America white supremist nation

Hard_Rom

Northumbrian Skald
Joined
Apr 24, 2014
Posts
13,623
America's black president and its white supremacy

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/racism-america-election-obama-clinton-1.3791033

Mention white supremacy in America the next time the conversation turns to the U.S. presidential election, and watch what happens. Heads avert, a few eyes roll, and the conversation resumes, unruffled, after a few polite smiles.

The phrase is regarded as extreme — a gross exaggeration of problems America has, after all, tried to solve. Why, the president of the United States himself is black, and he never uses terms like white supremacy. Which is interesting in itself, because it goes to show the extent to which the American polity is gamed for white ascendancy.

Even a black leader cannot mention systemic discrimination against black Americans without nodding sympathetically to the grievances of white Americans, many of whom believe they are the victims in a politically correct world that values "diversity" over (their) merit.

The very word diversity is seen by millions of Americans as code for quotas and reverse discrimination. White conservatives talk wistfully about "colourblindness," something they seem persuaded actually exists.

Prof. Eddie Glaude, dean of the department of African American and religious studies at no less an institution than Princeton University, politely offers the following definition of white supremacy in America: "The belief that white people matter more than others."

In his rather ironically titled book, Democracy in Black, Glaude puts forth a powerful argument that white supremacy — racism — is not an aberration, the thoughts and actions of a hateful few, but rather a value baked into American democracy from its inception.

The founders, Glaude points out, were capable of jarring cognitive dissonance; even as they created a shining city on the hill with freedom and justice for all, they owned slaves. They saw no contradiction in that. And, writes Glaude, that disjoint continues to this day.

"Think about it this way," he writes. "When communists declare that Stalinism wasn't really communism, or when Christians and Muslims say that the horrific things some Christians and Muslims have done in the name of their religion isn't really Christianity or Islam, what are they doing? They are protecting their ideology…"

Likewise, he says, Americans separate the pristine ideal of America from its ugly realities: "We keep treating America like we have a great blueprint and we've just strayed from it. But the fact is we've built this country true. Black folks were never meant to be full-fledged participants."
Black Americans are harassed and killed by police and imprisoned in grossly disproportionate numbers. They are much poorer, twice as unemployed, more uneducated, and lead the nation in deadly diseases.

There is really only one explanation for that, unless you actually believe blacks are more intrinsically criminal, sick and stupid.

Blacks are constantly blamed for their own suffering, and Donald Trump is trying to ride that shibboleth right to the White House.

One of his campaign architects is Steve Bannon, the former head of the Breitbart website — which seems to relish singling out blacks for all sorts of sins, accuses Black Lives Matter activists of encouraging cop-killers and obsesses about "black crime" and "black-on-black crime."

(Yes, it is true most crime against blacks is perpetrated by blacks. And most crime against whites is perpetrated by whites. But there are no accounts of "white-on-white" crime.)

What's remarkable, though, is the crashing silence from Democrats about the life of black people in America. Hillary Clinton largely ignores them, concentrating instead on appealing to Republicans disaffected by Trump's loopiness. It's politically shrewd, perhaps; a politician has to prioritize for maximum effect, and blacks have been a reliable Democratic constituency for decades.

"All lives matter," Clinton admonished a black congregation several months ago, using what has since become a white-resentment code phrase.
 
:rolleyes:

Everyone is such a victim in the USA....everyone but the white male is oppressed!!

LOL what a load of SJW loser bullshit.
 
:rolleyes:

Everyone is such a victim in the USA....everyone but the white male is oppressed!!

LOL what a load of SJW loser bullshit.

White privilege in America is as real as the nose on your face, and you know it.
 
White privilege in America is as real as the nose on your face, and you know it.

Then you should have NO PROBLEM pointing out that white privilege as well as explaining why Asians, Jews and a large portion of the Latino community have more of it than white people.

White privilege is a SJW lie.
 
Hard_Rom

LOL....thanks for the racist propaganda. Sorry we all can't be perfect like Canada...Don't worry I don't expect a response loser.
 
Niggers are America's dose of gonorrhea.

Mexicans are Montezuma's Revenge (diarrhea)
 
You don't have to worry about what is white privilege or not. You can live, work, attend school and church, shop, be entertained, and all while only seeing a few non-white faces if any, and never concerning yourself with racism your entire life.

