A thread for those that screamed "Emoluments!" for years to explain. .

[Conager]

. . .their silence on the Biden and Clinton crime families.

 

[phrodeau]

. . .their silence on the Biden and Clinton crime families.

What do the tax returns show?

 

[LLCox]

Does Biden have a golden toilet ?

 

[Adre]

Surely you have some convictions to show us?

 

[Conager]

What do the tax returns show?

They show that he failed to report the income that hunter is holding for him

 

[Comshaw]

. . .their silence on the Biden and Clinton crime families.

Explanation:

Their comes a time when your voice is horse and throat is sore from trying to yell over the din of those who have had the reins of power for years, yet after dozens of investigations have no proof but still scream "lock her up" in one breath while extolling their leader's reverence for liberty in the next.

There is a lack of ANY verifiable proof; A lack of ANY indictments of either of the named parties especially given the dozens of "investigations" undertaken with rhetoric and fan fair by the Republicans only to be quietly sweep under the carpet when nothing was found.
The real question is where are the verifiable, unvarnished facts to support what you claim?

There's a simple answer: There is none. It's all empty rhetoric.


Comshaw

 

[Comshaw]

They show that he failed to report the income that hunter is holding for him

And this has come to light...now? A few days before the election? The donald has had the presidency for almost 4 years. The Republicans have held the Senate for longer. Why, after talking about this issue for 4 years, only now are they making a concerted effort to dig out the supporting facts? Shouldn't that have happened back then? Or is it because they knew they wouldn't find anything but if they do an "investigation" at the last minute they can cast disprsions without having to produce anything of substance?

"Failed to report the income that Hunter was holding for him"? WTF? How far are you going to stretch to try to make it seem even slighlty plausable?


To put it in my father's vernacular: You ain't got shit!


Comshaw

 

[icanhelp1]

Explanation:

Their comes a time when your voice is horse and throat is sore from trying to yell over the din of those who have had the reins of power for years, yet after dozens of investigations have no proof but still scream "lock her up" in one breath while extolling their leader's reverence for liberty in the next.

There is a lack of ANY verifiable proof; A lack of ANY indictments of either of the named parties especially given the dozens of "investigations" undertaken with rhetoric and fan fair by the Republicans only to be quietly sweep under the carpet when nothing was found.
The real question is where are the verifiable, unvarnished facts to support what you claim?

There's a simple answer: There is none. It's all empty rhetoric.


Comshaw

When thousands of subpoenaed e-mails are swept under the carpet that is a verifiable obstruction of justice and a felony by statute, but when a corrupt FBI director and corrupt DOJ fail to indict and prosecute that should not be misconstrued as innocence, that's deep state corruption and a miscarriage of justice.

 

[zipman]

. . .their silence on the Biden and Clinton crime families.

Lol, there is zero actual evidence that either of them did anything criminal.

ZERO.