Todd-'o'-Vision
Super xVirgin Man
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2002
- Posts
- 5,609
feminism - it used to be such an easy topic of conversation
I loved and supported what it began as and what I remember of it as I grew up but in the last 5-10 years maybe femenism has shattered into what I can see is at least three forms all of which calls itself under the feminist banner thought would be far from recognizing each other as feminist.
I begin with the center feminism or what has remained true in my opinion to the original tenats of feminism, and I think MizzX said it best so I will just quote her:
This is the route of feminism that I believe is right, and great and fully supportive by me, and being a christian I find it fully in accord with scripture.
The second I call, after the Limbaugh catch phrase Feminazi. This group while under the guise of feminism actually goes out of its way to put men down and raise women up and above in an air of superiority whether they earned, worked for or deserved it of thier own accord.
This group likes to find political backing be it left or right wing, either way it will be extreme of that direction, with a people or person who is in power that can push thier ideas and laws through the system.
they general get laws inacted as, for a lack of a better name in my head, "Feminism quotas".
A feminism quota is simple X number of employess or representatives have to be femamles. this is good and it is also bad.
On the Good side it allows females who are actually trying to improve themselves to get in positions or placement where they can do just that.
On the Bad side it is too often abused by the feminazi by getting women in position and placement regardless of qualification or education or training. That is to say a nuculear technician job is available two people, but three apply one man who is a nuclear physist, he gets the first position, the other two, one a man who is fresh out of nuclear university, and a woman fresh out of her beauty salon with only high school education. The feminazi would push the woman get the second position regardless the fact she has no qualifactions, where as the guy out of university has more qualifications for the second position.
Yes, I was being extreme in the example, but it is what the feminazi does, where as the center feminist, first example, wanted the job she would work for it, go to ubuniversity like the guy did get the qualifications so that when it was between her and a guy of same university training, it would come down to who was more qualified, be it the woman with slightly higher marks that the guy or more applied herself through classes.
Does all that make sense? ok, kool, if not ask questions.
the third, and by far the smallest, quietest and most detrimental to femisnist movement, the pseudo religious feminist this group insists that females should so utterly debase them selves that they are virtually slaves to everyone around them.
This group is a small generally insignificant, more of a harm to a very small core group of themselves than any great number of society. Formed by an ultrarightwinger male pseudobaptist preachers, who wanted females to basically be slaves, twisting every submission and headship passage in the Bible, I believe he even greater a few by select reading and omission.
Because of this trend of the tri-division in feminism, when a woman says she is a feminist, I generally just step back and wait to see the card game she deals out before, I even broach the subject.
I bet I fucked all your heads up with my useless opinion and thoughts
Todd
I loved and supported what it began as and what I remember of it as I grew up but in the last 5-10 years maybe femenism has shattered into what I can see is at least three forms all of which calls itself under the feminist banner thought would be far from recognizing each other as feminist.
I begin with the center feminism or what has remained true in my opinion to the original tenats of feminism, and I think MizzX said it best so I will just quote her:
This is the route of feminism that I believe is right, and great and fully supportive by me, and being a christian I find it fully in accord with scripture.
The second I call, after the Limbaugh catch phrase Feminazi. This group while under the guise of feminism actually goes out of its way to put men down and raise women up and above in an air of superiority whether they earned, worked for or deserved it of thier own accord.
This group likes to find political backing be it left or right wing, either way it will be extreme of that direction, with a people or person who is in power that can push thier ideas and laws through the system.
they general get laws inacted as, for a lack of a better name in my head, "Feminism quotas".
A feminism quota is simple X number of employess or representatives have to be femamles. this is good and it is also bad.
On the Good side it allows females who are actually trying to improve themselves to get in positions or placement where they can do just that.
On the Bad side it is too often abused by the feminazi by getting women in position and placement regardless of qualification or education or training. That is to say a nuculear technician job is available two people, but three apply one man who is a nuclear physist, he gets the first position, the other two, one a man who is fresh out of nuclear university, and a woman fresh out of her beauty salon with only high school education. The feminazi would push the woman get the second position regardless the fact she has no qualifactions, where as the guy out of university has more qualifications for the second position.
Yes, I was being extreme in the example, but it is what the feminazi does, where as the center feminist, first example, wanted the job she would work for it, go to ubuniversity like the guy did get the qualifications so that when it was between her and a guy of same university training, it would come down to who was more qualified, be it the woman with slightly higher marks that the guy or more applied herself through classes.
Does all that make sense? ok, kool, if not ask questions.
the third, and by far the smallest, quietest and most detrimental to femisnist movement, the pseudo religious feminist this group insists that females should so utterly debase them selves that they are virtually slaves to everyone around them.
This group is a small generally insignificant, more of a harm to a very small core group of themselves than any great number of society. Formed by an ultrarightwinger male pseudobaptist preachers, who wanted females to basically be slaves, twisting every submission and headship passage in the Bible, I believe he even greater a few by select reading and omission.
Because of this trend of the tri-division in feminism, when a woman says she is a feminist, I generally just step back and wait to see the card game she deals out before, I even broach the subject.
I bet I fucked all your heads up with my useless opinion and thoughts
Todd
