Another book for the GWB Presidential Library

shereads

Sloganless
Joined
Jun 6, 2003
Posts
19,242
Books by White House insiders with serious accusations against the Bush/Cheney administration seem to be hitting the shelves at an unprecedented rate. This week, it's "The Politics of Truth" by a man Bush 1 once called "an American hero."

The good news? Still no sex scandals!

At least this White House can take pride in its pristine moral standard.

---------------------

I Accuse.

Joseph Wilson, author of "The Politics of Truth," talks about his prime suspect in the White House smear campaign against him and his wife.

by Joe Conasan {salon.com}

May 3, 2004 _|_ After serving in the American diplomatic corps for more than two decades, Joseph Wilson had retired from the Foreign Service in 1998 to enjoy his new family and pursue a second career as an international businessman. In February 2002, his government called on him to undertake a sensitive mission to the West African nation of Niger, which had allegedly agreed to ship uranium to Saddam Hussein's Iraq. He quickly agreed to handle the task without pay or credit.

When he boarded the plane for Niger, Wilson could not have imagined how profoundly that trip would change his life and that of his wife, Valerie Plame -- nor how its consequences would disgrace the Bush administration, whose retaliatory actions against Wilson and Plame are still under investigation by a Justice Department special counsel.

He knew firsthand that the 16 infamous words in the president's 2003 State of the Union address -- "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa" -- were false. He refused to remain silent as the nation was misled into war.

In his candid new memoir, "The Politics of Truth," Wilson tells the story of that episode in great detail, but he also reveals himself as a moderate man driven to battle with extremists and liars. Growing up in a conservative Republican family in California, he rose to ambassadorial posts through merit and hard work, not as a political appointee.

Always more interested in policy than politics, Wilson served both Democratic and Republican administrations in various diplomatic posts throughout Africa, and eventually as ambassador to Gabon in West Africa. Before his clash with the White House, Wilson's most difficult test had come during Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990, when he was acting ambassador to Baghdad. His courage and resourcefulness in confronting Saddam and protecting the Americans under his care elicited the highest praise from his superiors -- including the first President Bush, who called Wilson "a true American hero."

Wilson would live to hear himself portrayed quite differently by Republican attackers after his break with the White House. They called him a "playboy" and an "asshole," and denigrated his diplomatic record. While those personal attacks were obnoxious, what astonished Wilson was the decision by senior administration officials to expose Plame, who worked undercover for the CIA to stem the spread of weapons of mass destruction around the world. Now he strikes back in a book that urges his fellow citizens to defend democracy against the unscrupulous officials who placed their own political power above the nation's security.

Conason: As your new book comes out, the Justice Department investigation of what I no longer hesitate to call the conspiracy against your wife seems to be in a hiatus. Can you talk about what's going on with the investigation? Do you know?

Wilson: First of all, I think you're absolutely right that it's appropriate to call this a conspiracy, by people very close to the center of power in the United States, who decided that their political agenda was more important than the national security of the country. Now with respect to the investigation, I don't know, but I will say that I have absolute confidence in the seriousness of purpose and the efforts of both the special counsel, Patrick Fitzgerald, and the FBI team that is working with him.

What is appalling to me in all of this is that the president said early on that he wanted to get to the bottom of this -- and yet the people who work for the president did not heed his call and step forward. Instead they're stonewalling, and appear ready to stonewall against his instructions indefinitely. Either he didn't mean what he said, or else he doesn't have authority over his senior staff, or they're simply insubordinate.

Complete article is at http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/05/03/wilson/index_np.html
 
Excerpts:

Conason: <snip> You write, "The man attacking my integrity and reputation -- and I believe, quite possibly the person who exposed my wife's identity -- was Scooter Libby," the vice president's chief of staff. What makes you suspect Libby?

