xssve
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Posts
- 5,854
All lit readers want good stories - who is it exactly who is insisting on avoiding the first person? This seems like a generalization about a generalization.I wasn't posting to you, Verdad. I was posting primarily to xssve and Elfin here (and to a few more who will, no doubt, be along shortly to tell us what "all" Lit. readers want).
I believe you should explore all narrative voices, as you say , each has it's particular set of complexities.
Anecdotally, I've read more bad stories in First person than any other mode however, and I'm arguing that it's the result of a particular psychology, i.e., it makes it easier to avoid stepping back and looking at the piece objectively and critically. In a sense, it becomes too personal, the writer tends starts interjecting their own personality projections and personal philosophy into the piece, which may or may not be relevant to the story - not necessarily a problem with the mode itself.
I really don't give a shit what the author thinks, I'm interested in the characters, I want to be entertained, not lectured.
That's more of an esoteric critique however, having to do with certain popular novelists, the problem I see more often in lit is simply a tendency to fall into routine description of mechanical action, "he did this, I did that, it felt good", which sort of defeats the whole purpose of the First person mode, which as you mention, has the advantage of generating an illusion of intimacy and immediacy, i.e, a direct line into the characters emotional state.
In a way, I think it has to do with mixing modes again, writing in First person but falling into a more detached, third person voice. If you work at maintaining consistency in different narrative modes, I think it makes it easier to spot when you're going off course, and/or make smoother segues between modes to achieve desired effect.
Last edited: