Amazon Writers Caught Using AI

HeyAll

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 25, 2008
Posts
5,304
Yes, another AI thread

This one is worth a read:

https://futurism.com/fantasy-novel-ai-prompt-copy-style

Two authors accidentally left their AI prompts in books they sold. Flaming ensued.

One guy wrote 171 novels in the last 7 years.

Readers Annoyed When Fantasy Novel Accidentally Leaves AI Prompt in Published Version, Showing Request to Copy Another Writer's Style by Victor Tangermann


Readers were annoyed to discover something galling: evidence that an author used AI, right in the middle of a novel.

The novel, titled "Darkhollow Academy : Year 2," penned by author Lena McDonald, falls under a romance subgenre called "reverse harem," which conventionally follows a female protagonist with multiple male partners.

But as eagle-eyed fans of the genre were irritated to discover, the author left glaringly obvious evidence of not only using an AI chatbot to write portions of the book — but also of a naked attempt to copy the style of a real fellow writer.

"I've rewritten the passage to align more with J. Bree's style, which features more tension, gritty undertones, and raw emotional subtext beneath the supernatural elements," a since-deleted passage in chapter three of the novel reads, as seen in screenshots posted to the ReverseHarem subreddit earlier this month.

J. Bree is the human author of an internationally bestselling series of romance and fantasy novels.

The instance is yet another illustration of how Amazon is being flooded with self-published AI slop, a trend that has been going on ever since the tech went mainstream a few years ago. It's a real problem for human authors, too, with AI-generated books drowning out their work in search results pages.

In one particularly egregious example, author Jane Friedman discovered back in 2023 that roughly a dozen books were being sold on Amazon with her name on them.

Understandably, the small ReverseHarem community on Reddit was outraged after McDonald was caught blatantly using AI to rip off the voice of a real author.

"I just about fell out of my chair when I read this!" wrote the user who shared the screenshots.

"I got the book to provide secondary confirmation that this is real," another user chimed in. "Which means everyone has now read part of the book, which qualifies for a Goodreads rating, and possibly even Amazon."

Readers tore into the book in a storm of one-star reviews.

"This was written with generative AI, as is clear by the prompt that was left in the book before uploading to Amazon," one disgruntled reviewer wrote. "I will support authors in many, many ways, but generative AI is theft and it’s not a replacement for actual writing."

"I would assume all of her other writing uses AI as well, as book 1 of this series released 1/24/25, book 2 on 3/13/25, and book 3 on 3/23/25," one GoodReads reviewer wrote. "That's faster than Steven King."

A book reviewer account called Indie Book Spotlight put it a lot more bluntly in a Bluesky post.

"F**k you if you steal and copy authors’ works," the user wrote. "F**k you if you use gen ai and call yourself a writer. You’re an opportunist hack using a theft machine."

McDonald's blunder is just the tip of the iceberg. Two other purported authors identified by Indie Book Spotlight were caught dabbling with generative AI to churn out novels.

Earlier this year, a writer who goes by KC Crowne was also seemingly caught leaving ChatGPT prompts in the text of their work.

"Thought for 13 seconds," one passage of a book titled "Dark Obsession" on Amazon reads, as seen in screenshots posted to the RomanceBooks subreddit in January. "Certainly! Here's an enhanced version of your passage, making Elena more relatable and injecting additional humor while providing a brief, sexy description of Grigori."

Crowne's Amazon page features a whopping 171 titles, each adorned with an AI-generated cover of topless, tattoo-covered men.

"International Bestselling Author and Amazon Top 8 US Bestseller," the author's bio reads.

A third writer, who goes by Rania Faris, was also caught using an AI chatbot.

"This is already quite strong, but it can be tightened for a sharper and more striking delivery while maintaining the intensity and sardonic edge you're aiming for," reads a passage one Threads user discovered in a printed copy of Faris' book.

Oddly enough, Crowne's novels are getting predominantly positive reviews on GoodReads, indicating they have found their niche, and readers may either not care or not be aware of the use of AI.

Users on Bluesky were sharing theories as to why.

"Oh wow, I just caught up on the KC Crowne AI thing," award-winning Canadian author Krista Ball wrote in a post back in January. "So setting aside the AI prompt left in the book, I am amazed that this wasn't mentioned anywhere by the early readers, the street team, etc - which leads into my paranoid theory that a percentage of readers are just skim reading."