Wilson:<snip> The most plausible scenario, and the one that I've heard most frequently from different sources, has been that there was a meeting in the middle of March 2003, chaired by either Scooter or the vice president -- but more frequently I've heard chaired by Scooter -- at which a decision was made to get a "work-up" on me. That meant getting as much information about me as they could: about my past, about my life, about my family. This, in and of itself, is abominable. Then that information was passed at the appropriate time to the White House Communications Office, and at some point a decision was made to go ahead and start to smear me, after my opinion piece appeared in the New York Times.

Conason: If you're right that they started to look at you as early as March 2003, that means either they were anticipating that you were going to tell what you knew about the Niger uranium question or they were upset because you were speaking out against the drive to war anyway.

Wilson: <snip>I had gone on CNN and answered a question about the forged Niger documents and the State Department spokesman's response that "we fell for it." I said I believed that if the U.S. government looked into its files, it would discover that it knew far more about this than the State Department spokesman was letting on. My understanding is it was that statement that led to the so-called work-up meeting and what you called the intelligence operation against me.
<snip>

Conason: You quote a journalist saying they were all afraid they'd be "shipped to Guantánamo" if they displeased the White House over this story.

Wilson: That's right. "Guantánamo" is now a metaphor for being cut off completely from access and sources. I've had any number of reporters who have talked to me about how even the most minor criticism of the administration led to phone calls to their editors from senior officials in the government. I think that's a clear pattern of intimidation.

Conason: Former Assistant Secretary of State Chester Crocker, who was your boss in the Reagan State Department, apparently was kind of shocked that you were suddenly being portrayed as a left-winger.

Wilson: As I recall in the book, I once had a little discussion about this with Tony Blankley [editorial page editor of the Washington Times and former press secretary to Newt Gingrich]. He told me that you become a caricature in these sorts of debates -- and that's clearly what they've tried to do.

I grew up in an old California family where politics, and especially state politics, were the staff of life around our table. We had an uncle who was mayor of San Francisco and later governor of California. We had another uncle who had been a congressman.

Conason: Republicans all.

Wilson: We had an aunt whom we still jokingly refer to as "Mrs. John Birch." It's a staunch Republican family, but this [administration] isn't their Republican Party.

Conason: What's the difference in the GOP from when you were growing up?

Wilson: If you're fiscally responsible, this is not your party. If you believe in a moderate foreign policy characterized by alliances, free trade and the ability to operate in an international environment, this is not your party. If you believe in limited federal government, this is not your party. If you believe that the government should stay out of your bedroom, this is very definitely not your party. In fact, I would argue that unless you believe in the American imperium, imposed on the world by force, or unless you believe in the literal interpretation of the Book of Revelations, this is not your party.

Conason: In 2000, you at first supported George W. Bush.

Wilson: I contributed to his campaign, which is different. In the primary season, I supported him as the candidate who best represented those core Republican values. Now that didn't mean I was going to vote for him. In fact, I declined an opportunity to sign a letter supporting him from former ambassadors for Bush. I always sort of thought I would vote for Al Gore, whom I had known since I was a congressional fellow. But I still believe that the campaign and the platform that was being advanced by Bush were more in our interest than what was being advanced by John McCain.

Conason: But at a certain point, you became disgusted with the Bush campaign.

Wilson: After they lost New Hampshire and decided that their tactic would be to move to the hard right. And then they ran this push-poll campaign denigrating McCain's service to the country, [highlighting] his wife's medical problems and mischaracterizing their adoption of a child -- I believe from South Asia. Pushing that racist button was beyond the pale --

Conason: When you think about who must have been responsible for that episode with McCain.

Wilson: It's clear to me that the guys who did that were the Ralph Reed crowd and the people running Bush's campaign. Let's see, that would be Karl Rove and the "iron triangle," as they called them.

Conason: Was that an early warning of what they would later do to you?

Wilson: I guess it should have been. <snip> There may be dirty pool in a political campaign, but when you're president of the United States and your people do this against an American citizen -- who, by the way, had done nothing more than invite your attention to the truth -- when you do that to him, it's frankly un-American.

