A'CZAR-ING We Will Go

Rumple Foreskin

The AH Patriarch
Joined
Jan 18, 2002
Posts
11,109
Me, I don't mind Shrub appointing Gen Lute's to be the Iraq "War Czar" aka "full-time manager," -- a White House term that would seem to imply no one was doing that job previously. After all, there's virtually no way anyone can do anything to make things any worse

But, the move raises an obvious question: After six years of demonstrable administrative incompetence, why not appoint someone who, in the words of Shrub, "...understands war and government and knows how to get things done," to serve as "full-time manager" of White House activities?

Just a thought.

Rumple Foreskin :cool:

==

Pentagon general to be 'war czar'

By BEN FELLER, Associated Press Writer
Wed May 16, 3:37 AM ET

Anxious to show progress to a nation weary of war, President Bush is hoping a military leader with proven organizational skills can make the government's vast bureaucracy march in step in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Bush's selection of Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute as war czar does not bring the promise of a change in policy, speedier progress or an end to the fighting for U.S. troops. Instead, he is billed as a bureaucracy buster.

Nothing is more important, Bush said Tuesday in announcing Lute's nomination, than getting the commanders and ambassadors in the war zones what they need.

"Douglas Lute can make sure that happens quickly and reliably," Bush said.

Lute's appointment is subject to Senate confirmation.

Lute, 54, is the latest new face on the Iraq front. He is the Pentagon's director of operations and a former leader of U.S. military forces in the Middle East.

Lute's job at the White House will be to work through conflicts among the Pentagon, the State Department and other agencies. He will seek to cut through bureaucracy and deliver fast responses when requests come in from U.S. military commanders and ambassadors.

"General Lute is a tremendously accomplished military leader who understands war and government and knows how to get things done," Bush said, capping a difficult search for new leadership in the wars that have defined his presidency.

In the newly created job, Lute would serve as an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser, maintaining his military status and rank as a three-star general. That, by design, gives the White House a high-level point person on the wars.

Meghan O'Sullivan, who handled day-to-day coordination of Iraq as an assistant to national security adviser Stephen Hadley, recently announced she is leaving. So is Hadley's chief deputy, J.D. Crouch, who coordinated the White House review of its options in Iraq.

It was a difficult job to fill, given the unpopularity of the war, now in its fifth year, and uncertainty about the clout the war coordinator would have. The search was complicated by demands from Congress to bring U.S. troops home from Iraq and scant public support for the war. The White House tried for weeks to fill the position and approached numerous candidates before settling on Lute.

The creation of the new job has also raised questions about whether it will help — or just add more confusion.

The White House has avoided the term "war czar." Bush called Lute the "full-time manager" for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Lute has been director of operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff since September. Before that, he served for more than two years as director of operations at U.S. Central Command, during which he oversaw combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

His addition will help Hadley, whose broad portfolio includes such hot spots as Iran and North Korea.

Until now, Hadley and other West Wing officials have tried to keep turf-conscious agencies marching in the same direction on military, political and reconstruction fronts in Iraq.

Meanwhile, the public's patience for the war has long eroded, and lawmakers — including members of Bush's own party — are pushing a harder line in ensuring that the Iraqi government is making progress toward self-governance.

Anthony Cordesman, an Iraq expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said Lute comes into the job with a stellar background in combat operation and agency coordination.

Yet the nature of the job poses an enormous challenge. Lute won't be able to deal with civilian agencies the way he did with military officers, and his lack of budget authority or ability to reshape regulations could limit his clout, Cordesman said.

"You really need strong leadership and planning from the ambassador and from the commander in Iraq. They're the ones who have to interact with the Iraqis," he said. "In effect, you're a czar in a support role to field commanders and an ambassador 7,000 miles away."

A West Point graduate, Lute, 54, fought in the 1991 Gulf War.

From 1998 to 2000 he commanded the 2nd Cavalry Regiment at Fort Polk, La. He served next as the executive assistant to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs for 14 months before joining the 1st Infantry Division in Schweinfurt, Germany, as the assistant division commander. He also served in Kosovo for six months in 2002 before being assigned to U.S. European Command in January 2003.

He is married to Jane Holl Lute, a former U.S. Army officer, who is now the assistant secretary-general for peacekeeping operations at the United Nations.
 
Last edited:
Rumple Foreskin said:
Me, I don't mind Shrub appointing Gen Lute's to be the Iraq "War Czar" aka "full-time manager," -- a White House term that would seem to imply no one was doing that job previously. After all, there's virtually no way anyone can do anything to make things any worse...



He is married to Jane Holl Lute, a former U.S. Army officer, who is now the assistant secretary-general for peacekeeping operations at the United Nations.
Cor... I bet that's an interesting 'breakfast time'.

"What ya doing today honey?"

"Trying to bring peace to Afganistan this mornng, this afternoon I'll try Iraq. You?"
 
Dept. Of Evil: 'All Of You Must Die'

WASHINGTON, DC—In the latest in a long series of ominous public pronouncements, the Department of Evil released a statement Monday demanding that all residents of the United States must die.

"Yes, all must die," Dread Secretary of Evil Hammond S. Reynolds said during a press conference in Room 1228 of Washington's Robert C. Weaver Federal Building. "There shall soon come an accounting in which all will fall before the Grim Reaper as wheat in winter, as lambs under the knife. Soon all necks will feel the steely bite of our soul- thirsting axe, wielded by the unforgiving iron hand of the Department of Evil. Thus spake I, Dread Secretary Reynolds."

