The NNPT.

Matthew Craig said:
Ahahahahahahahahaa, nobody gives a fuck you smug, self righteous buffoon.
No, Matty. You just can't read.
 
Matthew Craig said:
That still doesn't change your buffoonary.
But it makes my buffoonery legit. I don't post lies. I can back what I say.
 
Siddhartha said:
I don't even begin to comprehend what's going on here.

I think maybe NNPT stands for "not now posting trivia" ??

Otherwise just an unfortunate personal encounter.
 
ecclectic said:
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty?


*Smacks self in the face* Jesus Christ, I've been in the rank and file too long. I should have known that.

He's talking about our government's recent deal with India over the increased production of nuclear fuel, in complete violation of said treaty.

Our government wants to beat the drums of war over Iran, in spite of our current mess here in Iraq, and yet we give India a free pass. "Oh, it's cool, he's with us."

Parting shot by the outgoing Rethuglican Congress.
 
If anyone thinks Iran doesn't have ICBM tipped Nukes you are naive.

Just because they dont have to test them doesn't mean they dont have them.
 
Killswitch said:
If anyone thinks Iran doesn't have ICBM tipped Nukes you are naive.

Just because they dont have to test them doesn't mean they dont have them.

True. In fact testing them would be a very dangerous idea.
 
SeanH said:
Ahashhhahhahahhahahahhahaahaahahah!

I'm puzzled...nukes were so terribly bad for children and other living things way back when, but you parlor pinks have been positively insouciant about them since fellow leftist Kim Jong Il and Bush-hater Amadasahatter started getting them. Are they bad things again now that someone friendly to Chimpy is mentioned?

And, if you think about it, the NNPT is as dead as a doornail anyway, largely due to the political pressures you yourselves have brought to bear against any enforcement against violators. So let's take the next step, shall we, and see that sane, friendly nations are well equipped (and monitored, as India is not today).
 
shoulderblade said:
True. In fact testing them would be a very dangerous idea.


Fuck. They are in the Soviet Unions hip pocket and The USSR is gearing up as well.

The Government here knows it....they just dont want the people to know it in total because they want the Dow Jones Index over 13000.

:rolleyes:


Im tellin you man. People are gonna go after us soon enough, and it aint gonna be some punk ass terrorists with bombs strapped to their chests.

Why do you think they want India to build more nukes?

So they can point them at the soviet union, and Iran.
 
shoulderblade said:
True. In fact testing them would be a very dangerous idea.


There's no evidence to support the claims KS suggests. And again, India already has weapons-grade nuclear capability. So does Pakistan. They freely admit it, and they've been at each other's throats since the region won its independence.

And guess who armed them both. That's right. We did.

About a month or so ago, I got the chance to examine the scorched ruins of Baghdad while on my first convoy. Even under night vision, the level of desolation appalled me. What was clearly once a beautiful urban center, full of tree-lined residential streets and lush parks, is now a junkyard. Buildings blown out and abandoned; trees felled by blasts; highways marked with bomb craters EVERY SIXTY FEET. Citizens are killing each other more than they're attacking US forces anymore, and even so are under curfew because me and my fellow soldiers can't operate safely when they're around.

This entire country has been reduced to agraveyard , and thousands of lives ended--on both sides-- based on false predications and trollish hype like the sort Killswitch spouts. We can't afford this kind of hypocrisy.

Arming our friends knowing the rivalries they hold, while actively trying to sell the public on first-strike nuclear action against a country which has to date NEVER violated the NNPT? The only thing more sickening than the idea is how many people are willing to justify such genocide. And yes, a first-strike nuclear attack would pretty soundly constitute genocide.

Truth be told, I'm glad we are too overstretched to make good on such jingoism. I'd hate to see such waste happen again.
 
Killswitch said:
Fuck. They are in the Soviet Unions hip pocket and The USSR is gearing up as well.

The Government here knows it....they just dont want the people to know it in total because they want the Dow Jones Index over 13000.

Hell, KS, you were jerkin' your gherkin whenever you thought of Ahmadenijahd getting nukes, and he's a crazy as a shithouse rat. Why the sudden concern?

India hasn't been in Russia's orbit for some time, get with the program. It's only going to become friendlier with the US as a result of this agreement...we're already their biggest trading partner.

Oh, and Sid, it wasn't the US that got India its weapons-grade fissile capability...it was Canada. Sorry to interrupt you in mid-flagellation. Similarly, it was China that bootstrapped Pakistan into the nuclear age, not the US.
 
Last edited:
Siddhartha said:
There's no evidence to support the claims KS suggests. And again, India already has weapons-grade nuclear capability. So does Pakistan. They freely admit it, and they've been at each other's throats since the region won its independence.

And guess who armed them both. That's right. We did.


Of course there is. Its just not a talking point on Fox News.

And India and Pakistan have weapons. Not just weapons grade materials.

We armed Iran as well.

Its like Cool Hand Luke.

What he want's. He gets it.

Ya see......
 
Killswitch said:
Of course there is. Its just not a talking point on Fox News.

And India and Pakistan have weapons. Not just weapons grade materials.

We armed Iran as well.

Its like Cool Hand Luke.

What he want's. He gets it.

Ya see......

Reasserting baseless claims is not the same thing as backing them up. BTW, Pakistan maintains that their fissile material, detonators, delivery systems, etc. are all disassembled and stored in separate places. So while they have capability, they do not have ready-to-go weapons.
 
Killswitch said:
If anyone thinks Iran doesn't have ICBM tipped Nukes you are naive.

Just because they dont have to test them doesn't mean they dont have them.

Wouldn't they work better if the Nukes were on the tips of the ICBMs. I don't want to be around when they test them.
 
Even as sick as I am with the flu, reading KS's discussion of foreign policy still brings a smile to my face.

In fact, when I think about him actually getting to vote, I LOL!
 
bronzeage said:
Wouldn't they work better if the Nukes were on the tips of the ICBMs. I don't want to be around when they test them.
Nothing to worry about. All you have to do is be where they are aimed at. Since the missiles are based on NK technology, you can pretty much be sure they aren't going to land where they're pointed.
 
Back
Top