According To My Calculations... 🤓

Wild_Honey_66

sweet freak
Joined
Mar 7, 2014
Posts
50,279
What have you discovered or concluded today?

Try to say it à la science if you can. I'm not very good at it but it's fun. :)
 
After a period of intense investigation within stringent parameters, the facts show that ending a sleep cycle adjacent to an agreeable human with a moderately dense covering of coiled skin sprouts and a throat motor that vibrates at a low-ish level of RPMs produces 723% more endorphins than ending a sleep cycle unaccompanied.
 
After a period of intense investigation within stringent parameters, the facts show that ending a sleep cycle adjacent to an agreeable human with a moderately dense covering of coiled skin sprouts and a throat motor that vibrates at a low-ish level of RPMs produces 723% more endorphins than ending a sleep cycle unaccompanied.

That sounds accurate to me.
I'll do my own parameter tests in a couple weeks.

For science.
 
I have empirically observed that there are specific voices that can not help but inspire me to smile.

Repetitive observations have returned the same result, with excellent precision and an uncertainty factor of negligible statistical significance.
 
I am currently feeling a passionate but possibly irrational desire to exclude any actual scientists from these proceedings on the basis that they possess an unfair advantage over posers such as yours truly.

I will further contemplate my emotions before declaring a final decision in the matter.
 
I am currently feeling a passionate but possibly irrational desire to exclude any actual scientists from these proceedings on the basis that they possess an unfair advantage over posers such as yours truly.

I will further contemplate my emotions before declaring a final decision in the matter.

Was it the lab coat? Too much?

I can take it off...:rolleyes:
 
Was it the lab coat? Too much?

I can take it off...:rolleyes:

I will have to get back to you after the pleasant spasms of happiness that are taking place in the general region of my throat and nasal passages (as a result of your previous conclusion) cease to occur.
 
Studies have shown naked scientists with accompanied nerd glasses see better and thus are more likely to get laid. :)
 
I have empirically observed that there are specific voices that can not help but inspire me to smile.

Repetitive observations have returned the same result, with excellent precision and an uncertainty factor of negligible statistical significance.

You nerd! :rose:
 
Studies have shown that the addition of sugar laden fruits, such as a fairly large quantity of pineapple, can alter the chemical components that affect the taste of certain substances to be swallowed ...and sporadic testing of such experimentations has thusfar produced satisfactory, tasty, results

As a scientist, this hypothesis is incomplete, and requires a large increase in sample size to confirm to ensure said observation is provable and satisfying.

As such, more pineapple has been procured from the stockroom for consumption. :D
 
As a scientist, this hypothesis is incomplete, and requires a large increase in sample size to confirm to ensure said observation is provable and satisfying.

As such, more pineapple has been procured from the stockroom for consumption. :D

So, in your esteemed estimation, size DOES matter?




😜
 
So, in your esteemed estimation, size DOES matter?




😜

Only with regard to number of samples in order to determine an accurate mean response. 🙂

Larger or smaller...it's still n=1 in the sample table 😆

Repetition and the ability for to repeat testing...as many times as desired...yields better accuracy than one LARGE response, quantitatively.
 
Only with regard to number of samples in order to determine an accurate mean response. 🙂

Larger or smaller...it's still n=1 in the sample table 😆

Repetition and the ability for to repeat testing...as many times as desired...yields better accuracy than one LARGE response, quantitatively.
I concur with the above statement. Sample size, not specimen size. Or in laymen's terms, it's all in how you use it :p
 
Please Note:

All lab coats and spectacles will continue to be worn for the entire duration of this thread.

Thank You
 
***The refractory interval has concluded***

All test subjects are ordered to report for additional sample extraction. Please have all harnesses, clamps, rigging, restraints, and specialty tools ready for use as needed.

Commence
 
Please Note:

All lab coats and spectacles will continue to be worn for the entire duration of this thread.

Thank You

But, uh, pants?

BTW: According to a fictional Nobel Lariat (not Laureate) I'm not actually a Scientist:

Sheldon Cooper; Are you a physicist too General?

General: Even better. I'm an Engineer.

Sheldon Copper: Sighs
 
Back
Top