Uncut technical info requested

SlickTony

Literotica Guru
Joined
May 25, 2002
Posts
6,344
In the latest story I'm working on, my protagonist gets involved with a guy who's uncut. Problem is, I haven't had that much contact with uncut cocks myself, probably as a result of being American and over half the guys I've been with were Moslems. I suppose it would be easier to just have the character be snipped, but when I develop a character, I tend to take his background and all into account and wait for facts about him/her to "drop in" (thanks, Carole King) to my mind, and, well, it seems natural for this character to still be as God made him.

I've been in the Yummy Uncut Cocks thread in the amateur pics feedback forum, but still pictures don't tell you everything, and there seems to be an astounding range of differences in what happens with the foreskin during stages of arousal. Does it recede of itself or is it pulled back? Does it sometimes just stay in place? Does it vary from owner to owner?

I thought of posting my question in the uncut forum itself, but it's a different crowd out there, and the forum is so big; I thought I'd ask among the people I know better first...
 
I'm no expert, however,

It gets pulled back during sex, or when he gets a hardon. Some men may have enough skin so that it doesn't uncover the head with a hardon, but during penetration, it gets pushed back, for sure.
You could have her licking it, and pulling back the skin to uncover his purple head, or something like that.
Just make sure it is clean! Even in a story!
 
How long is a piece of string?

I can be erect and still hooded, for want of a better word. What happens next is really down to the woman. I can draw it back or I go for it there an then. To be honest, Unless she is dripping, or has just given me a BJ I'd rather go drawn, its a friction thing.

The worst description I've heard so far is that "sometimes he tastes of soap, at least I know hes clean"

If you have specific questions, go for it, I will do my utmost to answer (as will, I am sure, the rest of lit).
 
My SO is uncut, he is the first man I ever had that was. When we first had sex I saw him and he don't have a lot of forskin but what he does have it does pull back when we have sex. When he is hard I can't see the forskin cover his head so giving him a blow job is gr8 the skin not in the way at all. Don't know how much more you need.
 
Thanks, y'all! Between your info and Gauchecritic's, I think I have enough info to go on. The protagonist in my current story isn't a woman, but that doesn't signify. It's a little bit odd that he's going to have had more experience in handling an unsnipped cock than I'll have had, but that's the way it goes.

If you want to see a lively discussion, generate a cut vs. uncut argument, especially when it comes to making the decision for our sons. We had my son done, because it seemed the thing to do, but the doctor who did it took as little as the law would allow, and all through toddlerhood, my son suffered with adhesions from all that leftover skin. If I had it to do over again, I might have had him left alone; OTOH, who'd have been in a position to tell him how to maintain the area? Certainly not his dad, who, like many Americans, is cut. However, I don't think he has any problem now. I haven't seen his equipment in many years; he's reached that modest age. I guess he'd tell his dad if there was anything wrong.

I read somewhere that circumcision reduces sensitivity in the glans to a great degree, which is said to account for American men's (and more erudite Moslem men's) great love of blowjobs. What's your take on that?
 
uncut

i am uncut, and a new person on here. i am glad my parents didnt clip me. when i p lay with my cock it is so enjoyable to pull the foreskin back and forth , when i am really hard it is hard to cover my head but it is also verry enjoyable at the sametime.when i am soft i am only about 2 inchs. but when i get hard i get abiut 6 inches and about 2 and a half inchs around . i hope that helps youy this is a great site you learn so much from other people thanks :p
 
Mrs. 420 had never been with an uncut guy before me. Now ever time she looks at a cut dick, all she can see is the circumcision scar.

As far as keeping the unit clean, I just remember somewhere around the age of 12 I just pulled the rainsleeve back and gave it some warm water and soap. Kinda like keeping the belly button clean. :D
 
I'm uncut and I've actually been wondering about getting it cut off now. It may be a little too late - I'm 29 - but in my opinion, it really just gets in the way of masturbating the way I like - focusing on the head. And I don't even have that much skin - when erect, it exposes at least half of the head and (mostly) stays off of it once pulled back.

Anyone ever heard of adult circumcision?
 
Well I imagine it's done with proper anaesthesia and other precautions taken! I guess the big question is, what happens if you get a hard-on before it's fully healed (takes 4 weeks from what I hear)? Although from past experience I can say that if getting a hard-on is painful for some reason or another, it really won't happen. Your dick is smarter than you thought!
 
In some cultures that call for circumcision, it is done at puberty. I seem to recall reading that Ishmael was done at this time, instead of the customary 8 days which became the norm in Judaic culture. I think that everybody who hadn't been circumcized became circumcized before the battle of--was it Jericho, where supposedly the sun stood still all day so they'd have time to fight? I have always held that no such screwing around with the laws of nature and physics needed to have taken place--if they had just undergone this operation and then had to go and fight, the day would have seemed awfully damn long anyway.
 
Well to be honest I'm uncut and proud. I have never had any problems with erections or any thing else sexually involved. I personally couldn't imagine going under the knife or putting my future kids under the knife either. People say that female circumcision is brutal and immoral and I feel the same way about male circumcision. Besides if the powers that be wanted a man to be with out foreskin a surgery wouldn't be needed.

The Fool is out.
 
