512 Architects & Engineering Professionals

[unregistered]

 

[rat_patrol]

All I remember was her stretching your asshole over a rain barrel, watch out there may still be a couple around here.

I just gave you her logic.

Your memory and what was actually said are very different.

I remember her saying the word "idiot" about 50 times. Typical response of someone who has been proven wrong and has nothing else.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Bad_Doggie]

What happened on 9/11?

The government IS hiding something.

Their own incompetence.

Oh and it was all going so well!

You should’ve stopped there. After that it is a down hill trip into fantasy land.

Woof!

 

[rat_patrol]

Turd, give it up. If it were only remotely true Obummer would have been preaching it from the rooftops the last two years. The entire nation would have every aspect of the conspiracy memorized by now.

No he wouldn't. To do so would undermine the people's respect and trust in the government that is supposed to protect them.

The only thing the government is hiding is their own incompetence.

Every aspect of our security and intel. was compromised. The terrorists knew exactly when to strike. They had access to all our plans in advance.

 

[rat_patrol]

Oh and it was all going so well!

You should’ve stopped there. After that it is a down hill trip into fantasy land.

Woof!

How so, and how do you know for sure?

 

[unregistered]

 

[rat_patrol]

Sorry Turd, it doesn't fly.

Of course not, to admit all this would be to admit total failure of our most trusted establishments.

http://www.willthomasonline.net/willthomasonline/Command_Override.html

 

[Bad_Doggie]

My memory concurs with Vetteman. The out come for you was quite bad. Funny though.

You mean apart from….there being no evidence that such a device as you describe existing, no seismic records of such a device being set off, no video or audio evidence of such a device being set off, the core or part of the core remaining standing after the collapse, the video evidence that the collapse starts and propagates downwards from the area of impact and the collapse does not start lower down, no radiation foot print, and people still alive in the remaining core have they shown any symptoms of poisoning?.
All that leads me to believe there were no nukes set off in the basement on 9/11.

What leads you to believe that they were? (I know I will regret asking that)

Woof!

 

[rat_patrol]

My memory concurs with Vetteman. The out come for you was quite bad. Funny though.

You mean apart from….there being no evidence that such a device as you describe existing, no seismic records of such a device being set off, no video or audio evidence of such a device being set off, the core or part of the core remaining standing after the collapse, the video evidence that the collapse stands and propagates downwards from the area of impact and the collapse does not start lower down, no radiation foot print, and people still alive in the remaining core have they shown any symptoms of poisoning?.
All that leads me to believe there were no nukes set off in the basement on 9/11.

What leads you to believe that they were? (I know I will regret asking that)

Woof!

Yes, the outcome of reducing someone to screaming "idiot" 50 times over the 'net was hilarious.

Evidence? Plenty of it. Everything from eyewitnesses to audio to video to seismic records.

Radiation footprint? Yes. Elavated levels of tritium were found.

Sickness? Ever heard of all the first responders coming down with strange ailments? Every search and rescue dog that was on "the pile" or "ground zero" is now gone.

Nukes "in basement"? I suspect probably several devices were used per building.

I suspect there were devices used ("nukes" in the loosest sense of trying to describe the new generation demo. devices), based on everything I just said.

 

[Bad_Doggie]

Yes, the outcome of reducing someone to screaming "idiot" 50 times over the 'net was hilarious. .

We were all laughing WITH Pookie, sorry.

Evidence? Plenty of it. Everything from eyewitnesses to audio to video to seismic records. .

None of nukes, sorry, unless you have seen something I haven’t. Nor the rest of the “truth moment” either. Your made up scenario is even too wacky for them to go with (apart from Judy Woo Woo) Are they part of the plot too? If you have some eyewitness who say that there were nukes, video or seismic data I would like to have a look. Make it something better than nonsense you-tube video will ya.

Sickness? Ever heard of all the first responders coming down with strange ailments? Every search and rescue dog that was on "the pile" or "ground zero" is now gone. .