That is white privilege.
 
You don't have to worry about what is white privilege or not.

No but it is fascinating watching people try to invent it.

You can live, work, attend school and church, shop, be entertained, and all while only seeing a few non-white faces if any, and never concerning yourself with racism your entire life.

I see a non-white face every day....usually right after I take a piss in the morning I look up and there in the mirror are slanty eyes looking back. I'M SUCH A VICTIM!!! OHHHHHHH MAH GAWD THE WHITE MAN IS HOLDING MEH DOWN CUZ MAH DADDY AND I EAT RICE FOR BREAKFAST!!!

LOL my old man would drive across the country just to kick my ass if I ever tried to pretend my Korean was a disability.

Do you really think a Korean mutt who spent 15 years in the south and spent the better part of a decade in the military never encountered racism? Seriously?

WOW lol.....

That is white privilege.

No, it's not.

That's my choice to live in this particular remote mountain town privilege. Even though it's 97% white here there is nothing stopping other minorities from moving out here.

I could have moved to Ktown L.A. and seen much much fewer white people. Shit I wouldn't even have to speak English.

I could have just moved to rural Korea and not hardly ever seen ANY white people.
 
Last edited:
You don't have to worry about what is white privilege or not. You can live, work, attend school and church, shop, be entertained, and all while only seeing a few non-white faces if any, and never concerning yourself with racism your entire life.

That is white privilege.

That is everybody's privilege. With the exception of those who have physical or mental infirmities, and this includes members of all races. Anybody who wants can lead the life you describe, if they actually choose to do so. However, there are those who choose to have children when they are 15 years old, or to shoot up dope or get drunk or drop out of school or do any other of the self-destructive things some people, of all races, do to themselves.

And I see a non-white face every day when I happily kiss my wife "good-morning."
 
Sure thing: how many white people got deported this year?

https://nastyhobbit.org/data/media/13/you-got-owned.jpg

Here is a whole slew of white people who were deported in the past, and rightly so: http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/deport...till-collecting-u-s-social-security-1.2805388

They had actually entered the country legally, unlike the illegal aliens you are probably thinking about. There have been others, who are naturalized citizens but who get deported for illegal acts.
 
Blacks are constantly blamed for their own suffering,

Don't suppose that the preponderance of female headed households among blacks in the USA could have anything to do with that suffering, do you? Perish the thought- nah- that's just some racist, whitey trash-talkin' theory. Oh, and who is supposed to pick up the tab for black males' unwillingness to raise his own children? Racist whitey, of course. Well President Hillary will fix it all- with more government programs.

By the way, when I came to the USA as a baby, the rate of illegitimacy among blacks, as well as females headed household, in this country was just a little higher than that of whites. Two generations of the welfare state, and it has exploded among American Negroes. And in those same two generations, sociologists have been telling us that fathers don't matter anyway. Well as a mom of four, I can tell you that is twaddle.

Just the thoughts a non-white woman who happens to have been married for over 30 years to one of those horrible white men.
 
Last edited:
Black Americans would not have to worry about racism in America if their own race had not traded or sold them into slavery originally. Here in the US black Americans do their best to be separatists and promote racism. Instead of labeling themselves as Americans, they chose to call themselves Afro Americans which the vast majority of them are not. An Afro or African American is a person born in Africa who has immigrated to the US and has become a naturalized citizen. An Afro or African American does not have to be black. They can be French, English, Dutch or Arab as all of those people's settled and raised families in Africa.
 
Black Americans would not have to worry about racism in America if their own race had not traded or sold them into slavery originally. Here in the US black Americans do their best to be separatists and promote racism. Instead of labeling themselves as Americans, they chose to call themselves Afro Americans which the vast majority of them are not. An Afro or African American is a person born in Africa who has immigrated to the US and has become a naturalized citizen. An Afro or African American does not have to be black. They can be French, English, Dutch or Arab as all of those people's settled and raised families in Africa.

So racism in the US is the fault of blacks? And any drug problems the US has are the fault of Columbians? I suppose any gun issues in the US are the fault of the English too then, eh?

Also there is only one race on this planet, homo sapien sapiens.
 
