Another glorious victory for FEMINISM! Michelle Carter gets only 2.5 years

LJ_Reloaded

バクスター の
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
21,217
for encouraging her boyfriend to commit suicide.

Had this been a boy who did this at the age she did it, he would have been tried as an adult and thrown in the hole for at least TWICE as long.
 
for encouraging her boyfriend to commit suicide.

Had this been a boy who did this at the age she did it, he would have been tried as an adult and thrown in the hole for at least TWICE as long.

Was that a cause feminists or anyone was advocating for?
 
Was that a cause feminists or anyone was advocating for?
Feminism by nature supports women getting lower sentences than men for the same crime.

Badbabysitter herself said this was acceptable because men commit more crimes than women do. Mind you of course this is the same reasoning they use for giving black people stiffer sentences but she was too scared to answer me on that point.
 
Feminism by nature supports women getting lower sentences than men for the same crime.

Badbabysitter herself said this was acceptable because men commit more crimes than women do. Mind you of course this is the same reasoning they use for giving black people stiffer sentences but she was too scared to answer me on that point.

Did anyone advocate this young lady get less time?
 
And another one of your friends, Sean Renaud, also defended women getting lower sentences than men for the same crime:

And yeah guys are violent.

Same defense as badbabysitter made.
 
Did anyone advocate this young lady get less time?
No one needed to advocate this one woman getting less time.

As I've just shown, feminists have generally stated women deserve to get less time than men for the same crime. So your question has been answered.

Next question. This one will not be visited again.
 
We know that's true, judge would have thrown the book at a dude.

That bitch has a huge forehead. She looks like Jason Voorhies. She should have been thrown under the jail.
 
No one needed to advocate this one woman getting less time.

As I've just shown, feminists have generally stated women deserve to get less time than men for the same crime. So your question has been answered.

Next question. This one will not be visited again.

LOL!!
 
Should never have been charged at all. N o criminal case.

Civil? Well, that's a different bowl of succotash.
 
We know that's true, judge would have thrown the book at a dude.

That bitch has a huge forehead. She looks like Jason Voorhies. She should have been thrown under the jail.
Indeed, had it been a man who got 2.5 years for doing this to a woman we would see 5,000 news articles about how this is another example of muh soggy knees.

SgtSpiderMan knows that. He's just too cuckold chickenshit to admit it.
 
Another shit stain trolling post.
Get over yourself, there are other opinions out there in the world.
You must be a progressive aligned with the snowflake crowd as you seem totally incapable of accepting that fact.
 
LJ is just someone who visits us from time to time, when he forgets to take his meds.
 
Another shit stain trolling post.
Get over yourself, there are other opinions out there in the world.
You must be a progressive aligned with the snowflake crowd as you seem totally incapable of accepting that fact.

Not everyone who despises conservative dingbats is a progressive, you dumb ass. And conservatives are the biggest whiniest snowflakes.
 
Feminism by nature supports women getting lower sentences than men for the same crime.

Badbabysitter herself said this was acceptable because men commit more crimes than women do. Mind you of course this is the same reasoning they use for giving black people stiffer sentences but she was too scared to answer me on that point.

No it doesn't.
Something one person may have said to you is not 'feminism'.
Where is your actual evidence for this statement. By 'evidence', I mean a clear theoretical argument made from the perspective of feminism that men should receive higher sentences for the same crimes than women - not random isolated incidents of this (putatively) happening and feminists not doing anything about it. Because THAT is not the same as the bolded claim made by you above.
 
No it doesn't.
Something one person may have said to you is not 'feminism'.
Where is your actual evidence for this statement. By 'evidence', I mean a clear theoretical argument made from the perspective of feminism that men should receive higher sentences for the same crimes than women - not random isolated incidents of this (putatively) happening and feminists not doing anything about it. Because THAT is not the same as the bolded claim made by you above.

True... true...
 
for encouraging her boyfriend to commit suicide.

Had this been a boy who did this at the age she did it, he would have been tried as an adult and thrown in the hole for at least TWICE as long.

Also, I'd be interested to see some evidence to support this statement. Possibly it's true, but if that's the case, I'd expect there'd be some easily located and entirely clear cases where this had happened. And NO cases where a man in a similar position had received the same (or lesser) sentence as Carter did here. Of course, you have all this to hand, given that you're so confident in the statement you're making.
 
Also, I'd be interested to see some evidence to support this statement. Possibly it's true, but if that's the case, I'd expect there'd be some easily located and entirely clear cases where this had happened. And NO cases where a man in a similar position had received the same (or lesser) sentence as Carter did here. Of course, you have all this to hand, given that you're so confident in the statement you're making.
Gender disparity in sentencing, which favors women, is a well known statistical fact.

https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx
 

Not everyone who despises conservative dingbats is a progressive, you dumb ass. And conservatives are the biggest whiniest snowflakes.

No, Snowflake is the designation reserved for progressives ( actual meaning is fascists ) that are Bernie sympathizers who would still vote for cunt Clinton. Usually under 30, and do not recognize reality even when it hits them between the eyes. Hence, returning to live with mum in her basement.

As far as dingbats and dumb asses go, you seem to have handily embraced both. I know, I know, they just followed you since high school. :rolleyes:
 
No it doesn't.
Something one person may have said to you is not 'feminism'.
B-b-b-bbut Not All Feminists Are Like That!

Get lost. If "Not all men" is unhelpful in feminists' eyes than NAFALT is a non-starter, too.

Where is your actual evidence for this statement. By 'evidence', I mean a clear theoretical argument made from the perspective of feminism that men should receive higher sentences for the same crimes than women - not random isolated incidents of this (putatively) happening and feminists not doing anything about it.
Feminists' inaction makes them guilty of supporting it. Just like when feminists jump on men for "supporting misogyny" by not fighting sexism at every possible turn. Again, feminism has a pattern of never doing anything, ever, to fight discrimination that favors women.

You movement is bound by its own rules.
 
And it's also not evidence for your statement that sentencing disparities (which I'm not necessarily accepting as fact)
Sentencing disparities favoring women is an established fact by university/government studies. That you don't accept it basically means you can't accept facts.

is about feminism
Just as men are held responsible for "failing" to stop rapists, feminists are guilty by their strict and universal inaction against sexism that favors women, and their dishonest claim that "misogyny" causes "benevolent" sexism.

Sexism that favors women is entirely because women made it so. Feminists have declared that violence is a gendered issue. You're a part of why women get lower sentences - after all you are one of the many feminists that floats that fraudulent "hegemonic/toxic masculinity" narrative.

Feminists like the Duluth Model project have said domestic violence against men is a trivial issue. Source: https://www.theduluthmodel.org/what-is-the-duluth-model/frequently-asked-questions/

Countless feminist groups have said domestic violence is a gendered thing, such as:
https://www.womensaid.org.uk/inform...tic-abuse/domestic-abuse-is-a-gendered-crime/

So it's no wonder why Michelle Carter got only 2.5 years for this act of domestic violence. Feminists have said women don't do this, or it's a trivial thing, and it's gendered (aka only men do it).

Yet meanwhile rape occurs in 30% of lesbian relationships:
http://www.pandys.org/articles/lesbiandomesticviolence.html

And lesbian partner violence is proportionally more prevalent than male vs female violence, and feminism's "gendered" narrative helps abusive women hunt down their victims in women's shelters with ease.
http://everydayfeminism.com/2014/11/myths-ipv-lesbian-relationships/

So basically your misandry is not only the cause of people like Michelle Carter getting lower sentences than men for the same crime, but your belief system is also hurting women who are victims of other women.

Misandry hurts women.

You've got nothing else to say here. You will be disregarded from this point on. Keep destroying feminism's credibility for all I care.
 
Back
Top