Fat bitch hypo-creep, To Be or Not To Be (Unilateral), That’s Hillary’s Question

To Be or Not To Be (Unilateral), That’s Hillary’s Question


The joy of watching the Democrats in action comes from the fact that they are consistently inconsistent. They say one thing in an attempt to win favor with middle America, yet their actions show them to be as left-wing as ever. Now, Hillary Clinton is blasting President Bush for working with other nations in dealing with Iran. However, when it came to Iraq, Clinton and other Democrats criticized President Bush for allegedly “going it alone.”

Despite the fact that rangling between the U.N. and Iraq had been going on for more than a decade regarding Iraq’s compliance with U.N. sanctions, the Democrats hammered the president relentlessly for his supposed unilateral approach to Saddam Hussein’s regime. America and other nations saw Iraq 1) as a threat to export their weapons and weapons technology to groups such as al Qaeda and 2) in clear violation of U.N. Security Council resolutions.


The president worked with other nations to hold Iraq to account. The U.N. Security Council passed resolution 1441 demanding Iraq to account for all WMDs. Only after all negotiations failed did the U.S., along with a multi-national coalition, go into Iraq and remove Saddam Hussein from power. But for the Democrats, the U.S. (in the person of President Bush) was the lone wolf. We were going it alone and did not have the “national community” on our side.

Now, we fast forward to the present and the growing threat that Iran poses not only to the region but to the entire world. Iran is bent on developing nuclear weapons. Their hatred for America is well-known, but their immediate target is Israel. The president is working through the U.N. and the EU-3 (a negotiating coalition of France, Germany, and Great Britain) to see that Iran does not become a nuclear weapons power.

Yet, now the Democrats are complaining that President Bush in not engaged in the situation — that the U.S. should be forcing Iran to comply. In a speech this week at Princeton University, Hillary Clinton blasted the president on the situation in Iraq. According to the report Senate Democrat Will Introduce Resolution on Iran, Clinton said, “I believe that we lost critical time in dealing with Iran because the White House chose to downplay the threats and to outsource the negotiations.”

Outsource the negotiations? Question to Sen. Clinton, “Should we be bringing other nations to the table or not?”

The Democrats are now poised to put forward a resolution restricting certain dealings with Iran as part of their “get tough” strategy. However, the Democrats have proven over and over again that when it comes to national security and world affairs, it is they who are more apt to “outsource” leadership to the U.N. or nations like France.

Consistently inconsistent. I guess being unilateral is OK when it’s Hillary Clinton and the Democrats doing the talking.

So, who did you steal that from, Plagarism-Boy?

Im not J Biden


But I'll tell you anyway

But you gotta tell me

how the FATBITCH HIPPO-CREEP

can be so HIPPO-CREEP-ABLE?

busybody said:

Im not J Biden


But I'll tell you anyway

But you gotta tell me

how the FATBITCH HIPPO-CREEP

can be so HIPPO-CREEP-ABLE?

Click to expand...

She studied under Dick Cheney?

and he is Hippo-Creep-able

about what?

Seriously, she cant bitch one way about Iraq and the other way about Iran

it just shows her to what nothing but an OPPURTUNIST who will take a position without justification

can any poly-pish-in be trusted when they cange their views depending on the prevailing wind?

busybody said:

can any poly-pish-in be trusted when they cange their views depending on the prevailing wind?

Click to expand...

Really. I remember the day that when you bought a politician, he stayed bought.

and Cheney is Hippo-Creep-able

about what?

John McCain Crushes Hillary Clinton in New Poll (NewsMax, 1/20/06)


Sen. John McCain trounces Hillary Clinton in the latest poll on the 2008 presidential race, which gives him a whopping 16-point advantage over the former first lady.

By a margin of 52 to 36 percent, voters preferred the Arizona Republican over Clinton in the Diageo/Hotline survey.


Even Republicans aren't a stupid enough party to not nominate him, especially given how much help such a landslide will offer down ticket.

Senator Clinton accepts money from supporters of Iranian Mullahs


Yonkers, NY – Senator Clinton has accused President Bush of downplaying the threat from Iran while accepting money from supporters of the Iranian regime.

Wealthy businessmen Hassan Nemazee and Faraj Aalaei are associated with the American Iranian Council, a pro-regime anti-sanctions group. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Namazee has contributed $4,000 to Clinton's reelection while Aalaei has given $1,000.

The press describes their lobby this way "the American-Iranian Council [AIC], a pro-regime lobbying group trying to get Congress and the Bush administration to lift the trade embargo on Iran." (Insight, 3/25/04)

Hillary Clinton is also raising money from Gati Kashani, another figure linked with the Mullahs.

