A femdom lovers dream

[CharleyH]

I love this town!

Longshuihu Village

I have always found Asian countries to be a bit dreamy and romantic in my imagination. In fact, aside from roaming the whole of the Mediterranean, one lifelong travel dream has been touring Indonesia, the Philippines, Laos, Thailand, Japan etcetera. I'd never really thought to hit up China, but I must admit that this location in China seriously piqued my interest. I doubt I will be running to invest in it any time soon, but I think a town like this would be worth more of an intriguing visit than a trip to the local dungeon.

 

[CharleyH]

No one has answered, but still, I think this is one KICK ASS town. After all, what town can boast "Every chick is a Domme!"

 

[Spawn_of_Cloudy]

No one has answered, but still, I think this is one KICK ASS town. After all, what town can boast "Every chick is a Domme!"

That town looks scary >.<

 

[3113]

That town looks scary >.<

What? It doesn't remind you of home

 

[FatDino]

What? It doesn't remind you of home

You're so gonna get in trouble for this.

 

[3113]

You're so gonna get in trouble for this.

I know. I'm already hiding from Cloudy....

 

[FatDino]

I know. I'm already hiding from Cloudy....

She's probably having dinner.

Seriously though, the fact that there's a "women's town" in a traditionally male dominant country is...well, shocking. I think I should move to China.

 

[3113]

Seriously though, the fact that there's a "women's town" in a tradionally male dominant country is...well, shocking. I think I should move to China.

I dunno. I think that it's not so surprising that in a country that big, there might be a matriarchy; a part where, for whatever reason, women ended up in charge and that's just the way it's been for generations. Nor that in a male dominated country, where men are espected to be always in charge and making decisions, that there might be strong sexual fantasies of female domination where the man can be, for a while, free of such responsiblities.

There's also this interesting psychological practice in human cultures where reversal is used as a way of cutting lose. For example, there are old holidays where the tradition was that servants and children got to lord it over masters/adults. Both sides used this topsy-turvy holiday to cut lose from their usual, rigid structure. It doesn't quite surprise me that a "holiday" for some Asian males would include such role-reversal as being bossed around by women.

 

[amicus]

Chuckles, CharlieH, in your dreams, baby....such a deal.

amicus...

 

[cloudy]

Not all that new a concept, although the idea of "punishment" is amusing. Many ancient societies/cultures are matriarchal. Makes perfect sense to me.

 

[amicus]

[QUOTE=cloudy]Not all that new a concept, although the idea of "punishment" is amusing. Many ancient societies/cultures are matriarchal. Makes perfect sense to me.[/QUOTE]


~~~

I don't want to start or even continue an argument with you Cloudy, however, a Matriarchy makes no sense to me at all.

And although you think and said in another post, that you consider my views male dominated and anti feminine, I contend I am neither but only reflect in my views the basic nature of the male and female and their relationship to each other.

There are exceptions of course. There have been Matriarchal societies in the past; women have ruled nations before and one can find matriarchal behavior in the primate world if one chooses to emphasize that.

You accuse me of 'stereotyping' when I utilize the 'natural' agressive, unemotional nature of men in general or the natural passive passive, emotional nature of women in my assumptions and conclusions.

I doubt I will ever get over or around that 'opinion' of yours, which is why I said I do not want to begin or continue an argument. Thus I leave you with the question: do you really mean that a 'matriarchy', makes good sense to you or are you just continuing the mantra?

amicus...

 

[cloudy]

I don't want to start or even continue an argument with you Cloudy, however, a Matriarchy makes no sense to me at all.

And although you think and said in another post, that you consider my views male dominated and anti feminine, I contend I am neither but only reflect in my views the basic nature of the male and female and their relationship to each other.

There are exceptions of course. There have been Matriarchal societies in the past; women have ruled nations before and one can find matriarchal behavior in the primate world if one chooses to emphasize that.

You accuse me of 'stereotyping' when I utilize the 'natural' agressive, unemotional nature of men in general or the natural passive passive, emotional nature of women in my assumptions and conclusions.

I doubt I will ever get over or around that 'opinion' of yours, which is why I said I do not want to begin or continue an argument. Thus I leave you with the question: do you really mean that a 'matriarchy', makes good sense to you or are you just continuing the mantra?

amicus...

Why wouldn't it make sense?

Men and women are different, yes, but neither gender is inherently "better," so a matriarchy would make just as much sense as a patriarchy.

Perfectly logical, unless you believe that one gender is "superior" to the other, and I don't.

 

[amicus]

[QUOTE=cloudy]Why wouldn't it make sense?

Men and women are different, yes, but neither gender is inherently "better," so a matriarchy would make just as much sense as a patriarchy.

Perfectly logical, unless you believe that one gender is "superior" to the other, and I don't.[/QUOTE]