Last edited:
Canada’s race problem? It’s even worse than America’s.

http://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/out-of-sight-out-of-mind-2/

The racial mess in the United States looks pretty grim and is painful to watch. We can be forgiven for being quietly thankful for Canada’s more inclusive society, which has avoided dramas like that in Ferguson, Mo. Our Fergusons are hidden deep in the bush, accessible only by chartered float plane: 49 per cent of First Nations members live on remote reserves. Those who do live in urban centres are mostly confined to a few cities in the Prairies. Fewer than 40,000 live in Toronto, not even one per cent of the total population of the Greater Toronto Area.

We are distracted by the stories of corrupt band councils, or flooded reserves, or another missing Aboriginal woman. Yes, we admit there is a governance problem on the reserves. We might agree that “something” should be done about the missing and murdered women. But collectively, we don’t say it out loud: “Canada has a race problem.”

If we don’t have a race problem then what do we blame? Our justice system, unable to even convene Aboriginal juries? Band administrators, like those in Attawapiskat, who defraud their own people? Our health care system that fails to provide Aboriginal communities with health outcomes on par with El Salvador? Politicians too craven to admit the reserve system has failed? Elders like Chief Ava Hill, cynically willing to let a child die this week from treatable cancer in order to promote Aboriginal rights? Aboriginal people themselves for not throwing out the leaders who serve them so poorly? Police forces too timid to grasp the nettle and confront unbridled criminality like the organized drug-smuggling gangs in Akwesasne? Federal bureaucrats for constructing a $7-billion welfare system that doesn’t work? The school system for only graduating 42 per cent of reserve students? Aboriginal men, who have pushed their community’s murder rate past Somalia’s? The media for not sufficiently or persistently reporting on these facts?

Or: us? For not paying attention. For believing our own hype about inclusion. For looking down our noses at America and ignorantly thinking, “That would never happen here.” For not acknowledging Canada has a race problem.
 
The reasons for white racism...

Blacks tend to perform poorly on all the mental aptitude tests, however they are designed. They tend to perform poorly in school. They have an illegitimacy rate that is about three tines the white rate, and a crime rate that is about eight times the white rate.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the War on Poverty begun the same year were followed by five years of black ghetto rioting, and more durable increases in black social pathology. Black academic performance improved little if at all.

Predominantly black public schools are usually dangerous places where little learning takes place. They are particularly dangerous for the whites and Asians who attend.

It should come as a surprise to no one that these durable Negro characteristics generate durably negative opinions of blacks, even though it is often dangerous to state these opinions in public.

White racism persists because black behavior and performance reinforce it generation after generation. Those who maintain that the races are innately equal maintain something for which there is no evidence at all.
 
Blacks tend to perform poorly on all the mental aptitude tests, however they are designed. They tend to perform poorly in school. They have an illegitimacy rate that is about three tines the white rate, and a crime rate that is about eight times the white rate.

That "tends" is going to trip you up and reveal your racism every time. Some blacks are brilliant and perform brilliantly given the upbringing, support, education, and opportunities of any other group of folks you can mention. That destroys any argument that the black race (which is getting as mixed in with other races as the Caucasian one is) is inherently deficient in any way--or even inherently tends in that direction.
 
http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/racism/

Racism
Racism argues that humans can be divided into different racial groups, each with characteristics that are inherited and unchanging — and that those differences explain inequality in societies.

While xenophobia — or fear of those unlike ourselves — has long been a part of human cultures, the concept of race first appeared in the English language around the 17th century. North Americans began to use the term in their scientific writings by the late 18th century. Racism began to be studied by scientists in the 19th century. At the time the ideology explained some political and economic conflicts in parts of the world, and legitimized the dominant role of British capitalism in the world economic system.

Racism is universal. It is evident in many different ethno-racial groups and is not limited to Caucasian groups.

Racist thinking presumes that differences among groups are innate and not subject to change. Thus, intelligence, attitudes and beliefs are viewed as not affected by one’s environment or history. The existence of groups at the bottom or top of the social hierarchy is interpreted as the natural outcome of an inferior or superior biological makeup and not the result of social influences. Racists reject social integration because they believe the mixing of groups would result in the degeneration of the superior group.

Racist ideology is based upon three false assumptions: That biological differences are equal to cultural differences; that biological makeup determines the cultural achievements of a group; and that biological makeup limits the type of culture a group can develop. Research shows these assumptions are wrong and largely based on the untenable position that nature (biology) is a single causal agent. Evidence showing that differences within groups are greater than differences between groups, and that social factors have an impact on behaviour, argue strongly against racist beliefs.

