USA Russia Merger?

[Lance_Castro]

https://images.45cat.com/the-beach-boys-wouldnt-it-be-nice-1966-13.jpgI see Elon Musk is acting as the go-between for Vlad & Donald

What was that line from 2016?…. “ Wouldn’t it be nice if Russia and the USA were friends?”

 

[ll74]

Wtf are you talking about?

 

[Politruk]

Something about the cool teenage beach scene at Sochi.

 

[Lance_Castro]

“WASHINGTON -
Russia has helped amplify and spread false and misleading internet claims about recent hurricanes in the United States and the federal government's response, part of a wider effort by the Kremlin to manipulate America's political discourse before the presidential election, new research shows.”


Maybe it’s time for the USA to get serious about backing Ukraine , blow up a bunch of russian shit and destabilize or assassinate Poutine.

 

[Politruk]

Maybe it’s time for the USA to get serious about backing Ukraine , blow up a bunch of russian shit and destabilize or assassinate Poutine.

Appealing, but, that course presents too much risk of nuclear escalation.

 

[PaxNurgle]

We can start, however, by kicking off the "outed" Russian trolls/bots from this forum (E.G.Saint Ann, and Rightguide.) I really wish the admins had more clout in this regard.

 

[ChloeTzang]

We can start, however, by kicking off the "outed" Russian trolls/bots from this forum (E.G.Saint Ann, and Rightguide.) I really wish the admins had more clout in this regard.

Blah blah blah. Of course you wish that. You're a fascist with no tolerance for opinions other than your own. Why not just talk to yourself, you'll be much happier.

 

[Saint_Ann]

China would shit but what to do with Iran? Let Israel handle it?

 

[Lance_Castro]

“Musk might be pushing America toward a new retro-futurism: the world of Ford and Hearst freely courting some of America’s worst enemies, with government helpless to rein them in and only their personal worldviews and consciences to dictate the terms of those relationships.”

 

[ll74]

“Musk might be pushing America toward a new retro-futurism: the world of Ford and Hearst freely courting some of America’s worst enemies, with government helpless to rein them in and only their personal worldviews and consciences to dictate the terms of those relationships.”

This quote is a lie.

 

[Politruk]

China would shit but what to do with Iran? Let Israel handle it?

Israel can't win a war with Iran.

 

[Lance_Castro]

This quote is a lie.

Those lying fucks at CNN! Fake news!

 

[ll74]

Those lying fucks at CNN! Fake news!

Of course ..that's what it's from

 

[Saint_Ann]

Israel can't win a war with Iran.

Sure they can. Take Russia out of the equation. Ayatollahs taken out internally. It's not like We aren't helping them already.

 

[PaxNurgle]

Blah blah blah. Of course you wish that. You're a fascist with no tolerance for opinions other than your own. Why not just talk to yourself, you'll be much happier.

Your opinions are incompatible with common decency, or a free, civilized and just society. No decent person should tolerate such opinions. Ironically you call me "Fascist" yet that is exactly the type of ideology you are always shamelessly trying to promote.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Your opinions are incompatible with common decency, or a free, civilized and just society. No decent person should tolerate such opinions. Ironically you call me "Fascist" yet that is exactly the type of ideology you are always shamelessly trying to promote.

"She's a gremlinnnnnnnn
from the Kremlinnnnnnnnn."

 

[ChloeTzang]

Your opinions are incompatible with common decency, or a free, civilized and just society. No decent person should tolerate such opinions. Ironically you call me "Fascist" yet that is exactly the type of ideology you are always shamelessly trying to promote.

Ah, but I DON'T advocate silencing you, incarcerating you or whatever, and personally I would say your views, opinions and policies are, as you phrase it, incompatible with common decency, or a free, civilized and just society. I however prefer an open, honest and fraud-free electoral system with results everyone can have faith in, tied to a Constitution and political system which prevents a dictatorship by whoever emerging. YOU on the other hand, want to silence and stifle the opposition, criminalize their views and ignore laws when they don't suit you. Go figure who's the fascist in reality.

 

[Politruk]

Go figure who's the fascist in reality.

"Fascist" is not simply another word for "authoritarian." Communists, e.g., are never fascists.

 

[ChloeTzang]

"Fascist" is not simply another word for "authoritarian." Communists, e.g., are never fascists.

Totalitarian. Fascists and Communists are just two sides of the same coin

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Ah, but I DON'T advocate silencing you, incarcerating you or whatever, and personally I would say your views, opinions and policies are, as you phrase it, incompatible with common decency, or a free, civilized and just society. I however prefer an open, honest and fraud-free electoral system with results everyone can have faith in, tied to a Constitution and political system which prevents a dictatorship by whoever emerging. YOU on the other hand, want to silence and stifle the opposition, criminalize their views and ignore laws when they don't suit you. Go figure who's the fascist in reality.

Trump advocates silencing them and incarcerating them, yet you're still a die hard trumptard.

Go figure who's the fascist in reality.

 

[ChloeTzang]

Trump advocates silencing them and incarcerating them, yet you're still a die hard trumptard.

Go figure who's the fascist in reality.

Nope. Just incarcerating the Democrat criminals, and personally I think there's a good few should swing for treason. Starting with Mayorkas. An example needs to be made.

 

[Politruk]

Nope. Just incarcerating the Democrat criminals, and personally I think there's a good few should swing for treason. Starting with Mayorkas. An example needs to be made.

On November 23, 2020, Mayorkas was nominated by President-elect Joe Biden for the position of Secretary of Homeland Security. Mayorkas's nomination received the endorsement of the Fraternal Order of Police and several former secretaries.[7][8] He was confirmed by the Senate on a 56–43 vote on February 2, 2021, facing significant Republican opposition[9] over his stance on immigration, particularly his support for halting border wall construction and advocating for a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants. He was sworn in by Vice President Kamala Harris the same day.[10]

That's pretty much the opposite of a traitor.

 

[PaxNurgle]

Ah, but I DON'T advocate silencing you, incarcerating you or whatever, and personally I would say your views, opinions and policies are, as you phrase it, incompatible with common decency, or a free, civilized and just society. I however prefer an open, honest and fraud-free electoral system with results everyone can have faith in, tied to a Constitution and political system which prevents a dictatorship by whoever emerging. YOU on the other hand, want to silence and stifle the opposition, criminalize their views and ignore laws when they don't suit you. Go figure who's the fascist in reality.

Do you REALIZE how much you contradict yourself here?? Do you even have any self-awareness?

"Nope. Just incarcerating the Democrat criminals, and personally I think there's a good few should swing for treason. Starting with Mayorkas. An example needs to be made.".
This is how violent, oppressive dictatorships work. Not civilized, peaceful democracies.

And no, you clearly DONT want an open, honest, and fraud free electoral system, if you cannot and will not accept the results of it when they don't go your way. You want a one-party system where even if the main candidate loses, he is appointed to office anyway.

 

[ChloeTzang]

Do you REALIZE how much you contradict yourself here?? Do you even have any self-awareness?

"Nope. Just incarcerating the Democrat criminals, and personally I think there's a good few should swing for treason. Starting with Mayorkas. An example needs to be made.".
This is how violent, oppressive dictatorships work. Not civilized, peaceful democracies.

And no, you clearly DONT want an open, honest, and fraud free electoral system, if you cannot and will not accept the results of it when they don't go your way. You want a one-party system where even if the main candidate loses, he is appointed to office anyway.

There's opposition, and then there are treasonous criminals.

 

[Bray123]

There's opposition, and then there are treasonous criminals.

Like people who tell others to create fake votes to steal elections so they can overturn the Constitution.