~~~

'Superior' is your choice of word, not necessarily mine.

Since you agree that men and women are different, why don't we begin there?

I will even offer a caveat; that men can choose to be more, 'feminine', if they wish, just as women can choose to be more 'masculine' in their behavior, if they wish, for whatever reason one chooses.

It may also be a matter of circumstance and/or necessity when one gender is required to take on aspects of the other to meet needs and requirements that arise for any number of reasons.

Most of us are heavily influenced by our society and our institutions of religion, education and family customs and expectations.

For the past half century there has been a 'push' throughout much of our society for women to become more assertive and aggressive and for men to become more sensitive, compassionate and emotional.

This may or may not be a good thing, I suppose, depending on your point of view.

The degree of masculinity or femininity a person displays is somewhat a matter of choice and nurture, I suppose, but on a deeper level, I think we are each born with a level of both that we find comfortable and that satisfies our image of ourselves.

Psychological well being and health must also be considered, I suggest as mental illness and instability are still determined to be aberrations in behavior. I contend that loss of sexual identity because of social pressures and influences can challenge the mental health of a person.

Now that was fairly general, I think, although you no doubt understand the direction my comments are moving toward.

I suggest there is a 'normative' state of sexuality in each person, a state that can be understood and dealt with.

I think I best leave it there.

amicus...

 

[cloudy]

Superior is your choice of word, not necessarily mine.

Since you agree that men and women are different, why don't we begin there?

I will even offer a caveat; that men can choose to be more, 'feminine', if they wish, just as women can choose to be more 'masculine' in their behavior, if they wish, for whatever reason one chooses.

It may also be a matter of circumstance and/or necessity when one gender is required to take on aspects of the other to meet needs and requirements that arise for any number of reasons.

Most of us are heavily influenced by our society and our institutions of religion, education and family customs and expectations.

For the past half century there has been a 'push' throughout much of our society for women to become more assertive and aggressive and for men to become more sensitive, compassionate and emotional.

This may or may not be a good thing, I suppose, depending on your point of view.

The degree of masculinity or femininity a person displays is somewhat a matter of choice and nurture, I suppose, but on a deeper level, I think we are each born with a level of both that we find comfortable and that satisfies our image of ourselves.

Psychological well being and health must also be considered, I suggest as mental illness and instability are still determined to be aberrations in behavior. I contend that loss of sexual identity because of social pressures and influences can challenge the mental health of a person.

Now that was fairly general, I think, although you no doubt understand the direction my comments are moving toward.

I suggest there is a 'normative' state of sexuality in each person, a state that can be understood and dealt with.

I think I best leave it there.

amicus...

Oh, ami...your selective view of history is amusing, at times. Among my people, women have been warriors for thousands of years. Doesn't make them any less feminine, or any less of a woman. In fact, the women were known to be particularly fierce...maybe it's because we had our children at home waiting.

Women are just as capable of leadership as a man, and you'll never convince me, and many others, otherwise. There's just no basis for believing the opposite, unless you think that having a penis is a requirement.

 

[amicus]

Cloudy, it seems to me you just want to defend your viewpoint and belittle mine and if that is your choice, then of course, do so.

