Bludgeoning the right wing to death

MzDeviancy said:
Damn you! You're pure evil! Luring me away from my righteous anger!

You're like Darth Vader in that whole scene in Return of the Jedi. But instead of a light saber, you're brandishing the really cool vibrators with all the funky attachments...

I'm so confused...

Don't be confused.

Vibrators - chocolate - did I forget to mention rum?

Yeah, rum - :heart:

(Bring extra batteries if you can - I think we're running low. Need to make a Walgreens run pretty soon.)
 
minsue said:
I'll be rational with ya, Roxalby. Go round up the horsey and we can all be rational together. ;)
Alright!

But that sex and chocolate over on the hippie left is looking kinda tempting . . .

Libertarians are friendly to sex, also, but they're mostly a bunch of geeks who are all talk.

In Republican circles there's a saying: "Date Democrat, marry Republican."
 
Roxanne Appleby said:
In Republican circles there's a saying: "Date Democrat, marry Republican."
Of course they do! Who else would marry a Republican? :confused: :D
 
sweetsubsarahh said:
No sex after marriage, then?

:confused:
No sex with others after marriage. All very proper and straightlaced. Positively Victorian. But this is only hearsay . . .
 
sweetsubsarahh said:
No sex after marriage, then?

:confused:
Yes, but only if you want kids :rolleyes: Sex is for procreation, don't ya know? That's why homosexuals can't be allowed to marry.
 
3113 said:
Yes, but only if you want kids :rolleyes: Sex is for procreation, don't ya know? That's why homosexuals can't be allowed to marry.

And don't forget, no women on top. Missionary only. :rolleyes:
 
3113 said:
Yes, but only if you want kids :rolleyes: Sex is for procreation, don't ya know? That's why homosexuals can't be allowed to marry.
You're mixing up the Republicans with the Catholics, dear. The Catholics are quite catholic in their political affiliations.
 
cheerful_deviant said:
I thought that was self evident. ;)

Oh, and women aren't allowed to enjoy it.


My God!

Where is the ACLU! What kind of world do we live in???
 
sweetsubsarahh said:
Next thing you'll be saying is no oral or anal sex.
Gasp! Don't you know that in right-thinking states it USED to be illegal for anyone to have anal sex? Even the heterosexuals? And then those darn liberal, pro-active judges on the Supreme court had to get involved and now it's so much harder to make laws restricting how people fuck. It's so unAmerican!
 
cheerful_deviant said:
Thankfully, not a monochromatic one. :cool:

Phew. That's right.

This isn't everyone.

(I was concerned for a moment, there.)

:kiss:
 
3113 said:
Gasp! Don't you know that in right-thinking states it USED to be illegal for anyone to have anal sex? Even the heterosexuals? And then those darn liberal, pro-active judges on the Supreme court had to get involved and now it's so much harder to make laws restricting how people fuck. It's so unAmerican!

In Kansas it was, my own state, not so long ago.

Anti-sodomy laws still on the damn books.

Frightening as hell, really.
 
3113 said:
Gasp! Don't you know that in right-thinking states it USED to be illegal for anyone to have anal sex? Even the heterosexuals? And then those darn liberal, pro-active judges on the Supreme court had to get involved and now it's so much harder to make laws restricting how people fuck. It's so unAmerican!
The judges said if you're not going to let gay people fuck each other in the ass, then you can't let straight people do it either.

Most state legislatures quickly repealed the prohibition. Legislators couldn't imagine not being allowed to fuck people in the ass. It's what they do.
 
sweetsubsarahh said:
In Kansas it was, my own state, not so long ago.

Anti-sodomy laws still on the damn books.

Frightening as hell, really.
Ours was finally removed a couple of years ago, but only because it was only part of one law that also made cohabitating illegal and the large elderly widow/widower population here didn't want to have to get remarried (thus losing out on social security payments), but did want to live together legally.
 
Roxanne Appleby said:
The judges said if you're not going to let gay people fuck each other in the ass, then you can't let straight people do it either.

Most state legislatures quickly repealed the prohibition. Legislators couldn't imagine not being allowed to fuck people in the ass. It's what they do.
. :D .
 
Roxanne Appleby said:
The judges said if you're not going to let gay people fuck each other in the ass, then you can't let straight people do it either.

Most state legislatures quickly repealed the prohibition. Legislators couldn't imagine not being allowed to fuck people in the ass. It's what they do.

:cathappy:
 
Roxanne Appleby said:
The judges said if you're not going to let gay people fuck each other in the ass, then you can't let straight people do it either.

Most state legislatures quickly repealed the prohibition. Legislators couldn't imagine not being allowed to fuck people in the ass. It's what they do.
Precious. :D
 
minsue said:
Ours was finally removed a couple of years ago, but only because it was only part of one law that also made cohabitating illegal and the large elderly widow/widower population here didn't want to have to get remarried (thus losing out on social security payments), but did want to live together legally.
They probably wanted to have anal sex too...kinky old farts! :D
 
Just lurking . . . Too frightened to offer an opinion (except that I want to volunteer for sweetsubsarahh's group).
 
S-Des said:
Just lurking . . . Too frightened to offer an opinion (except that I want to volunteer for sweetsubsarahh's group).

The more the merrier.

:kiss:
 
Back
Top