A question for straights;

[TxRad]

Nope. You need to get a passport now.

On my passport, under sex, it says yes in big bold letters.

 

[mynameisben]

On my passport, under sex, it says yes in big bold letters.

That may get you in to some countries, but beware if you travel to the middle east.

 

[TxRad]

That may get you in to some countries, but beware if you travel to the middle east.

No problem there. I did one job in that area and decided it wasn't my cup of tea. Come to think about it it wasn't anyone's cup of tea since all stimulates were banned.

 

[voluptuary_manque]

Not all fled. Some were crazy and some didn't care for the snow and cold of Canada.

<<<<< One of the crazy ones. (I have the certificate the Marine Corp. gave me to prove it on the wall over my desk.) Also the beaches were warm and surfing good during the typhoons. (Further proof of crazy)

<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Another crazy one. I ended up with 29 years in and retired from the position of battalion sergeant major.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Sorry, sorry! You totally have my permission to spam political threads, okay?

Sheesh.

I don't think this would be considered Spam:

http://www.realhotsex.com/hosted/sites/bigleaguefacials/103/images/pic011.jpg

Spam is usually defined as advertising materials from somebody with whom the recipient does not have a business relationship. I sometimes order online from Amazon.com so ads from them are not spam. Ads from somebody offering to make my cock longer are spam because I have never done business with the senders.

This is a porn site. People who come here know it, and some of us even contribute pornographic stories to it. Therefore, porn is not spam on this site.

 

[JackLuis]

http://s3.amazonaws.com/rightnetwork-cms/1001642498/article/Don%20We%20Now.jpg?1292829630

Darn, and I had the green taffeta almost finished.

 

[Stella_Omega]

http://s3.amazonaws.com/rightnetwork-cms/1001642498/article/Don%20We%20Now.jpg?1292829630

Darn, and I had the green taffeta almost finished.

Oh come on, you can still wear it on RR.

 

[Darkniciad]

Dark, I want you to know that image has seriously brightened my day!

Hehe... Brightened my evening when I snapped it, too. I just took her private to get her out of an especially nasty room of begging chatmonkeys for a "paid break"

My plan was just to sit and chat in some peace and quiet, but Andra had other ideas *laugh* I'd been sort of teasing her for about an hour

Only post the small ones, because the full-size ones I gave to her to send out in emails to regulars who brightened her day, but couldn't afford private shows.

One more for the road from the same show:

http://www.darkniciad.com/ref_photos/andra_108.jpg

 

[Dragonlipz]

WTF are you talking about now? You threw out a couple of stats, but have spent the vast amount of your time telling me how bigoted I am. By your request, I've not asked you for a previous example of my bigotry. You did say that joining never appealed to you, and that was all the information I was looking for. Yet you keep pressing because you just know that there's some kind of trap. You and SR have convinced yourselves that you know more about me and my single question than I know.

It was an amazingly simple question: Did the policy keep you from joining?

The paranoid neurotic side of the board is off on a witch hunt because there MUST be something more.

Again, this is supposed to be a place full of open minded people, full of acceptance. Current events seem to dictate that it's just the opposite. If you're not a voted in part of the crowd, you're an evil person with subversive agendas. You've truly become everything you've always claimed to hate. Sorry if that doesn't sit well with you, but that's what it is now.

If you don't like that, maybe you should re-examine your approach to people that aren't your enemy asking a simple question.

Your argument that you reacted like that because other people have acted that way carries no weight at all. That makes you no different than the people that persecute all Muslims because of the actions of the terrorists.

WK dude - you are just one whiney, needy lil bitch.....d'ya miss the big house that much? Or do you enjoy reflecting all of the preconceived notions the rest of the world has about Kaintuck? You certainly are reinforcing those stereotypes....yes, indeed.....party on, Garth

 

[Wildcard Ky]

Did you run that post past Stella before posting it?

 

[JackLuis]

How times have changed.


Merry Christmas!

 

[amicus]

Most Americans know that aborition is an abomination, a sin, and one of the most insane laws ever passed in the US.

Most Americans are totall opposed to Gay marriage, note the 30 States where elections have turned it down.

Most Americans know that gay adoption of innocent children is a travesty.