Pain

sobesundevil said:
Well I imagine it's done with proper anaesthesia and other precautions taken! I guess the big question is, what happens if you get a hard-on before it's fully healed (takes 4 weeks from what I hear)? Although from past experience I can say that if getting a hard-on is painful for some reason or another, it really won't happen. Your dick is smarter than you thought!
I had a circumcision when I was 21, due to the pain from hardons.
(My skin was so tight, it constricted my penis behind the head when I got hard, which hurt.)
Your dick may be smart but your brain is not. They give you things to help with hardons during the day, but the problem is at night. When I slept, I got a hardon, almost every night, which made the stitches cut into my skin, and I have everlasting scars from it. Not a major thing now, but it was then.

However, when I recovered, I had many years of pleasurable sex, so it was probably worth it.
So that's why I insisted on having my boys cut when they were babies - so they would never have to go through the pain.
 
People say that female circumcision is brutal and immoral and I feel the same way about male circumcision.

Well, I did say that if I had it to do over again, I'd have left my son like God made him. But it has to be emphasized that males and females are circumcized for vastly different reasons outside of religious ones: males, to supposedly reduce the risk of penile cancer (or cervical cancer in their mates); because there is a perception that women (who are used to seeing mostly cut men) think an uncut penis is unhygienic; and to look "regular" in the locker room--that, and because the foreskin is too tight, as Magic mentioned, and gave problems. The only reason women are circumcized is to reduce their enjoyment of sex. The fact that operation often left women in pain for the rest of their lives and made childbirth even more painful and risky than it already is was evidently not taken into consideration. And if you think that this only ever took place in "primitive" cultures, they did it to women sometimes in the 19th century, to "treat" the problem of excessive masturbation.
 
I would never put a son of mine under the knife. I don't have kids, but I know that I would leave any son intact.
As for the question, my head just peeks out when erect.
I think I am more sensitive in the head area than cut men. If I pull back the foreskin it is EXTREMELY sensitive! I could not imagine that rubbing against my clothing all day.
It's not hard to keep clean, just retract and wash. No brainer.
 
Another woman's opinion?

When my S/O is in a flaccid state, the foreskin covers the entire head of the penis. When he begins to become aroused, his penis will begin to get firm, but the head stays covered. Slowly, as he becomes more aroused, the tip of the head will peek out more and more from the foreskin. (This is actually my favorite part!) When he is fully erect, the head is still about half covered. When he enters me the foreskin is pushed back, exposing the head. I'm not sure if the foreskin rubs back and forth - he has told me he doesn't pay much attention, it just feels good. After he orgasms and comes out, the head is exposed. As the penis becomes flaccid again, the foreskin slowly covers the head once again.

When I give him a blowjob, he enjoys it when I play (lightly!) with the foreskin, but what really gets him off is when I use my lips to push the foreskin back totally, exposing the head. Don't know about the more or less intense feeling, but I never had a cut guy respond so strongly to having my tongue connect with the head of his penis as the man I'm with now does.

An uncut penis is truly a wonderment of nature.
 
SexyChele said:
Another woman's opinion?

When I give him a blowjob, he enjoys it when I play (lightly!) with the foreskin, but what really gets him off is when I use my lips to push the foreskin back totally, exposing the head. Don't know about the more or less intense feeling, but I never had a cut guy respond so strongly to having my tongue connect with the head of his penis as the man I'm with now does.

you're right about the sensitivity - a hand and some lube on my cockhead can drive me absolutely crazy, but for the same reason, i want that head exposed more, and the foreskin gets in the way a little bit. it's not a problem when i'm fully erect, but i like having my cock sucked and stroked when i'm half-erect, and that's when keeping the head fully exposed becomes tricky...
 
but what really gets him off is when I use my lips to push the foreskin back totally, exposing the head.

Thanks, Chele! That's one of the best bits of info I've received yet.
 
SexyChele said:
When I give him a blowjob, he enjoys it when I play (lightly!) with the foreskin, but what really gets him off is when I use my lips to push the foreskin back totally, exposing the head. Don't know about the more or less intense feeling, but I never had a cut guy respond so strongly to having my tongue connect with the head of his penis as the man I'm with now does.

An uncut penis is truly a wonderment of nature.

When I finally discovered the joy of an uncut man, I was astounded at how much more sensitive he was than any other lover had been. So sensitive, in fact, that I had to change quite a bit of my approach to lovemaking. What other lovers seemed to need for proper stimulation was far too intense for him.

So far as what happened...my response would be a lot like SexyChele's, with the exception of the foreskin being pushed back at entry...I know the friction once he was inside caused it to be pushed back, but I don't recall it retracting behind the head BEFORE entry.

But the sensitivity! Wow! What a rush. :D

S.
 
I'm not sure if the foreskin rubs back and forth - he has told me he doesn't pay much attention, it just feels good

It can do, a lot of it depends on how you are doing it. If I go shallow and slow, then I definitely have the added sensation of my foreskin added to the equation. "pornstar strokes" must admit, I dont really notice the old rain coat.

What other lovers seemed to need for proper stimulation was far too intense for him.

Wont argue with that, I would go as far as to substitute painful for intense.
 
Back
Top