealots so obviously demonstrated by the reaction to your post. The minute a conservative post appears on PB you can just hear the background noise of google buttons searching for any minute factoid to disprove the posting usually commingled with ad-hom.

Not true from my perspective. I'll admit though I don't the stupid RWCJ nicely. But they do have to earn that designation....but once they have joined in the RWCJ...

From 2016 till 2020 CNN, MSNBC, NYTs and big tech media promoted lie after lie about Russian collusion

It wasn't a lie....*chuckles* Even the Republican authored Senate report states that........fuck your soooooooo stupid!!!!!

Laz’s perfect world:
Unless America votes Pragmatic Progressive Democrats into a permanent super majority in the Senate / House and reshapes the SCOTUS, along with a Pragmatic Progressive Democratic President, Government is NEVER going to “FIX THE PROBLEM”

Poor ican't.......always the victim...

.https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-election