A

[kinked_a_bit]

good luck

 

[ll74]

Not being anti-Semitic is not the same as being pro-Semitic.

 

[RobDownSouth]

1) Do Jews in Israel have goals, purposes, or agendas?

• To lead a G-dly life in accordance with the Torah
• Ethnic cleansing of all non-Jewish races within the borders of Israel.
• Eradication of both Gaza and the West Bank via "any means necessary"
• Creation of a "Jewish Caste System", with European Jews at the apex, Russian Jews in the middle, African Jews at the lower depths, slightly above goys.

2) Do Jews outside Israel have goals, purposes, or agendas?

• Domination of the world's banking system
• Domination of the Hollywood film industry
• Drinking the blood of Christian babbies
• Adherence to the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion"

3) Why is every non-Jew expected to be pro-Semitic?

• White Christian guilt over the Holocaust

4) White non-Jews, do you defend your own race as vigorously as you defend Jews?

• Never gave it much thought but I suppose so, equal rights and all that

 

[HisArpy]

Jews?

Oh, I see, you mean PEOPLE. Right?

At least I suppose that's what you're trying to say only someone's antisemitism got in the way.

 

[HisArpy]

So now we are supposed to pretend Jews don't exist?

Have you cleared this with them?

JewISH people exist.

Basically my position is that you use words as slurs to no true purpose except to denigrate a class of people.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

• To lead a G-dly life in accordance with the Torah
• Ethnic cleansing of all non-Jewish races within the borders of Israel.
• Eradication of both Gaza and the West Bank via "any means necessary"
• Creation of a "Jewish Caste System", with European Jews at the apex, Russian Jews in the middle, African Jews at the lower depths, slightly above goys.

• Domination of the world's banking system
• Domination of the Hollywood film industry
• Drinking the blood of Christian babbies
• Adherence to the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion"

• White Christian guilt over the Holocaust

• Never gave it much thought but I suppose so, equal rights and all that

Sarcasm isn’t funny when it comes to antisemitism.

 

[HisArpy]

So... using the word Jew... as a designator for a person who is a Jew... slurs and denigrates that person?

That's one of the most anti-Semitic things I've ever heard!

Yup, you nailed it.

Now ask yourself why you did it that way in your OP.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

JewISH people exist.

Basically my position is that you use words as slurs to no true purpose except to denigrate a class of people.

Jews call themselves Jews. It’s only a slur if you use it as and adjective or a verb.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

I'm just asking some questions. I'm curious to hear what y'all have to say.


1) Do Jews in Israel have goals, purposes, or agendas?

2) Do Jews outside Israel have goals, purposes, or agendas?

3) Why is every non-Jew expected to be pro-Semitic?

4) White non-Jews, do you defend your own race as vigorously as you defend Jews?

Jews in Israel don’t have any collective goals, purposes or agendas. The same is true of Jews outside of Israel.

Not being antisemitic is not “pro-Semitic”.

I’m treated as white and enjoy white privilege, but I don’t defend “whiteness”.

 

[HisArpy]

Jews call themselves Jews. It’s only a slur if you use it as and adjective or a verb.

Blacks call themselves niggers too. But it's only a slur when white people say it.

Critically examined, it's the context that matters. It's the context which establishes the intent. The intent of the OP was to separate "Jews" from "people" and then ask stupid questions as if "Jews" don't have hopes/dreams/goals just like the rest of us.

 

[HisArpy]

Good grief.

Do you require Jews to use "JewISH Person" when they describe themselves?
If a Jew said, "I am a Jew" would he be guilty of slurring and denigrating himself?

Of all the possible things you could have chosen to object to... this is the silliest.

Like your mom, I require good manners. If you can't do that, then I require silence on your part.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

Blacks call themselves niggers too. But it's only a slur when white people say it.

Critically examined, it's the context that matters. It's the context which establishes the intent. The intent of the OP was to separate "Jews" from "people" and then ask stupid questions as if "Jews" don't have hopes/dreams/goals just like the rest of us.

If you’re more comfortable referring to Jews as “Jewish people”, that’s fine. I do agree that the OP was being insulting.

 

[schism666]

dumbfuck on dumbfuck crime.

lolol

 

[RobDownSouth]

Blacks call themselves niggers too. But it's only a slur when white people say it.

Critically examined, it's the context that matters. It's the context which establishes the intent. The intent of the OP was to separate "Jews" from "people" and then ask stupid questions as if "Jews" don't have hopes/dreams/goals just like the rest of us.

Oooooooh HisArpy wants to play Vettebingo
I-5 is the number!

 

[R34D]

Not being anti-Semitic is not the same as being pro-Semitic.

“it depends on the context.”

 

[ll74]

“it depends on the context.”

It is not a binary choice.

 

[schism666]

Oooooooh HisArpy wants to play Vettebingo
I-5 is the number!

where's q the negro whisperer for a ruling?

 

[R34D]

It is not a binary choice.

I was mocking the MIT, Harvard, and Penn University Presidents.

 

[ll74]

I was mocking the MIT, Harvard, and Penn University Presidents.

Got it.

All the Presidents did was respond to questions regarding their code of conduct....which does depend on the context of speech.

 

[R34D]

Got it.

All the Presidents did was respond to questions regarding their code of conduct....which does depend on the context of speech.

The statement didn’t need context. It was an absolute. It was a binary choice between, yes and no.

 

[Bn2f]

So now you are saying using the word “Jew” is the same as using the word “nigger.”

You really should have stopped long before this.

This person has made a thread touting trump as the best candidate for the presidency.
He should answer for trumps and his many antisemitic statements.

https://democrats.org/news/donald-trump-continues-his-long-history-of-pushing-antisemitic-tropes/

 

[ll74]

The statement didn’t need context. It was an absolute. It was a binary choice between, yes and no.

The code of conduct for each isn't binary.

 

[R34D]

The code of conduct for each isn't binary.

No, but the answer regarding the statement in question was.

 

[BlueEyesInLevis]

• To lead a G-dly life in accordance with the Torah
• Ethnic cleansing of all non-Jewish races within the borders of Israel.
• Eradication of both Gaza and the West Bank via "any means necessary"
• Creation of a "Jewish Caste System", with European Jews at the apex, Russian Jews in the middle, African Jews at the lower depths, slightly above goys.

• Domination of the world's banking system
• Domination of the Hollywood film industry
• Drinking the blood of Christian babbies
• Adherence to the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion"

• White Christian guilt over the Holocaust

• Never gave it much thought but I suppose so, equal rights and all that

Sarcasm isn’t funny when it comes to antisemitism.

Why do you assume its sarcasm?

 

[HisArpy]

So now you are saying using the word “Jew” is the same as using the word “nigger.”

You really should have stopped long before this.

Depending on the context, even the word ASSHOLE can be a slur.

All you've done is show that you're unwilling to acknowledge that you posted a thread intentionally based on slandering an entire class of people couched as "questions."