.

[Marcax]

.

 

[briancamdudetenger2018]

xxx style ai are always nuts

 

[LoneMilf]

spicychat.ai works well for roleplay/sexting-like experiences. It wouldn't be any good for longer or deeper stories though

 

[Nicefella]

spicychat.ai works well for roleplay/sexting-like experiences. It wouldn't be any good for longer or deeper stories though

Doesn’t it sort of defeat the purpose/ knowing that a living breathing human is not communicating with you.

 

[SmokingFap]

Doesn’t it sort of defeat the purpose/ knowing that a living breathing human is not communicating with you.

I don't think so. Sometimes you can flesh fantasies out with an AI that you aren't comfortable talking to a human about. Even on Lit.

 

[SmokingFap]

I have plenty of ideas for stories but don’t have the skill and/or patience and/or time to bring them to fruition. Using ai to expand on them has been fun to some extent but somehow I feel emptier afterwards, and I don’t mean my balls. Has anyone found a good one for nsfw? I’ve used perchance.

I like perchance. A new scenario for an hour or so.

 

[LoneMilf]

Doesn’t it sort of defeat the purpose/ knowing that a living breathing human is not communicating with you.

To me, it's two different experiences.

With another human being, I may get a lot more creativity, actual empathy and much more coherence. But it's difficult to find a good match and even when you do, it's really slow.

With an AI-chatbot, I get instant responses with relevant and hot content. It's also easy to tailor it to my specific desires. But it's more predictable and doesn't hold up well in prolonged sessions.

Kind of like fastfood and a Michelin star meal. Sure, one is clearly better than the other, but I can enjoy both and one has a significantly higher cost than the other

 

[DeepSleeper]

Neural chemical receptors and inhibitors are not adequately stimulated by AI to succinctly satisfy human carnality, except in those humans that have never experienced actual human contact previously. Its one of the current benchmark identifiers of Turing test pass sufficiency.
Companies are actually contemplating the fact that it may indeed be easier to behaviourally reengineer humans to AI than it maybe to engineer LLM based AI’s to overcome these hurdles and capitalise on the Business model enough to actually make money.

 

[Russian_Beauty]

Doesn’t it sort of defeat the purpose/ knowing that a living breathing human is not communicating with you.

I fully agree with you when it comes to my own feelings.

However, speaking from my Literotica experience, men here can roughly be divided 30 / 70: for 30%, it is indeed meaningful to communicate with a human person, while 70% only want clichéd answers that an AI would have given much easier than a human girl.

My sample is representative enough. In total, I estimate to have been contacted by over 1,000 men in my five-and-a-half months on Literotica).

 

[DeepSleeper]

I fully agree with you when it comes to my own feelings.

However, speaking from my Literotica experience, men here can roughly be divided 30 / 70: for 30%, it is indeed meaningful to communicate with a human person, while 70% only want clichéd answers that an AI would have given much easier than a human girl.

My sample is representative enough. In total, I estimate to have been contacted by over 1,000 men in my five-and-a-half months on Literotica).

HoleeFuck!
Your milkshake does indeed bring all the chaps to the yard.
Statistically your inbox must be exhausted!
Of that 1000men, what percentage(Guesstimation) initiated contact with a Cockshot/Dickpic?

 

[Russian_Beauty]

HoleeFuck!
Your milkshake does indeed bring all the chaps to the yard.
Statistically your inbox must be exhausted!
Of that 1000men, what percentage(Guesstimation) initiated contact with a Cockshot/Dickpic

Well, 1,000+ is Literotica forum + Literotica chat.

On forum, I got messages from no more than 60-70 men.

On chat, many more. At first, dickheads with dickpics were around 10%. Not that many but more than enough for me. But after I mocked them in my bio, the number dropped to almost zero. Literotica people do read bios.

 

[DeepSleeper]

Well, 1,000+ is Literotica forum + Literotica chat.

On forum, I got messages from no more than 60-70 men.

On chat, many more. At first, dickheads with dickpics were around 10%. Not that many but more than enough for me. But after I mocked them in my bio, the number dropped to almost zero. Literotica people do read bios.

Wow,
Tip of the hat to you for handling that much ‘rope’ in the inbox.
I appreciate the statistical info.

 

[SmokingFap]

Neural chemical receptors and inhibitors are not adequately stimulated by AI to succinctly satisfy human carnality, except in those humans that have never experienced actual human contact previously. Its one of the current benchmark identifiers of Turing test pass sufficiency.
Companies are actually contemplating the fact that it may indeed be easier to behaviourally reengineer humans to AI than it maybe to engineer LLM based AI’s to overcome these hurdles and capitalise on the Business model enough to actually make money.

A lot of fancy words in there, but I would disagree. The perchance AI that I use once in awhile is very stimulating and satisfying in its responses.