The dread secretary then took questions from the assembled reporters.

Although the Department of Evil has not yet announced the exact timetable for the death of all, it recommends citizens make their peace with doomed relatives and spouses immediately, as the hour of their ending draws ever nigh and will be upon them as soon as the necessary funding has been authorized by the House Appropriations Committee.

"This budget approval is merely a pitiful, niggling formality, for soon we'll be free to swarm across the land draining the life-pus out of all you quivering mortal worms," Reynolds said. "Doubt us not: Come the wintertide, you all shall die, and die you will. Sorry, I meant 'must.' Die you must!"

Originally established by an act of Congress in 1953 and granted broader powers and funding in 1986 under the second Reagan administration, the Department of Evil has been an occasional source of controversy. Its 1993 And The Streets Shall Run Red With The Blood Of The Innocent initiative was highly criticized at the time by moderates, who thought the department's agenda overly harsh.

In 2004, an ambitious plan to seed the clouds with blood and then rain excruciation down upon the thrice-damned didn't even make it past a Senate budget committee, which criticized the plan as poorly conceived.

And last year, the department received a stinging blow after Congress voted to allocate only one-third of the money requested to swell the ranks of its deranged, barbarous demon cavalry.

Despite those recent setbacks, a DOE spokesbeast said that the dread secretary remains confident that his department will prevail in the end.

To publicize their current mission, the Department of Evil distributed to media outlets a ring-bound portfolio titled "You Shall All Perish Screaming 2007," which provides estimates and logistics detailing how everyone will die, a line-by-line budget breakdown, and an addendum apologizing that the document was not printed in human blood. The full text is available at evil.gov.

The "All Must Die" initiative, the highest-profile program proposed by the DOE in recent memory, came under almost immediate scrutiny from politicians on both sides of the aisle.

"I don't understand why we still even have a Department of Evil," Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) said. "It's a Cold War holdover, an artifact of the '50s that has outlived its usefulness. Mr. Reynolds has done as good a job as any recent dread secretary, but as afraid as I am of him, I believe his talents would be better served at Education or Agriculture."

"Once again, Mr. Reynolds wants to throw money at the everyone-dies issue—in this case, $11.43 billion," Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) said. "This is a waste of taxpayer dollars to do work best left to the private sector. It's high time for the DOE to be absorbed into Homeland Security, where it belongs."

At the press conference, Reynolds refused to disclose his reasons for proposing that all must die.

"Question not the dread secretary, insects!" said Reynolds, rearing back his mighty head and bellowing as a powerful crescendo emanated from the department's enormous Gothic pipe organ. "First, the bandwagoners in Congress seek to derail our plans or committee them to death. Now, the mindless blood-bags who populate this teeming nation wish to know why they must perish. I will respond with the same answer we have always given: Despair, groveling vermin, and may your deaf, blind God forsake the United States of America! We're done here."
 
Roxanne:
I seem to remember the problem with the 1993 'The Streets Shall Run Red With The Blood Of The Innocent' innitative was it was launched at the height of the AIDS controversy. There was a lack of screened blood to get the initiative off the ground (well... onto the ground, really).
 
neonlyte said:
Roxanne:
I seem to remember the problem with the 1993 'The Streets Shall Run Red With The Blood Of The Innocent' innitative was it was launched at the height of the AIDS controversy. There was a lack of screened blood to get the initiative off the ground (well... onto the ground, really).
Naturally, as a libertarian I expect such incompetence from unaccountable government bureaucracies. I don't see any real alternatives, though. Ordinarilly I'd say, "privatize it," but when it comes to evil, the private sector just doesn't have nearly the capabilities that governments do.
 
Roxanne Appleby said:
Naturally, as a libertarian I expect such incompetence from unaccountable government bureaucracies. I don't see any real alternatives, though. Ordinarilly I'd say, "privatize it," but when it comes to evil, the private sector just doesn't have nearly the capabilities that governments do.
Agreed. Though charging for parking still wrangles, that really makes my blood run. For God's sake! It's not as if I haven't already paid for the bloody road.
 
And when General Lute fails to win the War in Iraq because of government bureaucratic incompetence, he'll resign and go into the private sphere where none, absolutely none of the bureaucrats are incompetent. ;)
 
Oh, there's incompetent bureaucrats in the private sector, alright. The difference is, they get fired, or if the problem is endemic within an organization, eventually their employer goes broke. Only in government, which gets its money the old fashioned way, through coercion, is incompetence eternal. Private entities that exist in a competitive environment either get competent or die - ask GM, Ford and Chrysler.

Notwithstanding the above, when it comes to evil, governments can actually be amazingly competent, however. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot - the list goes on and on, and the record is unparalleled. If it's evil you seek, government is the vehicle you want.
 
Last edited:
None of the "War Czar" thing makes any sense. First of all, the Secretary of Defense is the guy in charge of the wars in Iraq and Afganistan. General Patraius is the commanding general in charge of the forces in both theaters. The "War Czar" reports to the President and the Deputy Head of the NSA.

Ummm. Who's running the Army, anyway? Does anyone in the White House even know?
 
Back
Top