A Simple Question

She was elected Senator strictly based on personality, rather than anything she did. She LOST when she ran for the presidential nomination, as had Dan Quayle and many others before her. She was APPOINTED sec. of State, rather than doing anything to earn the position, and accomplished nothing positive once she took office.

The others you mentioned, except for Bush Sr., who was a member of the House before becoming VP, were all elected state governors before becoming pres.

So basically they were all less qualfied.
 
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101

She was elected Senator strictly based on personality, rather than anything she did. She LOST when she ran for the presidential nomination, as had Dan Quayle and many others before her. She was APPOINTED sec. of State, rather than doing anything to earn the position, and accomplished nothing positive once she took office.

The others you mentioned, except for Bush Sr., who was a member of the House before becoming VP, were all elected state governors before becoming pres.


So basically they were all less qualfied.

Huh? :confused: Generally speaking, the best qualifications are to be VP or the governor of a large state.
 
Bill O'Reilly asked a question where the answer could easily be found on Wikipedia?
 
She was elected Senator strictly based on personality, rather than anything she did. She LOST when she ran for the presidential nomination, as had Dan Quayle and many others before her. She was APPOINTED sec. of State, rather than doing anything to earn the position, and accomplished nothing positive once she took office.

The others you mentioned, except for Bush Sr., who was a member of the House before becoming VP, were all elected state governors before becoming pres.
So being elected a Governor is an accomplishment, but being elected a Senator is not?
 
So being elected a Governor is an accomplishment, but being elected a Senator is not?

Being elected to such an office is usually an accomplishment but, in the case of Hillary, she was elected with no particular qualifications except her name. She was not the first person to do this, and I am sure she will not be the last.
 
Being elected to such an office is usually an accomplishment but, in the case of Hillary, she was elected with no particular qualifications except her name. She was not the first person to do this, and I am sure she will not be the last.

In other words, usually it's a qualification to be elected to the Senate, but for her it's not, because you say so. :rolleyes:
 
We get it. You putzes can't stand her and don't want her to be President. Fine, vote for Cruz and quit your perpetual whining already. Or, as we say, stfu Miles.
 
Her followers support her and don't have a fucking clue why. They score a big fat zero.

Pathetic.
 
Poor Judenazi is upset that Libruls won't play defense.

PLAY DEFENSE, G-D DAMMIT!

#YCSDIAF
 
Throb is following me around into another thread. What were the odds?
 
In other words, usually it's a qualification to be elected to the Senate, but for her it's not, because you say so. :rolleyes:

In this case no, she was a carpetbagger who was anointed by Daniel Patric Moynihan who walked on water in NY. Yet another coronation.

Still waiting for an accomplishment.:rolleyes:
 
Poor Judenazi is upset that Libruls won't play defense.

PLAY DEFENSE, G-D DAMMIT!

#YCSDIAF

when we ask you why you support someone for the most imp office in the world

its not asking you to play defense

its a chance for you to tell us why and what she has done to merit the support

you cant

NO ONE CAN
 
when we ask you why you support someone for the most imp office in the world

its not asking you to play defense

its a chance for you to tell us why and what she has done to merit the support

you cant

NO ONE CAN

Throb is as well liked around here as a greasy fart in a crowded room.
 
OK, so do you have a factual accomplishment within HRC's political career that you would like to share with the class?
 
OK, so do you have a factual accomplishment within HRC's political career that you would like to share with the class?

Your compatriot has already admitted that being elected to the Senate is an accomplishment in and of itself. I would argue it's even more so for Mrs. Clinton given the political baggage she already carried around with her and the extreme animosity shown toward her by the "right".

The fact that YOU don't think that it's an accomplishment is irrelevant. In fact, it's BECAUSE of the attitudes displayed toward her that it IS an accomplishment. even with the "right" gunning for her at every turn she still was elected to the Senate. TWICE.

I'm aware that it annoys you and yours to no end, and it gives me great pleasure even though I have never been a supporter of Mrs. Clinton myself.
 
Last edited:
getting to the Senate......and she did WHAT THERE?

besides call a General a LIAR?
 
UD said getting elected was an accomplishment?????

They have nothing. Absolutely nothing.

Fucking hilarious.
 
Back
Top