Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What the fuck is a "cabol?" I mean, she's a witch so did you mean "coven?"Get 'Their Candidate' in place without any opposition? It's not like Harris would have built up a cabol all on her own. Like Biden said to Obama, "she isn't as strong as me."![]()
You're a fucking idiot.Our local professors around here explained that Biden was sharp as a tack, replacing him was political suicide, and he was gonna win easily.
But once the elite democrat puppet masters threw Biden out and installed Harris (you know, democracy!), the good little leftie lemmings immediately fell in line.
![]()
Why would the President bend the knee to MSM, doesn't Biden work for and represent the people?Once it became clear that the MSM was obsessed with Biden’s age, the President himself decided to pass the torch to Harris
Mr. SuckToy, you are one of the least competent trolls on Lit.Why would the President bend the knee to MSM, doesn't Biden work for and represent the people?
The MSM treated any gaffe by President Biden as proof of senility, while ignoring the obvious mental incapacity of Donald Trump. The press has been trying as hard as they can to get Donald Trump elected.Why would the President bend the knee to MSM, doesn't Biden work for and represent the people?
So then that means you agree the press can be hostile to one candidate and be promoting the other? In other words, completely biased and unfair, failing their duty to be impartial and objective, perhaps even rightfully slapped with the label 'fake news'?The MSM treated any gaffe by President Biden as proof of senility, while ignoring the obvious mental incapacity of Donald Trump. The press has been trying as hard as they can to get Donald Trump elected.
Bias is not the same as fake.So then that means you agree the press can be hostile to one candidate and be promoting the other? In other words, completely biased and unfair, failing their duty to be impartial and objective, perhaps even rightfully slapped with the label 'fake news'?
So you're saying that he lost support from his party and decided to drop out rather than suffer a horrible loss?Biden's ouster was a bloodless coup perpetrated against him by his own party, the masters at the DNC, and the Hollyweird elite. Once they all turned on him it was pretty evident that he stood little chance of re-election. Rather than suffer the humiliation of continued public attacks about his health and sanity he bowed out.
The MSM has been totally in the tank for Donald Trump and working to get him elected.So then that means you agree the press can be hostile to one candidate and be promoting the other? In other words, completely biased and unfair, failing their duty to be impartial and objective, perhaps even rightfully slapped with the label 'fake news'?
He’s great for Ratings!The MSM has been totally in the tank for Donald Trump and working to get him elected.
Everyone wanted him to step down.Obama and a few other party leaders wanted his addled ass gone so they kicked him to the curb.
It was Pelosi's plan all along. Biden should have had her arrested for conspiracy.Get 'Their Candidate' in place without any opposition? It's not like Harris would have built up a cabol all on her own. Like Biden said to Obama, "she isn't as strong as me."![]()
I haven’t heard a single Democrat complaining about Harris replacing Biden. The only people upset about the switch are Republicans.3 days until the day of the election and they’re still whining about how, checks notes, the democrats chose their candidate.
Good people should be pessimistic so vote but take heart that THEY are the minority and the ones scared.
That's because you aren't listening to your own sources:I haven’t heard a single Democrat complaining about Harris replacing Biden. The only people upset about the switch are Republicans.
One theory: Biden was their tentative candidate that was on probation because of his age. His performance in the first debate would determine whether they would replace him. For the 2020 election, the first debate was September 29. For 2024, the first debate was moved to June 27 so that there would be more time to get a replacement candidate's campaign up and running before the election.
Was there already a consensus to get rid of him before the debate? I don't know. However, within minutes of the conclusion of the debate, there seemed to be almost unanimous consensus that it was bad. I was surprised at how unified the media's and pundit's opinions were about Biden's performance. He performed about as well as I expected, and I expected to see more defense of his performance afterwards.
I'm not emotionally tied to this theory, so feel free to disagree.