Research today tends to focus on the genetic underpinning of human variance, such as in the Human Genome Project. One of the most significant findings of the Project is that humans are far more alike than they are different — 99.9 per cent of genetic material is the same for all humans.

The Chinese head tax is an example of institutional racism. It stemmed from the belief that Chinese immigrants would be a burden on the then-predominantly White Canadian society.

Institutional racism also exists when policies or programs seem racially neutral, but either intentionally or unintentionally put minority group members at a disadvantage. As an example, in certain provinces the process for selecting citizens for jury duty results in Aboriginal people rarely being selected. These dimensions of racism reveal that power, and individuals in positions of power, can create or perpetuate racial policies or practises.

In the latter half of 20th century, some North American scholars continued to argue there were racial differences at the root of social behaviours. Arthur Jensen, a professor of education at University of California Berkeley, claimed there were measurable intelligence differences between Blacks and Whites. R. Herrnstein and C. Murray supported Jensen's work and argued that general intelligence varied according to race. They claimed to have detected a pattern showing differences between Asians, Whites and Blacks. In Canada, Jean Phillipe Rushton claimed to detect a clear social and psychological ranking among Asians, Whites and Blacks, in that order, for some characteristics including sexual behaviour and intelligence. These claims have not been supported by other researchers and the results are not considered scientific.
 
That "tends" is going to trip you up and reveal your racism every time. Some blacks are brilliant and perform brilliantly given the upbringing, support, education, and opportunities of any other group of folks you can mention. That destroys any argument that the black race (which is getting as mixed in with other races as the Caucasian one is) is inherently deficient in any way--or even inherently tends in that direction.

Accusations of racism are the only response to legitimate criticisms of the Negro race. I use the word "tend" to demonstrate my knowledge that the statement "Blacks are dangerous and inferior," is not true, if by "Blacks" one means "All blacks."

Racial differences in behavior and performance overlap. Nevertheless, average differences are obvious. They have a durability that strongly indicates genetic causation.

During the civil rights movement one could plausibly argue that black social pathology was due to racial discrimination, and that poor black academic performance was due to inferior black schools.

This is no longer possible. Black social pathology got worse after the civil rights legislation was signed. This substantiates arguments presented by segregationists before the civil rights legislation was signed into law.

Liberals are nervy calling for "a conversation on race."

I want an honest conversation on race. I want it to be safe for geneticists to explain their findings into the role genes play in determining intelligence and criminal behavior, and how these genes differ in frequency between the races.

I want it to be safe for whites to explain how we really feel about a race that robs us, ruins neighborhoods we grew up in, turns our public schools into dangerous places where little learning takes place, burdens the welfare system with our tax money, and is discriminated in favor of with affirmative action programs.

Whites in the United States would be better off if all the blacks left. If all the whites left blacks would be lost. They could not maintain a modern civilization with a computer dependent economy. Look at the mess they have made of Haiti. Look at the mess they are making of Zimbabwe.

I want a conversation on race in which it is safe to tell the truth.
 
Last edited:
The vindication of Professor Arthur Jensen

In the latter half of 20th century, some North American scholars continued to argue there were racial differences at the root of social behaviours. Arthur Jensen, a professor of education at University of California Berkeley, claimed there were measurable intelligence differences between Blacks and Whites.

Jensen's most controversial work, published in February 1969 in the Harvard Educational Review, was titled "How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?" It concluded, among other things, that Head Start programs designed to boost African-American IQ scores had failed, and that this was likely never to be remedied, largely because, in Jensen's estimation, 80% of the variance in IQ in the population studied was the result of genetic factors and the remainder was due to environmental influences.[10]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Jensen

The gains from Head Start are temporary. No Child Left Behind not only failed to close the race gap in academic performance, it failed to reduce it.

The race gap in SAT averages between blacks and whites increased slightly between the school years of 1986 - 87 and 2013 - 14.

http://nces.ed.gov/FastFacts/display.asp?id=171

After "How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?" was published Professor Jensen had classes interrupted. He received death threats. He sometimes needed police protection. Professor Jensen was a brave man who was persecuted for telling a truth that is obvious even to most people who pretend otherwise.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top