Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apparently the prosecution withheld from discovery a box of ammunition.
Dismissed with prejudice, can not be charged again.
According to braking news.
•
can't say i'm surprised after the judge rules on evidence the way they did.
the only consolation might be that baldwin's name is now officially shit amongst reputable actors and film set staff
to be honest, i'd not even heard about the box of ammo and the stuff in Rob's post; i was referring more to the judge's decision not to allow baldwin's role as anything other than 'actor on set' to be taken into consideration, and his liabilities regarding hiring someone not experienced enough and shunning regular safety protocols on his production.•
Whatever one might think about Alec Baldwin or his abrasive behavior, the law must be applied impartially and dispassionately.
It isn’t like the judge in this case made up the circumstances surrounding the box of ammunition or the law. (And the case should never have gone to court in the first place, imho. There was a clear chain / separation of responsibility, and numerous other facts in evidence, that shielded Alec Baldwin from prosecution for the tragic shooting.)
Contrast that with the shit Aileen Cannon and the corrupt right wing members of the Supreme Court have been doing that warrants their removal. A few judges and the AG in Texas also should be removed from the judicial system altogether for their blatant lack of impartiality when deciding the law.
The Supreme Court's fault. "Absolute Immunity" is now the law of the land (by a 6-3 vote) and has been for several weeks now.If your mechanic fails to put a nut on a tie rod and you kill someone with your car because your wheel goes sideways, whose fault is it?
to be honest, i'd not even heard about the box of ammo and the stuff in Rob's post; i was referring more to the judge's decision not to allow baldwin's role as anything other than 'actor on set' to be taken into consideration, and his liabilities regarding hiring someone not experienced enough and shunning regular safety protocols on his production.
if all the other stuff is true, then the prosecutors are culpable, imo, of allowing him to skate when he should at the very least—be held to account over a situation that would not have come to pass if he'd done his own job/s properly.
Did you pass "The Bar" while you've been exiled to the politics dungeon?The Supreme Court's fault. "Absolute Immunity" is now the law of the land (by a 6-3 vote) and has been for several weeks now.
*nods*
Which doesn't change that fact that the 'actor' is guilty of killing a person and belongs in jail.
Does it really matter where the boom-booms came from? What matters is where one of them went.
Yes it changes him from being guilty of killing a person to the fact that accidents happen. Yes it matters where the bullets came from because they should never have been there.
No, the actor doesn't, the producer does. They never should have charged him the way they did. It could have been anyone on that set that pulled the trigger. It just happened to be Baldwin. The prosecution screwed the pooch because they were looking for the conviction of a big name actor to burnish their reputation.Which doesn't change that fact that the 'actor' is guilty of killing a person and belongs in jail.
Does it really matter where the boom-booms came from? What matters is where one of them went.
could it not be that, as co-writer (with Souza) of the movie, and given his ego, baldwin would have it no other way than his name topping the list of producers?The thing is it seems like Baldwin wasn't really the producer. They put his name on it but that's because his name has value not because he's actuallyt he man in charge.
Aw, but he was the man in charge. He was the producer onsite. He also instigated the haranguing of a qualified union armorer until she quit, then insisted on hiring an unqualified non-union replacement (Hannah Gutierrez Reed), who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter for her part in the debacle. Had they hired a qualified armorer I believe there would have been no live rounds allowed on-site and the pistol would have been checked for safety before being handed to Baldwin.The thing is it seems like Baldwin wasn't really the producer. They put his name on it but that's because his name has value not because he's actuallyt he man in charge.
This is a rabbit hole on its own. I was under the impression that a closed union production prohibited the replacement of a union armorer with a non-union replacement was prohibited under union contract.Aw, but he was the man in charge. He was the producer onsite. He also instigated the haranguing of a qualified union armorer until she quit, then insisted on hiring an unqualified non-union replacement (Hannah Gutierrez Reed), who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter for her part in the debacle. Had they hired a qualified armorer I believe there would have been no live rounds allowed on-site and the pistol would have been checked for safety before being handed to Baldwin.
If she can be convicted for not doing her job, he should be convicted for not doing his and protecting the people on the movie site.
Comshaw
The probelm is she didn't do her job. The armorer is supposed to be in charge of all weapons. Before she handed that pistol to Baldwin she should have checked the cylinder and confirmed each round to make sure what it was supposed to be. Anyone worth their salt NEVER takes a loaded weapon for granted, ESPECIALLY if it's going to be pointed at another human. It was her responsibility to do that and she didn't.Honestly she shouldn't be convicted for not doing her joba side from perhaps just to make an example. This wouldn't be the first person killed on set nor will it be the last. Shit happens. Would I have the same attitude if it happened to my loved one? Probably not. But if a plane door flew off a plane and killed my dog my number 1 voting priority for the rest of my life would be that every plane has to be checked by no fewer than 100 men before take off and if any living thing larger than a gerbil is killed all the inspectors are put to death publically.
At the end of the day Alec Baldwin is simply celebrity A to me. Like he's not even someone I would miss if he never made another movie. I admit to having some bias against rich and famous people in general being above the law so put him away.
I still think this is mostly a case of shit happened. Whoever is at fault its not Alec. He wasn't the one checking the wapons or anything like that.
???? Clarification of an indecipherable comment would be appreciated.By worth their salt you mostly mean paranoid.