Most Americans, by choice, do not associate with homosexuals and lesbians.

If the Tea Party and the new House majority doesn't turn back the Obama agenda and squelch the other social programs on the liberal/progressive agena, then you may indeed have a third party candidacy in 2012.

This social legislation is destructive to the moral fabric of a nation; it will not stand, there will be backlash, but I doubt if you ever hear of the numbers of gueers 'fragged' in combat zone, and there will be many.

This is Literotica, not a Porn site, and spamming political threads that you disagree with is childish and illustrates what one has called the moral and ethical vacuum of the Left.

That such a tiny active minority of obsessed perverts can actually influence events in the Nation's Capitol, it is time to throw all the rascals out, clean the slate and return to an honorable and ethical past.

It may well just happen.

Amicus

 

[Stella_Omega]

How times have changed.


Merry Christmas!

I know! I used to have to listen to that shit in real time, spoken to my face.

After walking twenty miles uphill in the snow-- both ways. Now i can hear it in the comfort of my own laptop, as our resident poster boy for Alzheimer's has just illustrated.

Amicus, please eat your own shit sandwich. Do not try to hand it off to anyone else.

 

[oggbashan]

Amicus' definitions of "most Americans" seem to suggest that "most Americans" are male, and are bigoted assholes who share many of the values of Afghanistan's Taleban.

I think Amicus is guilty of terminological inexactitude.

Og

 

[ExoMani]

I can attest that there were gays in the military way back when Richard ‘By God’ Nixon was president. (The ‘By God’ is sarcasm, for the benefit of those of you that don’t know me, which is all of you.)

I don’t recall anyone I served with much caring whether someone was gay, or not. I, also, don’t recall ‘gay’ being the term used to describe homosexuals, during the Vietnam War era. I remember the language being much cruder than that. In any case, the gays left me and my friends alone, and we left them alone.

That’s not to say there wasn’t a certain amount of, what would now be called, ‘gay bashing’ going on. There was, but there was no real heat in it. Derogatory terms for gays were used with about the same amount of emotion that guys from the south used when calling us northerners ‘Yankees’, and we northerners used when calling the southerners ‘rednecks’.

In truth, race was a much more emotional issue, back in the day.

 

[Stella_Omega]

Amicus' definitions of "most Americans" seem to suggest that "most Americans" are male, and are bigoted assholes who share many of the values of Afghanistan's Taleban.

I think Amicus is guilty of terminological inexactitude.

Og

And literotica is not a porn site, don't forget.

Good ol' Ami!

 

[Boxlicker101]

Most Americans know that aborition is an abomination, a sin, and one of the most insane laws ever passed in the US.

I wouldn't say "Most Americans," but I do agree a majority of Americans oppose abortion, except in certain instances. Those instances include rape or incest when the very young victim becomes pregnant. Most people believe abortion is the best solution in those cases. Personally, I favor abortion on demand, but I know I am in the minority.

Most Americans are totall opposed to Gay marriage, note the 30 States where elections have turned it down.

Once again, you are exaggerating. The majority of Americans probably oppose it, and that majority is steadily shrinking. Only a few, such as you, are "totally opposed" and some are equally strongly in favor of it. Most people don't care all that much, but a majority of the voters are enough against the idea to vote against same sex marriage. This will probably change in a few years.

Most Americans know that gay adoption of innocent children is a travesty.

Here I absolutely disagree with you. I believe virtually all Americans agree that children are usually better off living with natural or adoptive parents. They realize there are some homosexual pedophiles, but that most pedos either don't care about gender or lust in a heterosexual way.

Most Americans, by choice, do not associate with homosexuals and lesbians.

I disagree with you here too. Some might feel discomfitted around people who might be called "flaming pansies" or "bull dikes" but, other than that, don't much care what a person's sexual orientation. Moree often than not, they don't even know what it is.

If the Tea Party and the new House majority doesn't turn back the Obama agenda and squelch the other social programs on the liberal/progressive agena, then you may indeed have a third party candidacy in 2012.

This social legislation is destructive to the moral fabric of a nation; it will not stand, there will be backlash, but I doubt if you ever hear of the numbers of gueers 'fragged' in combat zone, and there will be many.