As ever Turd you cannot stick to the point we are discussing. I asked you if any of the magic people who managed to survive the blast from a nuclear device been diagnosed with a form of radiation sickness.

I suspect there were devices used ("nukes" in the loosest sense of trying to describe the new generation demo. devices), based on everything I just said.

Do you have any evidence that they exist at all? Or is it all just a suspicion?

 

[rat_patrol]

We were all laughing WITH Pookie, sorry.

None of nukes, sorry, unless you have seen something I haven’t. Nor the rest of the “truth moment” either. Your made up scenario is even too wacky for them to go with (apart from Judy Woo Woo) Are they part of the plot too? If you have some eyewitness who say that there were nukes, video or seismic data I would like to have a look. Make it something better than nonsense you-tube video will ya.

As ever Turd you cannot stick to the point we are discussing. I asked you if any of the magic people who managed to survive the blast from a nuclear device been diagnosed with a form of radiation sickness.

Do you have any evidence that they exist at all? Or is it all just a suspicion?

Why do you keep saying "nukes"? I said "devices". I have no idea what type they were, except they can turn concrete into powder and steel into liquid.

Please link me to some evidence that jet fuel can melt metal and turn reinforced concrete into fine powder.

As for radiation sickness, here you go:

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/09/345825.shtml

 

[Bad_Doggie]

So you don’t have any evidence of the things you just posted past 1 off the wall 9/11 conspiracy site.

Why do you keep saying "nukes"? I said "devices". I have no idea what type they were.

Turd over the past 18 months of so you have said Nukes, Nukes, Nukes, Nukes. Hell I remember there are even a few threads dedicated to it. Must I go find them where you have argued for pages that it was backpack NUKES.

except they can turn concrete into powder and steel into liquid.

This is yet another example you being unable to understand how something might happen and so that leads you to concoct an incredible and completely un-supported scenario to explain it to yourself. Are there any other possibilities that could “concrete into powder and steel into liquid”?

We of course have not yet established whether or not there was any liquefied steel? Was there? Or is it yet another of the conspiracy theorists un-supported claims? Bet it is unless you can prove otherwise. Can ya?

Please link me to some evidence that jet fuel can melt metal and turn reinforced concrete into fine powder.

Luckily for me I never claimed that it could so I don’t see any reason why I should. Which metal are you referring to? Obviously, jet fuel temperature could melt some light metals such as copper, lead, some aluminium’s but so what.

Woof!

 

[Lancecastor]

If 512 architects are willing to come forward and say the 911 Commission Report was fishy, I say it's fishy.

 

[rat_patrol]

So you don’t have any evidence of the things you just posted past 1 off the wall 9/11 conspiracy site.


Turd over the past 18 months of so you have said Nukes, Nukes, Nukes, Nukes. Hell I remember there are even a few threads dedicated to it. Must I go find them where you have argued for pages that it was backpack NUKES.

This is yet another example you being unable to understand how something might happen and so that leads you to concoct and incredible and completely un-supported scenario to explain it to yourself. Are there any other possibilities that could “concrete into powder and steel into liquid”?

We of course not yet established whether or not there was any liquefied steel? Was there? Or is it yet another of the conspiracy theorists un-supported claims? Bet it is unless you can prove otherwise. Can ya?


Luckily for me I never claimed that it could so I don’t see any reason why I should. Which metal are you referring to? Obviously, jet fuel temperature could melt some light metals such as copper, lead, some aluminium’s but so what.

Woof!

Sorry, but everything I've seen leads me to believe there were devices in those buildings. Hell, they even warned emergency people to get the hell out before they "pulled" building 7.

Yes, it is just my opinion. Too many "coincidences". Can some coincidences happen? Yes. Weird things do sometimes happen.

But everything about that day was "strange".

