LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

'Unlikely to have been engineered'

Once more SFB's posts a paper that essentially proves nothing.

First of all no one I know in the scientific community has ever stated with positivity that the Wuhan Flu was genetically engineered. I've only seen two papers that have strongly suggested that, one out of Canada and the other from France.

We do know that that lab was engaged in 'gain of function' research. A fancy way of saying 'accelerated evolution.' It should also be noted that this can also occur as a result of sloppy lab work. Regardless, to this day, no natural source of the virus has been found. This does NOT rule out the fact that one may be found.............eventually. But until such time, the lab itself is still the prime suspect.

What the report does say, with a high degree of certainty, that the virus was not man made. But at the same time the report does NOT say with 100% certainty that that is a fact.

Personally I don't think it was genetically engineered, nor do I believe that it was purposely unleashed.

What I DO believe is that that that lab is the source of the outbreak. That this occurred as a result of a poorly designed lab and/or sloppy lab procedure. Neither one of those beliefs have been addressed in the public portion of that report.

And that brings me to my key question, "On a matter of such importance to the world, why is ANY portion of that report deemed to be 'classified?'" What is being hidden?
 
I have to agree with most of that last post.

It's well thought out compared to what preceded it.

That lab has been cited, with concern, in the past for its sloppiness.
 
That's why the CCP has threatened any and everyone who wants to get to the bottom of the virus's origins....because it came from the we market.
 
The vaccines were also genetically modified and produced in laboratories. Oh, horrors!
 
bellisarius said:
Once more SFB's posts a paper that essentially proves nothing.

First of all no one I know in the scientific community has ever stated with positivity that the Wuhan Flu was genetically engineered. I've only seen two papers that have strongly suggested that, one out of Canada and the other from France.

We do know that that lab was engaged in 'gain of function' research. A fancy way of saying 'accelerated evolution.' It should also be noted that this can also occur as a result of sloppy lab work. Regardless, to this day, no natural source of the virus has been found. This does NOT rule out the fact that one may be found.............eventually. But until such time, the lab itself is still the prime suspect.

What the report does say, with a high degree of certainty, that the virus was not man made. But at the same time the report does NOT say with 100% certainty that that is a fact.

Personally I don't think it was genetically engineered, nor do I believe that it was purposely unleashed.

What I DO believe is that that that lab is the source of the outbreak. That this occurred as a result of a poorly designed lab and/or sloppy lab procedure. Neither one of those beliefs have been addressed in the public portion of that report.

And that brings me to my key question, "On a matter of such importance to the world, why is ANY portion of that report deemed to be 'classified?'" What is being hidden?
Click to expand...

I can agree with the above, but will note that gain of function research is the act of genetically enhancing a natural virus. The lab is associated with the Chinese military, and a vaccine against it was being researched simultaneously at the same lab. So at some point somebody knew this virus would be unreleased.
 
Philthy_Phil said:
Gain of function is the new trumptard dog whistle.
Click to expand...

In the context of the release of SARS-Cov2, gain of function certainly raises red flags. I am convinced of nefarious intent. I don't think you can look at the totality of the effects of the attack and conclude otherwise. There is clearly a multi-national conspiracy, assigning the appellation "Deep State" is fine.
 
Ramone45 said:
In the context of the release of SARS-Cov2, gain of function certainly raises red flags. I am convinced of nefarious intent. I don't think you can look at the totality of the effects of the attack and conclude otherwise. There is clearly a multi-national conspiracy, assigning the appellation "Deep State" is fine.
Click to expand...

Man who confirms post they are quoting reaffirms their point in response.
 
Rightguide said:
I can agree with the above, but will note that gain of function research is the act of genetically enhancing a natural virus. The lab is associated with the Chinese military, and a vaccine against it was being researched simultaneously at the same lab. So at some point somebody knew this virus would be unreleased.
Click to expand...
China is communist. Everything is associated with their military.
 
jaF0 said:
US COVID origins report: researchers pleased with scientific approach

Nature|5 hours ago

Intelligence investigation is inconclusive on virus's origins, but finds SARS-CoV-2 wasn't weaponized and unlikely to have been engineered.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02366-0
Click to expand...

It’s an opinion piece posted in “Nature” magazine and we’re all supposed to swallow it as fact, huh? SMH….
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Therapy to change 'feminine' boy created a troubled man, family says
2 3
Replies
57
Views
3K
Wolfman1982
W
Byron In Exile
Before you lemmings line up for your flu shots...
4 5 6
Replies
133
Views
5K
Ulaven_Demorte
Ulaven_Demorte
Mike_Yates
The Interdimensional Hypothesis
Replies
0
Views
228
Mike_Yates
Mike_Yates
S
Flirting 101...
Replies
12
Views
1K
greeneyed_Lady
greeneyed_Lady
fgarvb1
Separation Of Powers Between President And Congress
Replies
7
Views
983
Gunner70
Gunner70
Back
Top