7.8% When he took office / 7.9% today

[ChinaBandit]

Well, Mr. "One term proposition" the unemployment rate is actually higher today than when you took office. 12.3 million jobless. Millions more under-employed. Millions more who have simply given up and fallen out of the work force all together.

Why do you deserve 4 more years based on these points alone? Tell me, nice and slow about all the economic progress you've achieved.

I don't get it. Anything you can, could and will say is bullshit!

 

[Disgustipated]

Well, Mr. "One term proposition" the unemployment rate is actually higher today than when you took office. 12.3 million jobless. Millions more under-employed. Millions more who have simply given up and fallen out of the work force all together.

Why do you deserve 4 more years based on these points alone? Tell me, nice and slow about all the economic progress you've achieved.

I don't get it. Anything you can, could and will say is bullshit!

You are a boring twatsicle. Shut the fuck up, you whiny bitch. Plus, your wife is an ugly cunt, please change that av, loser.

 

[Wrong Element]

Well, Mr. "One term proposition" the unemployment rate is actually higher today than when you took office.

One could have said the same thing to Ronald Reagan, who as you might recall was easily re-elected.

 

[unregistered]

 

[JohnnySavage]

But you leave out the why.

The best Hollywood remake ever.


They should name a ship after him and put it in Johnny's thread.

That reminds me...

 

[willyeddy2001]

7.8 when he took office?

i don't think so china go back to 2008 and check the numbers. unemployment was way higher back then.

 

[doctor_insanus]

I guess you'd prefer the 10% rate from the worst of the recession? Of course you would, because you'd rather America fail than re-elect President Obama.

 

[RobDownSouth]

You are a boring twatsicle. Shut the fuck up, you whiny bitch. Plus, your wife is an ugly cunt, please change that av, loser.

He's a whiny bitch Marine, just like his pals AJ and vetty.

 

[Adre]

He's a whiny bitch Marine, just like his pals AJ and vetty.

It's a wonder we've won wars when you hear these crybabies prattle on.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You are a boring twatsicle. Shut the fuck up, you whiny bitch. Plus, your wife is an ugly cunt, please change that av, loser.

That's all they have.

That's all we heard during the Bush years.

They have come to the conclusion that the only way they can win is nasty.

I bitched about Bush for six years, and through all that time the Republicans on this board never trashed me the way the Democrats do now that "their guy" is "in charge."

They were angry when Bush was President, but they seem even more angry now that Obama is President.

Maybe it's just disappointment.

Man, if Romney pulls off a miracle, there will be no use even trying to post here...

 

[Adre]

That's all they have.

That's all we heard during the Bush years.

They have come to the conclusion that the only way they can win is nasty.



Man, if Romney pulls off a miracle, there will be no use even trying to post here...

You'd rather we all be nice like Karl Rove I guess?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You'd rather we all be nice like Karl Rove I guess?

No, I love your snide sarcastic remarks when you have nothing positive to say.



Keep up the good "Independent" behavior.

 

[TWB]

I think I would like a twatsicle. Not a boring one, but a twatsicle just the same.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Here we go again! Economists: Employment gains are ‘implausibly high’
James Pethokoukis
November 2, 2012

Recall all the eyebrows that were raised last month at the huge jump, nearly 900,000 jobs — in the September household jobs survey conducted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The last time the economy added that many, it was growing at a white-hot 9.3% — not 2%. And it was way out of line with the more well known payroll survey.

The results led Gallup’s chief economist to say that the “household results should be discounted. … The obvious conclusion is that a new employment measure is needed.”

But in October we had another mega-month, at least according to that survey. Household employment jumped 410,000. Here is the economics team of John Ryding

Conrad DeQuadros at RDQ Economics:

The economic data for October continue to be relatively upbeat as the gain in payrolls and the upward revision to employment growth in the prior two months put the level of payrolls in October some 255,000 above the previously reported level for September. The employment gains in the household survey (about 1.3 million over the last two months) are implausibly high and we still expect to see an eight-handle on the unemployment rate again before the end of the year.

Translation: Unemployment is headed back to the 8% level after the election.

http://www.aei-ideas.org/2012/11/here-we-go-again-economist-employment-gains-are-implausibly-high/

 

[RobDownSouth]

Here we go again! Economists: Employment gains are ‘implausibly high’
James Pethokoukis
November 2, 2012


http://www.aei-ideas.org/2012/11/here-we-go-again-economist-employment-gains-are-implausibly-high/

Of course, to True Believers like AJ, anything that doesn't fit The Narrative is by definition "Implausibly High".

 

[jeninflorida]

Of course, to True Believers like AJ, anything that doesn't fit The Narrative is by definition "Implausibly High".

smoking the obama juice...isn't it kind of early for that?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

smoking the obama juice...isn't it kind of early for that?

You just made his day.

Stop quoting idiots. He thinks he can "get" to me...

 

[RobDownSouth]

You just made his day.

Stop quoting idiots. He thinks he can "get" to me...

I'm not talking "to" you, my situational Native American friend.

I'm talking "about" you, mocking your hypocrisy, double standards and lack of personal integrity.

 

[mercury14]

Here we go again! Economists: Employment gains are ‘implausibly high’
James Pethokoukis
November 2, 2012

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Given the complete distortions of reality with respect to not counting people who allegedly dropped out of the work force, it is easy to misrepresent the headline numbers.

Digging under the surface, the drop in the unemployment rate over the past two years is nothing but a statistical mirage. Things are much worse than the reported numbers indicate.

Finally, before anyone gets too excited about this jobs report, note that it is just one month, and it may be revised away. Even if not, take another look at the index of aggregate hours and average wages vs. CPI because those charts reflect very important stories not at all seen in the headline numbers.

Read more at http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/#k1sjmQcZiLBCCjXq.99

 

[unregistered]

 

[RobDownSouth]

Read more at http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/#k1sjmQcZiLBCCjXq.99

I'll tell you the same thing I told your Vettebigot buddy, Chief HoMoNoMo: Blame Hitler.

The Babby Boom started in 1946, the first retirees came in 2011 (2011-1945=65 years old), and 10,000 boomers retire every single day now.

Stick that in your peace pipe and smoke it.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Black unemployment jumped as well.

Why would white Democrats worry about this?

Their entire schtick is built around they idea that blacks "need" them...


The more out of work, the greater the need.

 

[mercury14]

Read more at http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/#k1sjmQcZiLBCCjXq.99

Conservatives told us last month to just wait for the revisions because the report was better than you wanted it to be. So let's see what the revisions were for last month.

The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for August was revised from +142,000 to +192,000, and the change for September was revised from +114,000 to +148,000.

www.bls.gov

So after the revisions totaled +84,000 jobs... you want us to wait for further revisions?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Yeah massah!