"Remember back in the day when writing fast was like a good reputation builder?" she added. "Now it's sus as all hell."

Neither McDonald nor Faris has publicly listed contact information. Crowne, at least, is taking accountability for the situation.

"Earlier this year, I made an honest mistake," Crowne wrote in an email to Futurism. "I accidentally uploaded the wrong draft file, which included an AI prompt. That error was entirely my responsibility, and that's why I made the tough decision to address it publicly."

Crowne claimed that "while I occasionally use AI tools to brainstorm or get past writer’s block, every story I publish is fundamentally my own," saying that "I only use AI-assisted tools in ways that help me improve my craft while fully complying with the terms of service of publishing platforms, to the best of my ability."

AI or not, Crowne has somehow published 171 novels over the last seven years.

Whether the use of generative AI in self-published books on Amazon breaks any rules remains somewhat unclear. An Amazon spokesperson pointed us to the company's content guidelines, which govern "which books can be listed for sale, regardless of how the content was created."

The guidelines have an entire subsection dedicated to the use of AI, which stipulates that "AI-assisted content" is permitted and sellers aren't even "required to disclose" its use. However, any "AI-generated images include cover and interior images and artwork" have to be labeled as such.

The internet at large is also facing an existential threat in the shape of an AI slop tsunami. Do we really need to extend that trend to 300-page fantasy novels to read on the subway to work?

Self-published authors who are trying to stand out in an already busy marketplace aren't hopeful.

"They bring down the reputation of those of us who don't touch AI to write our books," author Catherine Arthur tweeted. "Being tarred with the 'self-published = written by AI' label is not good, and if they don't stop, then that's what may happen."






 
I read one article on this news that quoted Faris (I think it was her) as playing the victim. "People are being mean to me, but just imagine how awful I feel that my beta reader went and changed my text and I didn't even know."
 
Well, 171 novels in 7years breaks down to about 2 novels per month. Now, if you allow that 50,000 words may be considered a novel and not a novella, then I suppose it’s possible to “ to write 171 novels” if you scrap revisions, research, beta readers and more than one spell-check. Perhaps there’s enough smut and predictable plots in such books to entertain bored commuters whose brains remain in autopilot. Good writing, and good reading, requires time, passion, and an inquisitive mind. Makes me wonder how the Amazon junk-juggernaut will play out.
 
Crowne claimed that "while I occasionally use AI tools to brainstorm or get past writer’s block, every story I publish is fundamentally my own," saying that "I only use AI-assisted tools in ways that help me improve my craft while fully complying with the terms of service of publishing platforms, to the best of my ability."

While I sometimes use AI to come up with all my ideas, write them down, edit them, come up with cover art, and upload them for sale online, the important part is all mine.
 
I read one article on this news that quoted Faris (I think it was her) as playing the victim. "People are being mean to me, but just imagine how awful I feel that my beta reader went and changed my text and I didn't even know."
So the author sends their master file to beta readers? Weak excuse.
 
Well, 171 novels in 7years breaks down to about 2 novels per month. Now, if you allow that 50,000 words may be considered a novel and not a novella, then I suppose it’s possible to “ to write 171 novels” if you scrap revisions, research, beta readers and more than one spell-check. Perhaps there’s enough smut and predictable plots in such books to entertain bored commuters whose brains remain in autopilot. Good writing, and good reading, requires time, passion, and an inquisitive mind. Makes me wonder how the Amazon junk-juggernaut will play out.

That is very suspicious. As a fast writer I can pull off 60K in 30 days, and I have my spreadsheet from the latest NaNo to back that up. Even then, after making a NaNo draft, I don't even want to write a story longer than 2.5K for at least another 30 days. I'm not sure how someone would draft 2 full blown novels on a monthly basis either, let alone having them 100% done and published. I don't even think the pulp writers from the 30s did that, and they were fast writers on their own. They didn't even have computers in the first place.
 
So the author sends their master file to beta readers? Weak excuse.
She claims that, because of time pressures, she didn't notice the insertions. Who a) shares the master file (like you mention), but also b) asks for a beta-read but doesn't look at the feedback, and c) asks for a beta-read as the final step before publishing?

I mentioned on Bluesky that if you let AI write your story, you're the beta reader.
 
