Judge Forces Feds To Reveal More Evidence Of Social Media Censorship

[Rightguide]

Censorship

Judge Forces Feds To Reveal More Evidence Of Social Media Censorship​

By: Joy Pullmann
November 10, 2024
5 min read

A federal judge agreed to expand Missouri v. Biden to procure more evidence federal officials violated Americans’ free speech rights.

ore internal government communications will soon be revealed in a high-profile censorship case that already hit the U.S. Supreme Court, thanks to a Friday court ruling in Missouri v. Biden. The historic free speech case uncovered that federal officials, all the way up to President Joe Biden, pressured social media companies to remove specific posts and discussion terms, systemically slanting society in favor of Democrats by controlling public discussions.

After the Supreme Court ruled in June that the plaintiffs didn’t meet the higher legal standard for a preliminary injunction against government officials, as the case moved forward, the case went back to a Louisiana district court, where it originated. The judge in that case, Terry Doughty, on Friday allowed the plaintiffs to obtain more public records, which they say will help establish that federal officials specifically targeted their speech on social media monopolies such as Facebook, Google, and X.

“Because we find that Plaintiffs have demonstrated the necessity of jurisdictional discovery, and because their proposed discovery does not appear to be a jurisdictional fishing expedition—Plaintiffs shall have the opportunity to conduct such discovery,” Doughty wrote in his Nov. 8 ruling.

The plaintiffs include the states of Missouri and Louisiana; prominent doctors Jayanta Bhattacharya, Aaron Kheriaty, and Martin Kulldorff; and citizens Jill Hines and Jim Hoft. They are suing numerous federal agencies and officials, including Biden, national security bureaucracies such as the Department of Homeland Security and FBI, and health bureaucracies such as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control.

https://thefederalist.com/2024/11/1...eal-more-evidence-of-social-media-censorship/

The reckoning is coming.

 

[Rebel5soul]

The timing couldn't be better to help in the elimination of their 'employed' status.

 

[ll74]

Censorship

Judge Forces Feds To Reveal More Evidence Of Social Media Censorship​

By: Joy Pullmann
November 10, 2024
5 min read

A federal judge agreed to expand Missouri v. Biden to procure more evidence federal officials violated Americans’ free speech rights.

ore internal government communications will soon be revealed in a high-profile censorship case that already hit the U.S. Supreme Court, thanks to a Friday court ruling in Missouri v. Biden. The historic free speech case uncovered that federal officials, all the way up to President Joe Biden, pressured social media companies to remove specific posts and discussion terms, systemically slanting society in favor of Democrats by controlling public discussions.

After the Supreme Court ruled in June that the plaintiffs didn’t meet the higher legal standard for a preliminary injunction against government officials, as the case moved forward, the case went back to a Louisiana district court, where it originated. The judge in that case, Terry Doughty, on Friday allowed the plaintiffs to obtain more public records, which they say will help establish that federal officials specifically targeted their speech on social media monopolies such as Facebook, Google, and X.

“Because we find that Plaintiffs have demonstrated the necessity of jurisdictional discovery, and because their proposed discovery does not appear to be a jurisdictional fishing expedition—Plaintiffs shall have the opportunity to conduct such discovery,” Doughty wrote in his Nov. 8 ruling.

The plaintiffs include the states of Missouri and Louisiana; prominent doctors Jayanta Bhattacharya, Aaron Kheriaty, and Martin Kulldorff; and citizens Jill Hines and Jim Hoft. They are suing numerous federal agencies and officials, including Biden, national security bureaucracies such as the Department of Homeland Security and FBI, and health bureaucracies such as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control.

https://thefederalist.com/2024/11/1...eal-more-evidence-of-social-media-censorship/

The reckoning is coming.

A quick reminder of past rulings:

Supreme Court Finds That Internet Platforms Have Free Speech Rights Over Content Decisions

The Court held that social media platforms, as private parties, have First Amendment rights, separate from their users. They are free to moderate users’ content and to determine what content is shown in their users’ feeds and what is amplified or blocked

 

[Rebel5soul]

A quick reminder of past rulings:

Supreme Court Finds That Internet Platforms Have Free Speech Rights Over Content Decisions

Not the issue dummy.

 

[ll74]

Not the issue dummy.

Social media and free speech aren't the issues being discussed?

 

[Politruk]

Censorship

Judge Forces Feds To Reveal More Evidence Of Social Media Censorship​

By: Joy Pullmann
November 10, 2024
5 min read

A federal judge agreed to expand Missouri v. Biden to procure more evidence federal officials violated Americans’ free speech rights.

ore internal government communications will soon be revealed in a high-profile censorship case that already hit the U.S. Supreme Court, thanks to a Friday court ruling in Missouri v. Biden. The historic free speech case uncovered that federal officials, all the way up to President Joe Biden, pressured social media companies to remove specific posts and discussion terms, systemically slanting society in favor of Democrats by controlling public discussions.

After the Supreme Court ruled in June that the plaintiffs didn’t meet the higher legal standard for a preliminary injunction against government officials, as the case moved forward, the case went back to a Louisiana district court, where it originated. The judge in that case, Terry Doughty, on Friday allowed the plaintiffs to obtain more public records, which they say will help establish that federal officials specifically targeted their speech on social media monopolies such as Facebook, Google, and X.

“Because we find that Plaintiffs have demonstrated the necessity of jurisdictional discovery, and because their proposed discovery does not appear to be a jurisdictional fishing expedition—Plaintiffs shall have the opportunity to conduct such discovery,” Doughty wrote in his Nov. 8 ruling.

The plaintiffs include the states of Missouri and Louisiana; prominent doctors Jayanta Bhattacharya, Aaron Kheriaty, and Martin Kulldorff; and citizens Jill Hines and Jim Hoft. They are suing numerous federal agencies and officials, including Biden, national security bureaucracies such as the Department of Homeland Security and FBI, and health bureaucracies such as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control.

https://thefederalist.com/2024/11/1...eal-more-evidence-of-social-media-censorship/

The reckoning is coming.

That's The Federalist, you idiot.

• Overall, we rate The Federalist Questionable and far-Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.