A little murder

Ishmael

Literotica Guru
Joined
Nov 24, 2001
Posts
84,005
He was an ordinary man that lived in a small village in the shadow of some hills in a faraway place. Middle aged and respected he had risen to be the headman for his village. The village itself was like so many others in the area. The huts were a combination of bamboo, thatch, and wood. Well trod paths of dirt or mud depending on when it had last rained. The land around the village was cleared and fertile. It provided for the village needs and yielded enough surpluses that they could trade for goods with those villages further away less blessed of soil.

Life in the village was much as it was a hundred years ago. The pace of life was slow and events unfolded in a regular pattern. From the first planting to the harvest, to the various holidays and ceremonial occasions all events were planned months, if not years in advance. That's the way things had been for generations in the past and no one foresaw any changes in the future. Visitors were few and always treated with courtesy and hospitality.

One day the village was visited by a group of men. Young men carrying guns. They were welcomed in and shown the traditional hospitality. These men spoke with the villagers of many things. How everyone owned the land. How they were being robbed of the fruits of their labors. They spoke of many things political and foreign to the life of the villagers. Though they didn't understand what most of these men spoke of, they listened with attentiveness. Nodding their heads as these men spoke. Of course, these men believed that the villagers were nodding their heads in agreement, not that the villagers were merely being polite and only signaling that they were listening to the words. Not that the people agreed with them, or even understood. These men demanded that the villagers give them grain to sustain them and their effort, what ever that might have been. The headsman discussed this with the villagers and although they all agreed that these men were rude in their demands, that they would provide for them as they had so many other guests.

Over the next few months the village was visited by similar men, sometimes the same men. All with the same words, all with the same demands. And then one day foreign men came among them. This was quite an event. The headman was an educated man, he'd been to the Catholic missionary school for two years and was quite well rounded. The tall white men he recognized as those quite similar to those that had taught him at the school. But the black men were quite an item of interest to the village, because although they had heard of such a thing, there was a belief that it was just talk, like that of demons and Gods. These men were also armed with guns, but they made no demands. They offered medical care and even provided the children with treats rare and unknown. They asked of the other men that had visited as well. The headsman was a shrewd man and quickly surmised that their interest was less than friendly. He gave vague information to these strangers. Not to protect the other men, but to protect his village. He wanted no warfare to disturb the peace of so many years.

It was quite a balancing act for the headsman. To provide information to both groups, but not so much that either would have advantage over the other. You see, the first men to visit the village were interested in the foreigners as much as the foreigners were interested in them. This dangerous state of affairs continued for quite some time.

Two men on a hill overlooking the village. One with a bolt action rifle and range finding scope, the other with field glasses and a standard issue rifle. For three days they had worked their way to this particular spot. To observe the village and its people. They saw a meeting begin, the headsman walking around and talking to his fellow villagers. As the headsman finished speaking he went to the top of the encircled people and stood in silence to allow others to speak. One mans finger tightened on a trigger.

The bullet struck the headsman in the sternum. There was no dramatic movement of the body. Blood did not gout as one sees in Hollywood features. Like a marionette that had all the strings cut at once, he just crumpled to the ground. His wife and two daughters were moving towards their husband and father before the report of the distant shot ever reached the village. The other villagers stood in stunned silence.

Once upon a time in a far away land a man died for playing both ends against the middle. He was merely attempting to protect his village and it's people. With no evil intent at all. He didn't realize that when events are thrust upon us sides must be taken. And while in the taking of sides he might have come to the same fate, at least he would have died for something. Because in the end, he died for no reason at all.

Ishmael

As a theoretical question, how does the above story relate to France?
 
Last edited:
Ishmael said:
1. Once upon a time in a far away land a man died for playing both ends against the middle.

2. He was merely attempting to protect his village and it's people. With no evil intent at all.

3. He didn't realize that when events are thrust upon us sides must be taken.

4. And while in the taking of sides he might have come to the same fate, at least he would have died for something.

5. Because in the end, he died for no reason at all.

Ishmael

Okay, I'll bite....

1. He died because he was the leader of a village targeted for hostile acquisition by two competing foreign powers.

2. Agreed.

3. He took a side. The side of his village. The status quo is always an option in any decision making process. As you said, he might have died anyway. He chose loyalty to his values and those of his society. He was courageous for so doing rather than selling out.

4. He did die for something. He was the leader of a peaceful, prosperous happy village where he had a wife and children. He stood for all of that and died leading his people.

5. His death was unecessary and as you said, given his village was caught between two warring foreign powers, he might have died anyway. There was no good reason for his death, but that doesn't negate his achievements.

Lance
 
Re: Re: A little murder

Lancecastor said:
Okay, I'll bite....

1. He died because he was the leader of a village targeted for hostile acquisition by two competing foreign powers.

2. Agreed.

3. He took a side. The side of his village. The status quo is always an option in any decision making process. As you said, he might have died anyway. He chose loyalty to his values and those of his society. He was courageous for so doing rather than selling out.

4. He did die for something. He was the leader of a peaceful, prosperous happy village where he had a wife and children. He stood for all of that and died leading his people.

5. His death was unecessary and as you said, given his village was caught between two warring foreign powers, he might have died anyway. There was no good reason for his death, but that doesn't negate his achievements.

Lance

Think down one more layer at least. It isn't that simple. Nothing ever is.

Ishmael
 
So is your point ...... sometimes you're damned if you and damned if you don't?
 
Last edited:
Re: Re: Re: A little murder

Ishmael said:
Think down one more layer at least. It isn't that simple. Nothing ever is.