Conason: You suggest in the book that the president isn't really concerned about what happened to your wife, which is in real contrast with the way you believe his father would have acted under the same circumstances. How did we reach this level of polarization?

Wilson: It's not what I think his father would have done, but what I know he would have done. I fought a war with him. We were in the foxhole! Look, I bear no personal animus toward the president, other than in his apparent disregard for Valerie's security. The only thing I can suggest is that this is a different crowd that surrounds this president.

As most people know, the president is a captive of his team. People whom his father didn't employ, or kept far away from the center of power, are now right at the center of power -- including, of course, one of his father's great rivals, Don Rumsfeld.

Conason: Some of them were around the first President Bush, such as Colin Powell and Dick Cheney. <snip>

Wilson: Cheney always likes to point out that he never met Joe Wilson. And as I like to point out, I never met Dick Cheney. During the first Gulf War, there is some question as to whether Cheney held what I consider to be the extremist views he holds today.

Conason: Has the White House offered any assistance to you and your wife, any protection?

Wilson: No. None at all. Not even an apology or a by your leave. Not even a "Fuck you, asshole."

Conason: They sent that through other people. They've also tried to portray you, and all the other whistle-blowers who have spoken out against the administration, as partisan Democrats. Do you think that has been an effective technique?

Wilson: It hasn't worked with me. People are touched by this story because it gives a human face to a whole host of lies and deceptions that only now are becoming apparent to the American public. Americans don't like this attitude. Americans don't like to see their women taken out and beaten up.
 
John Dean, who was counsel to Richard Nixon and is credited with largely blowing the whistle on Watergate, has a new book out about the Bush Presidency called "Worse Than Watergate".

Here's an excerpt

"In the three decades since Watergate, this is the first potential scandal I have seen that could make Watergate pale by comparison. [...] To put it bluntly, if Bush has taken Congress and the nation into war based on bogus information, he is cooked. Manipulation or deliberate misuse of national security intelligence data, if proven, could be 'a high crime' under the Constitution's impeachment clause. It would also be a violation of federal criminal law, including the broad federal anti-conspiracy statute, which renders it a felony 'to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose.'"

His main thesis is about how Bush & Cheney have systematically worked to increase the powers of the executive branch while shutting down all access to accountability. He maintains that this is the most closed and secretive administration in the history of the United States.

---dr.M.
 
dr_mabeuse said:
"To put it bluntly, if Bush has taken Congress and the nation into war based on bogus information, he is cooked. Manipulation or deliberate misuse of national security intelligence data, if proven, could be 'a high crime' under the Constitution's impeachment clause."

Dean has more faith in the system than I do, if he thinks a Republican-controlled Senate and House of Representatives will ever allow an impeachment hearing or anything close. Neither will the Justice Department care, any more than they evidently care about what happened to Ambassador Wilson and his wife.

It's good to be the king.
 
The title of this thead made me think that there was a new "Where's Waldo?" coming out.:(
 
Svenskaflicka said:
The title of this thead made me think that there was a new "Where's Waldo?" coming out.:(

That's insulting. Our president enjoys a variety of reading material, including the King James Bible and "If You Give A Mouse A Cookie."
 
I was referring to those books that he reads himself, without the help of his mother.
 
shereads said:
[H]e rose to ambassadorial posts through merit and hard work, not as a political appointee.

There's a good reason for the Shrubbies not liking him right there.

If he had bought his positions, they would like him much more.
 
Re: Re: Another book for the GWB Presidential Library

rgraham666 said:
There's a good reason for the Shrubbies not liking him right there.

If he had bought his positions, they would like him much more.

Wouldn't they have to give him a refund?
 
Hello.

I always vote.

I find myself unhappy with all candidates.

I have just one thing with which to make a decision this year.

I will decide who the biggest enemy of our nation is, in this instance, it is not a Nation, but a point of view.

Who would they choose?

Then I will vote for the other guy, and pray.

Lee
 
Currently, magic, the biggest enemy of our nation is the Attorney General of the United States.

I believe he's a Bush/Cheney voter.

:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top