A straw visor and muumuu for Hillary and SoulCycle shorts for Bill

Apparently they have, because I haven't seen any evidence to the contrary.

Do you take lessons in being a moron or does it come naturally?

I think I'll bump my Daily Mail thread.
 
It's obvious you don't need any lessons. You're there, easily.

I'll borrow from Bertrand Russell, which is way too good for you, but still; because you haven't seen any evidence to the contrary, do you believe that there's a pink teapot orbiting the sun?
 
I'll borrow from Bertrand Russell, which is way too good for you, but still; because you haven't seen any evidence to the contrary, do you believe that there's a pink teapot orbiting the sun?

No. Any other questions?
 
Sigh. It's like trying to explain quantum electrodynamics to a gerbil.
 
Sigh. It's like trying to explain quantum electrodynamics to a gerbil.

No, idiot, you are too stupid to realize there is no reason to believe there's a pink teapot orbiting the sun, because there's no evidence that's the case. See how it works?
 
No, idiot, you are too stupid to realize there is no reason to believe there's a pink teapot orbiting the sun, because there's no evidence that's the case. See how it works?

The Mail was a big fan of Adolf and his policies. They haven't changed much.

Apparently they have, because I haven't seen any evidence to the contrary.

I'll borrow from Bertrand Russell, which is way too good for you, but still; because you haven't seen any evidence to the contrary, do you believe that there's a pink teapot orbiting the sun?

No. Any other questions?

http://i.imgur.com/6iYpooS.gif
 
Logic is something you heard about once and rejected as being too far fetched a concept, isn't it?
 
Bernie Sanders

It begins:

"Just how big of a problem is Bernie Sanders going to be for Hillary Clinton?"

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/...rnie-sanders-going-to-be-for-hillary-clinton/

"The conventional wisdom shared not just by conservatives but many Democrats is that self-described socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is so unrepresentative of mainstream American political thought that he cannot pose a serious threat to Hillary Clinton. It’s true that the former secretary of state remains the prohibitive favorite to win her party’s nomination in 2016, and there isn’t much evidence beyond the anecdotal that suggests Democrats are uncomfortable anointing her Barack Obama’s chosen successor. That dynamic might change, however, if Sanders runs against Clinton in a manner that former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley has so far refused; seriously and aggressively. He seems inclined to do just that.

“Why don’t you tell me what Hillary Clinton is campaigning on, do you know?” the always agitated Vermont senator told MSNBC’s Thomas Roberts earlier this month. “You don’t know and I don’t know and the American people don’t know.”

Sanders went on in that appearance to mock the media’s fascination with the spontaneity of Clinton’s Midwestern car trip in a vehicle dubbed “the Scooby Van.” That criticism was proven well-founded when reporters learned that Clinton’s innovative van trip was merely a reprise of a stunt from her 2000 U.S. Senate campaign that also featured a trip around New York in a van named “Scooby.”

But Sanders isn’t content to make snide remarks and to shame the Clinton-loving press. The Green Mountain State senator is running for president, and the punches he is throwing at Clinton aren’t feints. He intends to land some blows.

When asked by ABC News reporter Jonathan Karl about the continually evolving tales of financial improprieties out of the Clinton Foundation, Sanders called it “a very serious problem.”"
 
Hillary Clinton Battleground State Poll June 2015

Bad news for Hillary:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/268479165/Hillary-Clinton-Battleground-State-Poll-June-2015


"www.PopPolling.com
CLINTONFAV:
Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton? Favorable 42 Unfavorable 50 Not aware of her 1 Unsure 7 ________________________________________________________________________
BALLOT:
If the election for U.S. president were held today and the candidates were Democrat Hillary Clinton and the winner of the Republican nomination, for whom would you vote? Hillary Clinton 29 Lean Clinton 17 Lean Republican nominee 15 Republican nominee 32 Unsure 7
COLLAPSED:
Hillary Clinton 46 Republican nominee 47 Unsure 7
"
 
Bad news for Hillary:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/268479165/Hillary-Clinton-Battleground-State-Poll-June-2015


"www.PopPolling.com
CLINTONFAV:
Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of Hillary Clinton? Favorable 42 Unfavorable 50 Not aware of her 1 Unsure 7 ________________________________________________________________________
BALLOT:
If the election for U.S. president were held today and the candidates were Democrat Hillary Clinton and the winner of the Republican nomination, for whom would you vote? Hillary Clinton 29 Lean Clinton 17 Lean Republican nominee 15 Republican nominee 32 Unsure 7
COLLAPSED:
Hillary Clinton 46 Republican nominee 47 Unsure 7
"

Yeah, get back to us when both parties actually have their nominees.. "Unnamed Republican" usually does well in the polls. It's when they actually get around to naming that Republican that things have tended to go south for the GOP.
 
Yeah, get back to us when both parties actually have their nominees.. "Unnamed Republican" usually does well in the polls. It's when they actually get around to naming that Republican that things have tended to go south for the GOP.

Surely the Democrats can come up with a better candidate than Hillary. She's definitely beatable.
 
Internet polling - a stalwart of accuracy in public opinion. Take heed.
 
I hear Ted Cruz was wearing a tankini and a Fuller House do rag on the beach at Galveston.
 
I hear Ted Cruz was wearing a tankini and a Fuller House do rag on the beach at Galveston.

Romney is still the best candidate for the Republicans. Won't surprise me if he ends up running again. I think he could beat Hillary.
 
Romney is still the best candidate for the Republicans. Won't surprise me if he ends up running again. I think he could beat Hillary.

He'll never get the conservative christian vote because they consider Mormons a cult, not Christians.
"Real Conservatives" won't vote for him because he's too liberal. It cost him the last election because his positions on a number of issues left him unable to use the go to attacks of the right against President Obama without being exposed as a massive lying hypocrite.

He won't fare any better against the next Democratic candidate, whoever that is.
 
Back
Top