Bn2f
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2020
- Posts
- 10,674
Do Black Lives Matter?Democrats/leftists. That's why they keep insisting black people need help rather than treating them as equals.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do Black Lives Matter?Democrats/leftists. That's why they keep insisting black people need help rather than treating them as equals.
Oh, sorry, I didn't see this before asking the question above. Never mind. I know the answer.If you think there is any group of people who are systemically disadvantaged, you help them on the basis of that criteria. Not their skin color, that's a racist perspective.
If someone is disadvantaged on the basis of their skin color, then focusing on people who are disadvantaged will automatically help them, regardless of skin color.Huh? Come on, even you must be aware that the basis of their being disadvantaged is their skin color.
You don't get more racist than that.
Not necessarily. People are disadvantaged for different reasons, and when skin color is one of those reasons but not the only one, ignoring it as a cause will only exacerbate the problem.If someone is disadvantaged on the basis of their skin color, then focusing on people who are disadvantaged will automatically help them, regardless of skin color.
Well, yes, but here's where your reasoning is flawed: most progressives do NOT "hold the racist perspective that everyone of a particular skin color are all the same". Again, you're letting your own bias creep in here. We get it, you don't like progressives. You're entitled to your opinion but not your own facts, alternative or not.Unless you hold the racist perspective that everyone of a particular skin color are all the same, then using a person's skin color as a determination of whether they are disadvantaged or not is completely flawed.
Not the Democrats and leftists I know. And probably not the ones you know either. Yes, there are extremists out there, but tagging us all with their beliefs is like saying all conservatives think like David Duke.That's why democrats/leftists are racist. They don't target people on the basis of whether they're disadvantaged or not, they target them on the basis of attributes like skin color and just assert specific skin colors as 'disadvantaged'.
Oh, but you certainly can. Accusing Haitian immigrants of eating other people's pets is a pretty good start in that direction.You don't get more racist than that.
Many racists say that.Ah yes, Racism. That meaningless word that is now the last refuge of scoundrels.
Unless you hold the racist perspective that everyone of a particular skin color are all the same, then using a person's skin color as a determination of whether they are disadvantaged or not is completely flawed.
If someone is identifiably disadvantaged, their race is irrelevant. If you identify someone as disadvantaged on the basis of their race, that's extreme racism.Not necessarily. People are disadvantaged for different reasons, and when skin color is one of those reasons but not the only one, ignoring it as a cause will only exacerbate the problem.
Sure...that's why (for example) democrats/leftists argue and think things like voter ID is somehow a disadvantage for non white people:Well, yes, but here's where your reasoning is flawed: most progressives do NOT "hold the racist perspective that everyone of a particular skin color are all the same".
If someone is disadvantaged on the basis of their skin color, then focusing on people who are disadvantaged will automatically help them, regardless of skin color.
You tell 'em. And never forget. They're the first to ever tell a baldface lie. And if EVERYBODY would get off their head-running asses and go to work then you would be to tired to even know the word RACISTS. ANYBODY that yard that office is a liar and a thief...............except TrumpThat's pretty much it. This Haitian affair seals it.
The Trump Campaign Wants Everyone Talking About Race
The former president and his advisers’ strategy is to make white voters afraid—and they don’t care if they have to lie to do it
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/09/trump-vance-campaign-tactic-racism/680009/
JD Vance’s Racist Populism
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/08/jd-vance-racist-populism-white-privilege-trump-harris/
Not if their race is the root cause of the disadvantage.If someone is identifiably disadvantaged, their race is irrelevant.
Not as extreme as pretending race-based disadvantage doesn't even exist.If you identify someone as disadvantaged on the basis of their race, that's extreme racism.
It is beyond well-established that the right's whole reason for pushing for voter ID is that it disproportionately affects nonwhites. It's certainly not out of any genuine concern for the security of our elections, given how rare voter fraud is. I fully expect this to go in one ear and out the other, but in case someone else is reading this and in any danger of falling for that one...Sure...that's why (for example) democrats/leftists argue and think things like voter ID is somehow a disadvantage for non white people:
Excellent work, but you forgot the numerous photos out there of Blacks for Trump booths at fairs and such, with only white people in the picture.
100% agree with this assessment that republicans can’t be racist because they don’t focus on seeing skin color or any kind of pigmentation really!
View attachment 2399038View attachment 2399039View attachment 2399040View attachment 2399041View attachment 2399042
Quite probably. (Yes, some leftists think nonwhites can't be racist by definition. I am not one of them.) Even if their reasons for voting for him are not racist, the fact remains that for whatever reason, they are willing to vote for a racist.so let me get this right, if a Black Americans votes for Trump, they are racists too?
A lot more - as in probably 90% - are NOT "gonna".Because a lot are gonna.
If the shoe fits...So are they racists, or do ya'all have some other name for them? Name calling seems to be the lefts thing. Loudly too.
If you think 400 years of systemic abuse did not have an impact on a particular group of people...I'm not sure if I'd say it makes you racist, but it certainly makes you stupid.
Do you support comrade rory's allegation that Trump & Vance supporters are racist?Many racists say that.
Definitions say otherwise
rory's allegation that Trump & Vance supporters are racist?![]()
I will disagree with Rory's allegation that ALL Trump voters are racist.Do you support comrade rory's allegation that Trump & Vance supporters are racist?![]()
I support the notion that some Harass/Waltzer supporters are racist.I will disagree with Rory's allegation that ALL Trump voters are racist.
Having said that...
https://i.imgur.com/vXHMdgd.png
...I'mpercent in agreement with the sentiment expressed in the sign above.
I will disagree with Rory's allegation that ALL Trump voters are racist.
You do realize absolutely no one here believes that, don't you?My first name is Chloe,
The term "chimp out" is in fact racist. You could have simply said you don't like it when people act aggressive or violent in public - most of us don't! - but you had to use a term that is derogatory to Blacks. So yeah, "Chloe", this is racist.For example, I do not like chimp outs. If a chimp out occurs somewhere I go, I will not go there again. If my neighbors have chimpouts, I will move. This is not racist.
That you believe he did that says a lot more about you than you think it does.Nope, we were pretty much past a lot of that shit back when Obama was first elected and turned "race" (aka black culture) into a divisive issue.
I don't.Do you support comrade rory's allegation that Trump & Vance supporters are racist?![]()