I'm still sticking with my theory that a foreign enemy had us pegged. They KNEW we were doing anti-terror air drills that day. They knew about the WTC complex power down in advance. They knew how to disable the airliner transponders, and they hacked into the "home run" system. (If such a system exists, which seems to be the case).

Basically, the USA got completely sucker-punched, and the government has been trying to do damage control and cover up their own failings.

Which is a mistake , I think, because it fuels all the "government did it!" and "inside job" theories.

Can the mega BILLION dollar intel. community in the US be defeated? It was on 9/11. Totally and completely. The Chinese have even hacked SecDef Gate's Pentagon PC recently. NASA has been hacked. The World Bank. DoD. White House. Etc. All hacked and compromised.

The terrorists tried to bomb the WTC in 1993. So I don't see why it is so unreasonable to assume they tried again in 2001 and were successful.

http://www.willthomasonline.net/willthomasonline/Faulty_Chips.html

 

[Pookie]

Yes Turd, it's time to be a shiver looking for a backbone to run up. Make sure you thank Lance for the encore opportunity. The only good thing about this is it may bring Pookie out of her extended retirement.

Nope. It won't.


Opps.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Pookie]

Pookie! She cums out on my bday!

I was at the Pig earlier today ... and had a craving for b-day cake ... while standing in the meat section. Coincidence? I think not.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Pookie]

LOL.

It's an old mind trick I use, only after the proper amount of rum has been applied.

512 professionals should be looking into that, I say. *nods*

 

[FunLovingJerk]

Even leaving aside the suspicious behaviour of the key players on and around 9-11 and the history of US government criminality, the forensic evidence (physics, chemical, medical and photographic) is overwhelming. Then throw in eyewitness testimony, and suspicion becomes certainty.

911 was an inside job, and only brainwashed fools would believe otherwise.

 

[phrodeau]

Even leaving aside the suspicious behaviour of the key players on and around 9-11 and the history of US government criminality, the forensic evidence (physics, chemical, medical and photographic) is overwhelming. Then throw in eyewitness testimony, and suspicion becomes certainty.

911 was an inside job, and only brainwashed fools would believe otherwise.

Obviously, the terrorists crashed the planes into the buildings so that they could get through security and plant the bombs on the lower floors while the building was being evacuated.

 

[FunLovingJerk]

Obviously, the terrorists crashed the planes into the buildings so that they could get through security and plant the bombs on the lower floors while the building was being evacuated.

No, there's no evidence of any arabs being on those planes, and obviously Larry Silverstein's buildings were prepared for controlled demolitions weeks before 911.

I'm amazed that you can be stupid enough to not recognize controlled demolitions when you see them, but it takes all sorts of idiots just like you to keep defending the lies of the US govt.

 

[FunLovingJerk]

Sorry Turd, it doesn't fly.

The only thing that doesn't "fly" are the crazy lies that vetteman and pookie et al keep using.

Do you crazies rrrrreally believe the shit you defend? I doubt it. It's an act.

 

[FunLovingJerk]

Yes, the 512 professionals have asked that the 9/11 investigation be re-opened because of evidence which was not included in the government investigation...evidence that points to different conclusions.

I emphasize professionals because when you belong to a self-governing professional career-regulating body like engineers, architects, lawyers and doctors do...you don't question things like 9/11 as a prank or hoax or to start an unsubstantiated rumour...because to do so would risk your license to practise your career.

As one of if not the the pivotal events of out time, people everywhere have questions about the events that remain up in the air.

And unlike the Kennedy assassination, 9/11 has lots and lots of documented and physical evidence to sift through.

9/11 is therefore an excellent topic for a GB discussion, particularly if people take the time to have a close look at the two sites I have provided links for...one on each side of the argument...and do some reading of their own.

For those who say they'd like the GB to have more substance in its discussions and less grade-school nonsense, this is an excellent topic to dig into and explore as a group.

526 professional architects and engineers now.

911 Truth continues to win and grow.

On the US govt's side there is only the same handful of govt paid for liars, with the official story dying with their credibility.