There are men's sports and women's sports; they do not compete with each other because males are by nature, stronger, taller and built differently than women. There is a distinct gender difference and an ethnic or a racial one also, to note the apparent superiority of Africans in competition in many areas.

Women can be 'warriors' indeed, and as you state, have been before.

It is true that women can do just about every thing men do and most times just as well, if not better.

But that begs the question, I think, and since I search for knowledge, not to defend my viewpoint, is is necessary for me in my search for truth, to try to get to the root of the matter, whatever it is.

Throughout most of human history, nature and circumstances have dictated the roles men and women assumed in a communal setting, be it tribe or village or town, it remained pretty much the same in all of recorded history.

My point is and always has been on this subject, that modern times have freed both men and women from previously heavy physical effort in order to just survive, to an era wherein the choice of one's avocation is a matter of choice.

Social customs, traditions and ritual have in many cases, hindered that liberation from physical labor as it was not 'acceptable' to society for some groups of people to do certain things.

That is not the focus of my search. Rather it is to attempt to understand and comprehend just what modern roles can satisfy our basic fundamental nature in all aspects of our existence.

amicus...

 

[Spawn_of_Cloudy]

Main problem I'd have with living there is the fact that women are a lot meaner then guys are...

 

[FatDino]

Main problem I'd have with living there is the fact that women are a lot meaner then guys are...

Define "mean."

 

[Spawn_of_Cloudy]

Define "mean."

Well...I've seen 2 men fight and they fight by hitting each other with fists and sometimes never hit the crotch. This is not true in all cases so please do not take it that way.

Women will pull hair, slam into wall, other things like that anything just to make the other person feel as much pain as possible. This of course is not true in all cases so please don't take it that way.

In other words women can cause a lot more pain then a man would, and some just wanna see others suffer *cough*janice*cough* (my step mom).

 

[FatDino]

Well...I've seen 2 men fight and they fight by hitting each other with fists and sometimes never hit the crotch. This is not true in all cases so please do not take it that way.

Women will pull hair, slam into wall, other things like that anything just to make the other person feel as much pain as possible. This of course is not true in all cases so please don't take it that way.

In other words women can cause a lot more pain then a man would, and some just wanna see others suffer *cough*janice*cough* (my step mom).

Two men would fight in a honorable way, you mean?

Well, how many wars in history can you name that weren't caused by men's greed? Men desire wealth, power and fame much stronger than women. You can say that women are mean, but they don't lead hundreds of thousands of other women to fight against other empires. Men did, and still are.

 

[Spawn_of_Cloudy]

Two men would fight in a honorable way, you mean?

Well, how many wars in history can you name that weren't caused by men's greed? Men desire wealth, power and fame much stronger than women. You can say that women are mean, but they don't lead hundreds of thousands of other women to fight against other empires. Men did, and still are.

Men are more outwardly mean but not as mean as women
Women don't usally act mean but when they do they are a lot meaner then men.
And yes men lead people to war and i hate the men that do it they give men a bad name in my opinion.

 

[FatDino]

Men are more outwardly mean but not as mean as women
Women don't usally act mean but when they do they are a lot meaner then men.
And yes men lead people to war and i hate the men that do it they give men a bad name in my opinion.

Just like the "mean" women you just mentioned.

Not all women hold such strong a grudge against others.

 

[Spawn_of_Cloudy]

Just like the "mean" women you just mentioned.

Not all women hold such strong a grudge against others.

Its true just like not all men are people that wanna war with everyone.

 

[FatDino]

Its true just like not all men are people that wanna war with everyone.

I only said it because you generalized all women were "meaner" than men.

 

[Spawn_of_Cloudy]

I only said it because you generalized all women were "meaner" than men.

Well i ment it as most didn't really mean it as all sorry.

 

[3113]

I only said it because you generalized all women were "meaner" than men.

Now, now. Don't pick on Spawn. He did qualify his points the first time and there's no reason to make him qualify them repeatedly. That's just mean....and proves his point