You might be right about the third party. The new House majority will be unable to repeal Obama's new laws before 2013 and their might be a third party, but I doubt it will amount to much. Only one third party has ever achieved much or lasted very long, and that was the GOP in the 19th century. Others, the Dixiecrats in 1948, The Bull Moose Party in 1912 and The AIP in 1968 have made a splash and even affected elections, but none have lasted more than briefly.

I doubt there will be much fragging of gay or lesbian troops, but there may be some, at least in the first few years.

This is Literotica, not a Porn site, and spamming political threads that you disagree with is childish and illustrates what one has called the moral and ethical vacuum of the Left.

That such a tiny active minority of obsessed perverts can actually influence events in the Nation's Capitol, it is time to throw all the rascals out, clean the slate and return to an honorable and ethical past.

It may well just happen.

Amicus[/QUOTE]

This is Literotica, and it IS a porn site, among other things. Being a major contributor of porn, I know of what I speak. Therefore, for reasons I said before, it is not Spam when I post pictures such as this one:


http://gallys.realitykings.com/pu/316/rebecca-blue-sneaky-nookie-pure18-pic-10.jpg

 

[Lord_Gro]

I want to ask you, how many young, straight men and women would actually WANT to enlist, if DADT is officially off the books? Would you encourage them, or do you worry about being attacked by their fellow troops?

I've been hanging around the military in one capacity or another (active duty, then drilling reservist, then DOD civilian employee,) for more than 30 years now. Attitudes change over time and from generation to generation. Whether the person next to you is gay is far less of an issue to the 19-year-olds whom we expect to do most of our fighting for us than their parents' generation imagines it to be. And most of the macho types who are doing all the pissing and moaning about the demise of DADT are doing so mostly because they are now scared shitless that some other man will start behaving toward them the way they have always behaved toward women.

 

[sr71plt]

And most of the macho types who are doing all the pissing and moaning about the demise of DADT are doing so mostly because they are now scared shitless that some other man will start behaving toward them the way they have always behaved toward women.

I don't follow. Who would be behaving toward the pissers and moaners? This doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

And as far as attitudes, it doesn't really make a difference what "most" think. It makes a difference what the one bad-assed, ready to do something, knuckle-dragging guy thinks (and does).

 

[Lord_Gro]

And as far as attitudes, it doesn't really make a difference what "most" think. It makes a difference what the one bad-assed, ready to do something, knuckle-dragging guy thinks (and does).

Already been through that one: in 1999, at Ft Campbell, KY, PFC Barry Winchell was beaten to death by PVT Calvin Glover, another soldier in his company, in part because Glover believed Winchell was gay. Glover was convicted of murder by a general court-martial and is currently serving a life term at the USADB at Fort Levenworth. Another soldier who egged Glover on was convicted as an accessory, received a lesser sentence, and was released a few years ago.

As long as commanders enforce the policy, and as long as the subalterns and NCO corps make it clear that that sort of thing is unacceptable, the problems are going to to be minimal. While people keep comparing this to the integration of the military after Truman's 1948 order, in a number of respects it's more like the wider integration of female personnel that took place in the 1980's. We survived that one OK.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

BOX

Most of the queers I know wanna force acceptance down your throat and ride your ass till you do.

 

[sr71plt]

Already been through that one: in 1999, at Ft Campbell, KY, PFC Barry Winchell was beaten to death by PVT Calvin Glover, another soldier in his company, in part because Glover believed Winchell was gay. Glover was convicted of murder by a general court-martial and is currently serving a life term at the USADB at Fort Levenworth. Another soldier who egged Glover on was convicted as an accessory, received a lesser sentence, and was released a few years ago.

As long as commanders enforce the policy, and as long as the subalterns and NCO corps make it clear that that sort of thing is unacceptable, the problems are going to to be minimal. While people keep comparing this to the integration of the military after Truman's 1948 order, in a number of respects it's more like the wider integration of female personnel that took place in the 1980's. We survived that one OK.

Winchell didn't survive that one, now did he?

But, hey, that you feel that everything is OK and politically correct is the only point, right?

Still don't understand what you were trying to say in your earlier post.