On its website, the Iranian American PAC noted, "On Friday June 3rd, Iranian American friends of the Hillary Clinton Senate re-election campaign hosted a fundraising event in honor of Senator Clinton. The event took place at the home of Gita and Behzad Kashani in Los Altos Hills, California."

The PAC favors looser Visa rule for Iranians coming to the United States. The FBI opposes liberalized visas for the terrorist state. But in full pander mode, the PAC reported Clinton attacked United States Visa policy. "Senator Clinton went on to address the audience on topics specifically relevant to the Iranian American community. She discussed immigration and acknowledged the difficulties Iranian nationals have in obtaining visas to visit family members residing in America. 'Our visa policy is not only unfair but it's not good for America.'"

John Spencer, the former Yonkers Mayor and Vietnam combat veteran who will challenge Senator Clinton in November, made the following statement. "Senator Clinton voted against the very munitions necessary to avoid a nuclear confrontation with Iran while at the same time accepting money from supporters of the Iranian Mullahs. Senator Clinton lacks the credibility to keep New York safe and she should return this tainted money

she is a FUCKING LYING SACK OF SHIT, BITCH HO!

Sen. Clinton Calls for Iran Sanctions

By GEOFF MULVIHILL, Associated Press Writer
Thu Jan 19, 10:50 AM ET

Sen. Hillary Clinton called for United Nations sanctions against Iran and faulted the Bush administration for "downplaying" the threat Tehran’s nuclear program poses.

In an address Wednesday evening at Princeton University, Clinton, D-N.Y., said it was a mistake for the U.S. to have Britain, France and Germany head up nuclear talks with Iran over the past 2 1/2 years. Last week, Iran resumed nuclear research in a move Tehran claims is for energy, not weapons.

"I believe that we lost critical time in dealing with Iran because the White House chose to downplay the threats and chose to outsource the negotiations," Clinton said.

Earlier this week, a meeting in London produced no agreement among the U.S., France, Britain, Germany, Russia and China on whether to refer the dispute over Iranian nuclear enrichment to the Security Council, which could impose sanctions.

Russia and China have joined Europe and the U.S. in criticizing Iran’s resumption of uranium enrichment. But both would prefer to avoid Security Council involvement and are outright opposed to sanctions, which are backed by the Bush administration.

While Clinton was critical of the administration, she never mentioned the president by name and did not engage in the same sort of sharp rhetorical attack against him or other Republicans as she did earlier this week.

Speaking Monday at a Martin Luther King Jr. memorial event in Harlem, Clinton said that the House of Representatives "has been run like a plantation" and called the Bush administration "one of the worst that has ever governed our country." The senator’s remarks spurred heated reaction from Republicans.

Clinton spoke Wednesday to some 800 Princeton students, staff and alumni at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs.

It seems like only yesterday Ms. Rodham and her sometimes husband, Bill, were issuing similar threats against Iraq:

We must exercise responsibility not just at home, but around the world. On the eve of a new century, we have the power and the duty to build a new era of peace and security. We must combat an unholy axis of new threats from terrorists, international criminals, and drug traffickers. These 21st century predators feed on technology and the free flow of information… And they will be all the more lethal if weapons of mass destruction fall into their hands. Together, we must confront the new hazards of chemical and biological weapons and the outlaw states, terrorists, and organized criminals seeking to acquire them. Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade and much of his nation’s wealth not on providing for the Iraqi people but on developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. - President Clinton, Jan 27, 1998

One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line. - President Bill Clinton, Feb 4, 1998

In the next century, the community of nations may see more and more the very kind of threat Iraq poses now - a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction ready to use them or provide them to terrorists, drug traffickers or organized criminals who travel the world among us unnoticed. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow by the knowledge that they can act with impunity, even in the face of a clear message from the United Nations Security Council and clear evidence of a weapons of mass destruction program. If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program. His regime threatens the safety of his people, the stability of his region, and the security of all the rest of us. What if he fails to comply, and we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route which gives him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass destruction and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made? Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee you, he’ll use the arsenal. - President Bill Clinton, Feb 17, 1998

Heavy as they are, the costs of action must be weighed against the price of inaction. If Saddam defies the world and we fail to respond, we will face a far greater threat in the future. Saddam will strike again at his neighbors; he will make war on his own people. And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them. - President Bill Clinton, Dec 16, 1998
Every nation has to either be with us, or against us. Those who harbor terrorists, or who finance them, are going to pay a price. - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY) Sep 13, 2001

In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members… It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

And we all know how well they have stood behind those words.

i THOUGHT THIS WAS GONNA BE A DOLL PARTS THREAD.

NIP


Fuck off

Thank you!

Hey Pvt Matt

the first post is in Yiddish

for YOU!