That is very suspicious. As a fast writer I can pull off 60K in 30 days, and I have my spreadsheet from the latest NaNo to back that up. Even then, after making a NaNo draft, I don't even want to write a story longer than 2.5K for at least another 30 days. I'm not sure how someone would draft 2 full blown novels on a monthly basis either, let alone having them 100% done and published. I don't even think the pulp writers from the 30s did that, and they were fast writers on their own. They didn't even have computers in the first place.
Walter B Gibson, who wrote The Shadow novels under the name Maxwell Grant wrote a complete novel every two weeks and did it for over a decade! He produced almost two hundred Shadow novels alone in addition to all his other writing assignments. Those pulp writers were machines!
 
Walter B Gibson, who wrote The Shadow novels under the name Maxwell Grant wrote a complete novel every two weeks and did it for over a decade! He produced almost two hundred Shadow novels alone in addition to all his other writing assignments. Those pulp writers were machines!

What I'd give to not be a polymath and pull off THAT...
 
Yes, another AI thread

This one is worth a read:

https://futurism.com/fantasy-novel-ai-prompt-copy-style

Two authors accidentally left their AI prompts in books they sold. Flaming ensued.

One guy wrote 171 novels in the last 7 years.

Readers Annoyed When Fantasy Novel Accidentally Leaves AI Prompt in Published Version, Showing Request to Copy Another Writer's Style by Victor Tangermann


Readers were annoyed to discover something galling: evidence that an author used AI, right in the middle of a novel.

The novel, titled "Darkhollow Academy : Year 2," penned by author Lena McDonald, falls under a romance subgenre called "reverse harem," which conventionally follows a female protagonist with multiple male partners.

But as eagle-eyed fans of the genre were irritated to discover, the author left glaringly obvious evidence of not only using an AI chatbot to write portions of the book — but also of a naked attempt to copy the style of a real fellow writer.

"I've rewritten the passage to align more with J. Bree's style, which features more tension, gritty undertones, and raw emotional subtext beneath the supernatural elements," a since-deleted passage in chapter three of the novel reads, as seen in screenshots posted to the ReverseHarem subreddit earlier this month.

J. Bree is the human author of an internationally bestselling series of romance and fantasy novels.

The instance is yet another illustration of how Amazon is being flooded with self-published AI slop, a trend that has been going on ever since the tech went mainstream a few years ago. It's a real problem for human authors, too, with AI-generated books drowning out their work in search results pages.

In one particularly egregious example, author Jane Friedman discovered back in 2023 that roughly a dozen books were being sold on Amazon with her name on them.

Understandably, the small ReverseHarem community on Reddit was outraged after McDonald was caught blatantly using AI to rip off the voice of a real author.

"I just about fell out of my chair when I read this!" wrote the user who shared the screenshots.

"I got the book to provide secondary confirmation that this is real," another user chimed in. "Which means everyone has now read part of the book, which qualifies for a Goodreads rating, and possibly even Amazon."

Readers tore into the book in a storm of one-star reviews.

"This was written with generative AI, as is clear by the prompt that was left in the book before uploading to Amazon," one disgruntled reviewer wrote. "I will support authors in many, many ways, but generative AI is theft and it’s not a replacement for actual writing."

"I would assume all of her other writing uses AI as well, as book 1 of this series released 1/24/25, book 2 on 3/13/25, and book 3 on 3/23/25," one GoodReads reviewer wrote. "That's faster than Steven King."

A book reviewer account called Indie Book Spotlight put it a lot more bluntly in a Bluesky post.

"F**k you if you steal and copy authors’ works," the user wrote. "F**k you if you use gen ai and call yourself a writer. You’re an opportunist hack using a theft machine."

McDonald's blunder is just the tip of the iceberg. Two other purported authors identified by Indie Book Spotlight were caught dabbling with generative AI to churn out novels.

Earlier this year, a writer who goes by KC Crowne was also seemingly caught leaving ChatGPT prompts in the text of their work.

"Thought for 13 seconds," one passage of a book titled "Dark Obsession" on Amazon reads, as seen in screenshots posted to the RomanceBooks subreddit in January. "Certainly! Here's an enhanced version of your passage, making Elena more relatable and injecting additional humor while providing a brief, sexy description of Grigori."

Crowne's Amazon page features a whopping 171 titles, each adorned with an AI-generated cover of topless, tattoo-covered men.

"International Bestselling Author and Amazon Top 8 US Bestseller," the author's bio reads.

A third writer, who goes by Rania Faris, was also caught using an AI chatbot.

