7,200 yr old porn...

[Halo_n_horns]

Check this out...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/germany/article/0,2763,1451509,00.html

The cool thing here is that we have even more physical proof that sex, and art, is older than the Bible's "Adam and Eve" affair. The bad thing here is that these pieces have so readily been referred to as "porn" rather something natural that was being artisically rendered.

 

[Softouch911]

AT 7200 years and still screwing, I shouldn't feel bad for him. But they named the poor bastard "Adonis von Zschernitz."

In English does that translate to "Adonis Sneezing"?

I'm not sure what to say except send a sympathy card.





Softouch

 

[Halo_n_horns]

AT 7200 years and still screwing, I shouldn't feel bad for him. But they named the poor bastard "Adonis von Zschernitz."

In English does that translate to "Adonis Sneezing"?

I'm not sure what to say except send a sympathy card.





Softouch

With a quaint "bless you" in really small text...

 

[Virtual_Burlesque]

. . . The bad thing here is that these pieces have so readily been referred to as "porn" rather something natural that was being artisically rendered.

Halo_n_horns,
This was reported in http://image.guardian.co.uk/sitelogos/Guardian.gif after all.


If the Headline had mentioned ART, who would have read it?


"Until now, there have been discoveries of clay models of women with large breasts and bottoms,
which have always been interpreted as connected with fertility. "


Natuarally! What else would large jugs and a big wazzu make an academic think of,
besides crop yeilds?

 

[Halo_n_horns]

Halo_n_horns,
This was reported in http://image.guardian.co.uk/sitelogos/Guardian.gif after all.


If the Headline had mentioned ART, who would have read it?


"Until now, there have been discoveries of clay models of women with large breasts and bottoms,
which have always been interpreted as connected with fertility. "


Natuarally! What else would large jugs and a big wazzu make an academic think of,
besides crop yeilds?

Damn prudes and their virginal, unimaginative sense of writing styles.

 

[LadyJeanne]

Damn prudes and their virginal, unimaginative sense of writing styles.

The article didn't mention that his penis was 10 inches and that her boobs were 44DDD, so, all in all, not the worst writing style.

I think we must be the prudes. Why would we assume that sex was a taboo subject in the stone age? Just because it is now? I mean, those archeologists thought these figurines might have been posed dancing rather than fucking doggy style.

Yay for stone age sex!

 

[minsue]

I'm confused. The article mentions more than once the apparently common notion that sex was "a taboo subject in the stone age". Who in god's name would think that and why?!?

 

[SeaCat]

I'm confused. The article mentions more than once the apparently common notion that sex was "a taboo subject in the stone age". Who in god's name would think that and why?!?

Ummmm, errrrrrr, American Scholars?

Cat

 

[bobwhitecrow]

All I have to say, is . . .

Zug Zug