Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, in gay vanilla situation you want "vers" I think xIs it only used for dom/sub situations? Or can it also be used when a top takes the bottom role?
I am a switch, and not into the BDSM scene. To me, it is meaningless unless you are in a loving trusting relationship with another switch, who understands the dynamics of each role. I was in an almost two year relationship with one, and probably once a month or so, one of us would give up control for a weekend. It is a different headspace to be in. We had safewords, but neither of us ever used them. It never was about BDSM or anything close. It was all about sexual power and who was doing what to whom.Is it only used for dom/sub situations? Or can it also be used when a top takes the bottom role?
Would birch rods be best for that? It has yet another meaning.The switch is all about what I whip your ass with. Remember, words can have more than one meaning.
The correct answer is 'yes it can', but the other answers are more entertaining.Is it only used for dom/sub situations? Or can it also be used when a top takes the bottom role?
Oh, dear.The correct answer is 'yes it can', but the other answers are more entertaining.
It looked like the responses were going in a clear direction, but then @Altissimus pops up with a different take.No, in gay vanilla situation you want "vers" I think x
EDIT: abbreviation of versatile
It looked like the responses were going in a clear direction, but then @Altissimus pops up with a different take.If you mean top/bottom as in S/M, yes. If you mean penetrator and penetratee, no - you want vers, versatile, flexible, etc.
It looked like the responses were going in a clear direction, but then @Altissimus pops up with a different take.No, in gay vanilla situation you want "vers" I think x
EDIT: abbreviation of versatile
I missed the part where you said it was gay. I have no experience in that domain and bow to the wisdom of my learned colleagues. I was responding purely from a D/s T/b perspective in traditional BDSM parlance.
I'm not into labels myself but my 100% gay nephew assures me that switch is distinct from verse, and they aren't interchangeable.As I said to Altissimus, I much prefer Switch over Versatility as a story title, but not if it makes me look stupid
I'm not into labels myself but my 100% gay nephew assures me that switch is distinct from verse, and they aren't interchangeable.
How about naming it "Top and Bottom"?How many people would agree with the earlier respondees if I name my gay story Switch?? I like it a lot better than Versatility.
It's not that you can't refer to changing top/bottom sexual positions as switching or being a switch, but it can be confusing (to anyone at all into BDSM, at least).It looked like the responses were going in a clear direction, but then @Altissimus pops up with a different take.
So I'm asking each of you to give me a picture of your background. Are you a gay male? A member of a bdsm community? Etc., etc.
As I said to Altissimus, I much prefer Switch over Versatility as a story title, but not if it makes me look stupid.
Thanks much!