"This is already quite strong, but it can be tightened for a sharper and more striking delivery while maintaining the intensity and sardonic edge you're aiming for," reads a passage one Threads user discovered in a printed copy of Faris' book.

Oddly enough, Crowne's novels are getting predominantly positive reviews on GoodReads, indicating they have found their niche, and readers may either not care or not be aware of the use of AI.

Users on Bluesky were sharing theories as to why.

"Oh wow, I just caught up on the KC Crowne AI thing," award-winning Canadian author Krista Ball wrote in a post back in January. "So setting aside the AI prompt left in the book, I am amazed that this wasn't mentioned anywhere by the early readers, the street team, etc - which leads into my paranoid theory that a percentage of readers are just skim reading."

"Remember back in the day when writing fast was like a good reputation builder?" she added. "Now it's sus as all hell."

Neither McDonald nor Faris has publicly listed contact information. Crowne, at least, is taking accountability for the situation.

"Earlier this year, I made an honest mistake," Crowne wrote in an email to Futurism. "I accidentally uploaded the wrong draft file, which included an AI prompt. That error was entirely my responsibility, and that's why I made the tough decision to address it publicly."

Crowne claimed that "while I occasionally use AI tools to brainstorm or get past writer’s block, every story I publish is fundamentally my own," saying that "I only use AI-assisted tools in ways that help me improve my craft while fully complying with the terms of service of publishing platforms, to the best of my ability."

AI or not, Crowne has somehow published 171 novels over the last seven years.

Whether the use of generative AI in self-published books on Amazon breaks any rules remains somewhat unclear. An Amazon spokesperson pointed us to the company's content guidelines, which govern "which books can be listed for sale, regardless of how the content was created."

The guidelines have an entire subsection dedicated to the use of AI, which stipulates that "AI-assisted content" is permitted and sellers aren't even "required to disclose" its use. However, any "AI-generated images include cover and interior images and artwork" have to be labeled as such.

The internet at large is also facing an existential threat in the shape of an AI slop tsunami. Do we really need to extend that trend to 300-page fantasy novels to read on the subway to work?

Self-published authors who are trying to stand out in an already busy marketplace aren't hopeful.

"They bring down the reputation of those of us who don't touch AI to write our books," author Catherine Arthur tweeted. "Being tarred with the 'self-published = written by AI' label is not good, and if they don't stop, then that's what may happen."
Just wow.
 
Walter B Gibson, who wrote The Shadow novels under the name Maxwell Grant wrote a complete novel every two weeks and did it for over a decade! He produced almost two hundred Shadow novels alone in addition to all his other writing assignments. Those pulp writers were machines!

Well, when you were getting paid a penny a word it was write fast or starve
Still, incredibly impressive.
 
That is very suspicious. As a fast writer I can pull off 60K in 30 days, and I have my spreadsheet from the latest NaNo to back that up. Even then, after making a NaNo draft, I don't even want to write a story longer than 2.5K for at least another 30 days. I'm not sure how someone would draft 2 full blown novels on a monthly basis either, let alone having them 100% done and published. I don't even think the pulp writers from the 30s did that, and they were fast writers on their own. They didn't even have computers in the first place.
Back in the 50s or 60s Lionel Fanthorpe knocked out something like 89 short novels in 3 years. It's possible but doesn't leave much time for quality or anything else.

One situation where somebody can legitimately be putting up a bunch of books quickly is when they're uploading stuff they wrote earlier e.g. somebody who's been on Lit for years before they decide to put all those stories on Amazon. Worth checking for that possibility before passing judgement, but it doesn't sound like that's what was going on here.
 
Back in the 50s or 60s Lionel Fanthorpe knocked out something like 89 short novels in 3 years. It's possible but doesn't leave much time for quality or anything else.

One situation where somebody can legitimately be putting up a bunch of books quickly is when they're uploading stuff they wrote earlier e.g. somebody who's been on Lit for years before they decide to put all those stories on Amazon. Worth checking for that possibility before passing judgement, but it doesn't sound like that's what was going on here.

Quality and pulp fiction don't usually go hand in hand together, if you know where I'm going towards to.

The second situation though is something that I agree, and I've done it. The work that I scrapped from the site back in 2020 I actually wrote it until the end, and published every finished episode one by one. I'm not questioning that, but writing 171 novels in 2 years, nowdays, that we are ironically way busier than a hundred years ago, and also way more distracted... it's understandable to be suspicious.

Still, having a queue of work is good practice.
 
Back
Top