adrina is a communist

Yes. The examples of me being mean and intolerant to misogynistic conservative men are "legion". I am a woman with zero tolerance toward misogynistic men. Men who have made no effort to be nice or welcoming toward me. Men who have called me stupid, foolish, man hating :rolleyes: and the like. Men who have been condescending fuckwits but somehow still think after all of their abuse and ill manners that I should respect them.

Yes those are all over the place and I see no problem with it. Whatsoever.

That doesn't make me a man hater. It makes me a woman who is smart enough to recognize someone, in this case some GB men, who doesn't like, doesn't respect and doesn't tolerate an outspoken woman. And further to not be friendly or associate with men who would take advantage of any vulnerability I would choose to display.

That you conflate that with man hating demonstrates to me just how much your mindset is coloring your perception of me. Your perception is not my reality.

You, nor anyone else, will find a single example of me abusing men that have been sincerely nice to me. Well there is one exception and I have admitted my error and apologized. Publicly. I have never been disrespectful, mean, abusive or hateful towards men like St Peter, Emerson, Adre, Disgustipated, Sean, Richard Daily, Rob, Kowboy, Pointless, thor, Queersetti, Perg and countless others I have interacted with. But that goes counter to your narrative so all you see is my lack of tolerance toward those that have been hostile, aggressive and mean to me. Ironically instead of recognizing the pattern of behavior they have demonstrated toward me that has earned them my derision, it is easier for you to pin the man hating label on me.

One could ask why. But I think I already know.
 
Uh huh.

But then, if you weren't so jaundiced on the subject, you wouldn't need anyone to go dig up what you could just go look for yourself.

I didn't fabricate her reputation. She did. I just posted my wish that she'd stop building it up worse. Apparently you missed that part in your zeal to defend her from herself.

The haters here all seem to want to contest the fact that Adrina is a man-hater, and say that there are no facts to support it. But it's a fact, much like a girl having a reputation for being 'easy', so she gets all excited that the guys can't prove it, but they all know where to get laid. Word on the street often has more truth than fiction.
 
Last edited:
The haters here all seem to want to contest the fact that Adrina is a man-hater, and say that there are no facts to support it. But it's a fact, much like a girl having a reputation for being 'easy', so she gets all excited that the guys can't prove it, but they all know where to get laid. Word on the street often has more truth than fiction.

Holy Christ...do you not ever give up? WTF drives you, dude?

Take up knitting...or something.
 
The haters here all seem to want to contest the fact that Adrina is a man-hater, and say that there are no facts to support it. But it's a fact, much like a girl having a reputation for being 'easy', so she gets all excited that the guys can't prove it, but they all know where to get laid. Word on the street often has more truth than fiction.

And she's a god castrated communist, don't forget that!
 
The haters here all seem to want to contest the fact that Adrina is a man-hater, and say that there are no facts to support it. But it's a fact, much like a girl having a reputation for being 'easy', so she gets all excited that the guys can't prove it, but they all know where to get laid. Word on the street often has more truth than fiction.

I don't even really understand what he means with the last couple of sentences.
 
Holy Christ...do you not ever give up? WTF drives you, dude?

Take up knitting...or something.

You'd think he'd have his hands full helping his neighbor. But apparently it's more Manly to continue whining here.
 
You'd think he'd have his hands full helping his neighbor. But apparently it's more Manly to continue whining here.

If he actually went to help them, then he would no longer be able to use them to bash Adrina. That's like misogyny 101 stuff he would have learned while earning one of his many degrees in misogyny.
 
If he actually went to help them, then he would no longer be able to use them to bash Adrina. That's like misogyny 101 stuff he would have learned while earning one of his many degrees in misogyny.

All this reminds me of the woman who sat on Facebook, posting about her injured and dying child? husband? don't really remember...

BUT, how horrible that was. Made big news several years ago.
 
All this reminds me of the woman who sat on Facebook, posting about her injured and dying child? husband? don't really remember...

BUT, how horrible that was. Made big news several years ago.

The part of me that wants to see the good in everyone kept expecting him to make a comment about how very little of what he was arguing about here mattered in the face of such loss that hit people close to him. :eek:
 
I didn't fabricate her reputation. She did. I just posted my wish that she'd stop building it up worse. Apparently you missed that part in your zeal to defend her from herself.

I heard a theory once that what one poster says to another in the threads is like a private phone call in a grocery, and anyone overhearing that private conversation is obligated to treat it as a private conversation they shouldn't have heard, even when their exchange is publicly posted... or some such shit as that... I don't think I ever really understood what I deemed at the time to be a batshit theory anyway...
 
I heard a theory once that what one poster says to another in the threads is like a private phone call in a grocery, and anyone overhearing that private conversation is obligated to treat it as a private conversation they shouldn't have heard, even when their exchange is publicly posted... or some such shit as that... I don't think I ever really understood what I deemed at the time to be a batshit theory anyway...

Like Ty Cobb. :D
 
I heard a theory once that what one poster says to another in the threads is like a private phone call in a grocery, and anyone overhearing that private conversation is obligated to treat it as a private conversation they shouldn't have heard, even when their exchange is publicly posted... or some such shit as that... I don't think I ever really understood what I deemed at the time to be a batshit theory anyway...

???
Also I never said 'treat it as a conversation you shouldn't have heard'. Who the fuck has conversations in the supermarket if the care about others hearing them? I just meant those conversations aren't necessarily FOR you.
Difficult concept when the universe revolves around you and your massive brain I suppose.
 
I heard a theory once that what one poster says to another in the threads is like a private phone call in a grocery, and anyone overhearing that private conversation is obligated to treat it as a private conversation they shouldn't have heard, even when their exchange is publicly posted... or some such shit as that... I don't think I ever really understood what I deemed at the time to be a batshit theory anyway...

Dude...if you overhear a voice on someone's phone in the the produce section...

..."three tomatoes"

DUCK...IT"S A BOMB!
 
In other words:

Guys. Never stick your penises in the hornet's nest.
They might lure you Syren's songs or honey, but the end result is the same.
 
Hash. The person that can't figure out what permanently banned means.

Don't you have someone to go threaten with exposure of personal information? :rolleyes:
 
It's not my argument. Therefore I'm not obligated to provide evidence to support it. Until you do, it's just unsubstantiated opinion. And Busybody level 'debate'.

When one is willfully blind to the substance of the debate, there is no debate.

I can call the sky blue. But if you insist that it isn't because I offer no proof, then the fault in civilized debate doesn't lie in my words. The fault lies in the one who will not see with their own eyes that which is right before them.

You can disagree with the premise that it is blue and offer alternative choices such as azure or aqua but the underlying premise is still sound - it is blue however you choose to redefine it and you can see that for yourself.

Thus, there lies only one final dispute resolution over the color. And that is to attack and degrade and vilify the one who so hatefully and spitefully decried the color out of ignorance and intolerance for those who enjoy the sky.


BTW, it took less than 10 seconds to search and find 200 separate uses by Adrina of the word Misogynist. I have no idea how she could call the many someones she doesn't know misogynists yet at that same time claim she's not intolerant of "conservative men" and doesn't have a reputation for being a "man hater".

The sky is blue.
 
Back
Top