A quick quiz

[Liar]

What is wrong with this picture?

http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e394/mi_liar/china_84.jpg

 

[Misty_Morning]

Chickens don't eat eggs.

 

[glynndah]

I know. I know. Chickens don't eat eggs.

Did I win?

 

[oggbashan]

What is wrong with this picture?

The chicken is the odd one out (unless it's a battery hen who might eat her eggs in desperation).

And who keeps chickens as pets?

Og

 

[glynndah]

Actually I have chickens in my back yard and they love to eat eggs.

 

[Liar]

I knew you guys were clever-ish and stuff.

 

[CrimsonMaiden]

Well, if you want to get technical about it, the dog doesn't eat its doghouse either.

 

[McKenna]

I missed it. I had to read the answer(s).

 

[Guest]

I couldn't figure out why a mouse would want a carrot, either.

 

[CrimsonMaiden]

I couldn't figure out why a mouse would want a carrot, either.

It's a bunny.

 

[Guest]

It's a bunny.

I know.

But at first I thought it was a little grey mouse.

 

[Boxlicker101]

I couldn't figure out why a mouse would want a carrot, either.

Mice probably eat carrots, but I think that's a bunny rabbit.

 

[Liar]

Mice probably eat carrots, but I think that's a bunny rabbit.

Why wouild a mouse eat a bunny rabbit?

 

[3113]

What is wrong with this picture?

http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e394/mi_liar/china_84.jpg

Well, actually, if we think of it in terms of "food" associations, than there's nothing wrong with it. It's not the chicken's fault that it's the only one of the three that "produces" a food rather than just consuming one.

And, yeah, we could have rabbit stew under the rabbit but I think that would disturb the kids.

 

[gauchecritic]

Why wouild a mouse eat a bunny rabbit?

Because it only has a picture of a carrot.

 

[Topanga_Blue]

And, yeah, we could have rabbit stew under the rabbit but I think that would disturb the kids.

Or you could have Chinese takeout under the cat...

 

[Fallenfromgrace]

Or you could have Chinese takeout under the cat...

bad bad ducky!

 

[maggot420]

Or you could have Chinese takeout under the cat...

Bwahahah

 

[Topanga_Blue]

Oh come on!

Don't tell me that I'm the only one that didn't think of that.

 

[Misty_Morning]

Ummm, I did...but didn't want to admit it.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Or you could have Chinese takeout under the cat...

Or under the dog, for that matter.

 

[only_more_so]

Although, you could look at it and say the dog is the odd one out since it's the only one with shelter. Or you could look at the entirety and say the pictures underneath the animals are things associated with that animal. In which case they all make perfect sense.

I once did an IQ test and there was no answer key (it was one of those tests were there are a bunch of symbols and you have to pick which symbol comes next, or fills in the blank). The test results were correlated to the answers that people with various IQ's gave. So if you answered the same way as geniuses, then you are a genius. If you answered the same way as imbeciles, then you are an imbecile.

Edit: Imbecile used to be a technical term for someone with an IQ between 25-50. IQs below that were idiots and between 50 and 75 were morons. I wish I could make stuff like that up!

 

[cantdog]

Although, you could look at it and say the dog is the odd one out since it's the only one with shelter. Or you could look at the entirety and say the pictures underneath the animals are things associated with that animal. In which case they all make perfect sense.

I once did an IQ test and there was no answer key (it was one of those tests were there are a bunch of symbols and you have to pick which symbol comes next, or fills in the blank). The test results were correlated to the answers that people with various IQ's gave. So if you answered the same way as geniuses, then you are a genius. If you answered the same way as imbeciles, then you are an imbecile.

Edit: Imbecile used to be a technical term for someone with an IQ between 25-50. IQs below that were idiots and between 50 and 75 were morons. I wish I could make stuff like that up!

You left out the cretins.

 

[gauchecritic]

Edit: Imbecile used to be a technical term for someone with an IQ between 25-50. IQs below that were idiots and between 50 and 75 were morons. I wish I could make stuff like that up!

Which is why I specifically don't use those terms and hate it when others do.

 

[BlackShanglan]

Well, actually, if we think of it in terms of "food" associations, than there's nothing wrong with it. It's not the chicken's fault that it's the only one of the three that "produces" a food rather than just consuming one.

Now they tell me. I've got no milk, a set of vicious scratches, and one ferociously angry cat.