Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
dodgedartslant6 said:Good but depressing.
Wow. This is almost identical to a posting just a few spaces up by 4glory6. Identical wording making the same argument. You would almost think there was a connection.usana said:Yes, I nominated the "Tuscan Twilight" series as a whole for the Genre Transcending category and hope voters will consider it as a whole--five integrated stories spanning the primary sexual preferences, with one author given four "E"s for his rendering (separately) of straight, gay male, lesbian, and group. Haven't seen anything more genre transcending on Lit. than that (or anything honored as such here by the Lit. editors' pure assessment of a story on its content merits and all club block voting based purely on author friendships aside). If you don't vote these stories, I at least highly recommend them to you as a read of an accomplished author given to lush detail and exotic locales and, in this series, transcending genres. Has any other Lit. author received Es in all three categories (straight, GM, and Lesbian)? If so, please point them out. I'd like to read that author's work too.
sr71plt said:No harm taken, FF--and I can understand your concern. I, possibly like you, would prefer some line of contests here in which the stories were judged in the blind (author's name not identified during the judging) by a panel of trained writers. Concentrating on the content and delivery of the story and quality of writing rather than giving way to who is in what voting clique (or who has the access to the most computers with different ISPs) would enhance the literary reputation of the site, certainly. But this is what is offered--and the editors at Lit. are quite generous to be offering and maintaining any contests at all. If submitting to the contests means a few more readers will actually read my stories, it doesn't matter that much that the voting blocks (evidenced here by some stories going hot as they are posted) fully control who will actually win (or even register a good showing). I write in categories where few seem to vote anyway. Just happy to maximize the readers. More read my stories here in two days than buy one of my main stream published books in six months. I don't need the cash associated with these contests. I was flabbergasted to have been nominated for this contest at all.
drksideofthemoon said:I just decline the contests all together...they are really quite meaningless, they pretty much boil down to a popularity contest....
sr71plt said:You mean . . . you mean . . . that it isn't the most talented performer who wins on "American Idol"? Well, g-o-l-l-y.
(Scurrying off to read DarkSides's stories--which I understand are really very good.)
scouries said:C’MON, VOTE for somebody!
RogueLurker said:The rest comes across as whining and reminds me of the negative advertising that comes out at election time.
RogueLurker said:About the only thing that I found worthwhile in the post above was:
The rest comes across as whining and reminds me of the negative advertising that comes out at election time.
What people perceive as "sexy" is subjective. These are the stories which were nominated and all have votes, so they must have done something for at least a few people.
Vote for Scouries if you think Stephanie is sexy.
Vote for Sweetwitch, Varian P, Fusionnee or SelenaKittyn if you think Carissa, Devan, Jovanna, or Tara were sexy.
Just vote - read the nominated stories and vote.
Best of luck to everyone - and yes, JRS, that includes you.
Psst: You do know that your assessments have probably lost you the middle aged women and gay votes?
scouries said:Don’t take my word on who to vote for.
JRS
thanks ftfFallingToFly said:TY Rogue, for that wonderful post.
Scouries, you don't do yourself any favors with posts like that, you know. This is probably the third or fourth self-congratulatory drivel I've read from you, and far from being impressed, I have deliberately and intentionally avoided reading anything of yours.
No one likes a whining, mewling bad sport, for future reference.
(And trashing Fusionee's work probably just got you notonly last place, but there's probably a phone call being made somewhere to a guy named Tony from Brooklyn. You have no idea how beloved those two authors are.)
femininity said:thanks ftf![]()
![]()
![]()
and its not tony from brooklyn. it's jessi from edinburgh![]()
scouries - - - wtf is your problem man? you dont trash other peoples stories because u wanna look good. if u had something valid to say about the stories then cool but dont make up shit to make your average fucked up story seem better than whats out there.
honestly man. yours is about a dad fucking his 18 year old. whats sexy about that?
get a life.
RedHairedandFriendly said:I don't agree completely with this.
I was a new writer in 2005 and went up against some very well read, and well known writers in two categories and won both. I don't think I won because of popularity. Like I said, I was not known like those I shared company with.
This year, I am nominated for my poetry. Again, I don't feel I am losing because I am not as well known as a poet as the others. My poem, just isn't the favored. My score for one isn't bad at all, second I believe with only needed a couple more votes to tie with first, and this is in the early days of voting...One category, I'm going to be watching the dust curl behind the winner, but not because he's more popular than me. In my opinion folks liked his poem more than mine.
I'm sure there are people that don't read all the stories and just vote for the author they like more, or the poster they like more. But I am not going to see that my wins from 2005 were mine because I was popular. I believe I won because folks liked my story more than another, something that shocked me and made me feel very thrilled.