Ishmael

Don't worry, that was a diversion post....I'm on it!
decoder.gif
 
Just a 'thank you' to all that read this. Even if you didn't 'vote'. :)

Ishmael
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: A little murder

I had to upgrade...I'll be with you shortly!
enigma.jpg
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A little murder

Lancecastor said:
I had to upgrade...I'll be with you shortly!

What, you couldn't find a picture of Chuck Babbages engine? :)

Ishmael
 
I'm impressed

either of ISHs writing skills
and the impetus of that short story

I still have to think about it. You've left me speechless somehow.
 
He died for peace. His own peolpe's as well as that of his visitors.
 
Death is never meaningless or without reason.

We just may never fully know or understand the impact, the ripples left in the wake of the life of someone.
 
MissTaken said:
Death is never meaningless or without reason.

We just may never fully know or understand the impact, the ripples left in the wake of the life of someone.

As usual MissTaken makes a very good point.

We never know how our actions or inactions will affect our lives. The head of the village was in a "no win" situation, he probably knew this, even if he never expressed his thoughts to anyone.

Under the same circumstances, most of us would have done the same, not in an attempt to play both ends against the middle, but to try and maintain the status quo. He knew his ppl were no match for the 2 warring powers. Just as I'd imagine he knew the cost of his actions when he was no longer useful to one side or the other, or when he was viewed as a threat by one side or the other. Yet he did the best he could do, and being a leader, probably did it without regret.

Ultimately, both the sniper in the story, and the headman were in much the same situation. Caught in the middle, just doing the best they could do under the circumstances. Trying to maintain the status quo, but damned if they did and damned if they didn't.

JMHO
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A little murder

Ishmael said:
What, you couldn't find a picture of Chuck Babbages engine? :)

Ishmael

I'm not as old as you; I'm more a Univac guy. Ha!

But while I have my legion of hamsters cracking your code to figure out who you are talking about, here's your tech hero and his engine...
charlesbabbage1.jpg
 
*goddess*emi* said:
As usual MissTaken makes a very good point.

We never know how our actions or inactions will affect our lives. The head of the village was in a "no win" situation, he probably knew this, even if he never expressed his thoughts to anyone.

Under the same circumstances, most of us would have done the same, not in an attempt to play both ends against the middle, but to try and maintain the status quo. He knew his ppl were no match for the 2 warring powers. Just as I'd imagine he knew the cost of his actions when he was no longer useful to one side or the other, or when he was viewed as a threat by one side or the other. Yet he did the best he could do, and being a leader, probably did it without regret.

Ultimately, both the sniper in the story, and the headman were in much the same situation. Caught in the middle, just doing the best they could do under the circumstances. Trying to maintain the status quo, but damned if they did and damned if they didn't.

JMHO

Perseptive observations 'ge' and MissT.

Is the 'ripple' of the act limited to the victim's?

Ishmael
 
Ishmael said:
Perseptive observations 'ge' and MissT.

Is the 'ripple' of the act limited to the victim's?

Ishmael

Nothing is ever limited to just one or two players in life. Every action and reaction we have, cause and effect, we won't be the only ones who are effected by our decisions.

Things that leave us scarred, emotionally hurt we carry with us and without realizing it, it leaves a mark on everyone we touch.
 
No, Ish.

The "ripple affect" is not limited to the man who died.

I would only reiterate what his_kitty said if I were to go on further.
 
MissTaken said:
No, Ish.

The "ripple affect" is not limited to the man who died.

I would only reiterate what his_kitty said if I were to go on further.


Again, I agree with MT, except to add that the ripples continue, even to include those of us who have read the story.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A little murder

Lancecastor said:
I'm not as old as you; I'm more a Univac guy. Ha!

But while I have my legion of hamsters cracking your code to figure out who you are talking about, here's your tech hero and his engine...
charlesbabbage1.jpg

Hey Lance . . . we had one of those Babbage Machine Things at school . . . but it was Lady Astor, his wife, who was the mathematical brains behind the operation . . .

Ishmael . . . your parable sounds just like a CIA action in a third world country . . .
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A little murder

Don K Dyck said:
Hey Lance . . . we had one of those Babbage Machine Things at school . . . but it was Lady Astor, his wife, who was the mathematical brains behind the operation . . .

Ishmael . . . your parable sounds just like a CIA action in a third world country . . .

The CIA is everywhere. :)

Ishmael
 
I think you're boring and need to mind your own business, and let us mind ours.
 
Ishmael said:


Once upon a time in a far away land a man died for playing both ends against the middle. He was merely attempting to protect his village and it's people. With no evil intent at all. He didn't realize that when events are thrust upon us sides must be taken. And while in the taking of sides he might have come to the same fate, at least he would have died for something. Because in the end, he died for no reason at all.

Ishmael


Life's a game, not a test. There is no right or wrong. That he died for nothing is your value judgement. (Anyway, he died for something: to make a point in your parable ;) )

Thanks for your parantable. It is very instructive to see how people view their world.

May you find meaning in your actions,

the Drake
 
Re: Re: A little murder

TheDR4KE said:
Life's a game, not a test. There is no right or wrong. That he died for nothing is your value judgement. (Anyway, he died for something: to make a point in your parable ;) )

Thanks for your parantable. It is very instructive to see how people view their world.

May you find meaning in your actions,

the Drake

LOL Well, that was presumptious.

Of course he died for something. Everyone who reads gets the opportunity to figure out for what. And to consider what difference his death made to who. You have your perspective, others have differing views. I think that's a good thing.

Parable, story, both? It's just a little vignette of life.

Ishmael
 
Back
Top