Kamala’s 2024 Presidential Run

I guess we’ll find out in a couple of weeks!

(But you were wrong in 2016 and 2020.)

White Women like Trump
Black men like Trump
Hispanics like Trump
White working men like Trump
Rich people like Trump.

Good luck!
That's wrong on most points -- see post #2,309.
 
The Dem (not liberal, because I don't see many liberals there*) lecturing has lately been nonstop about everything, an indication of a perceived position of power. Vote blue or be a racist, sexist, anything ist. Anyone who claims to be a woman is automatically a woman and should be allowed to use women's restrooms, play women's sports, etc. Illegal immigrants should be allowed in by the millions and given money, free lodgings, and transportation to swing states. People should be required to buy EVs instead of gas engine cars, while completely ignoring the actual solutions in walkable cities. And then gun control, healthcare, the vaccines, etc. I ignored that question earlier because I didn't feel like starting this rant.

*Bernie may be their only legitimate liberal. Shutting him out of the primaries indicates where the rest of the party sits.

🙄

Correcting falsehoods and highlighting the racist, sexist, fascist words and actions of DonOld and the MAGAt "republicans" is NOT "lecturing".

😑

Hope that ^ helps.

👍

👉 Sternosot 🤣

🇺🇸
 
She blames her lack of intelligence on a subordinate. Typical incompetence. How many LGBTQXXXXX's are there in the population? Well Catholics are like 22% of the population. How friggin' dumb can she be?
How dumb are you to believe a post by a proven liar who posted random words with no source?

Very fucking dumb.
 
Trump landslide is looking more and more likely.

Sounds like an easy bet for you to win, then. What's your wager? Will you leave Lit if you're wrong?

No - you won't make that bet. Because you don't believe a word you're posting. 🥰
 
Oh we all know they are going to do their best to cheat. They're going to do it blatantly and openly. After all, it worked last time.
You're not wrong. Hopefully though we're at the point where voter turnout for Trump can overwhelm their cheating efforts. And I seriously hope last election was a wake up call for enough people to ensure they crack down on any cheating or fraud anywhere from anyone.
 
Even here, I have now had to ask you - twice - what exactly you feel you are being lectured about and instead you deflect to "both sidesism". Which hey, if you want to play that then do so. But own it. Instead what you are doing is playing at an attempt to be unbiased. If you want to be sincere, and credible, your next post to me will include not only how you feel lectured to by democrats/liberals but also by republicans/conservatives. Let's see if you can do that.

The Dem (not liberal, because I don't see many liberals there*) lecturing has lately been nonstop about everything, an indication of a perceived position of power. Vote blue or be a racist, sexist, anything ist. Anyone who claims to be a woman is automatically a woman and should be allowed to use women's restrooms, play women's sports, etc. Illegal immigrants should be allowed in by the millions and given money, free lodgings, and transportation to swing states. People should be required to buy EVs instead of gas engine cars, while completely ignoring the actual solutions in walkable cities. And then gun control, healthcare, the vaccines, etc. I ignored that question earlier because I didn't feel like starting this rant.

*Bernie may be their only legitimate liberal. Shutting him out of the primaries indicates where the rest of the party sits.


Nope.

And honestly most of your post is based more around hyperbole than reality. However I'm not going to waste my time going through it because as you couldn't list the other side of the "both sides", you aren't credible. Every time you say both sides anything I will remember this exchange and know that while you claimed that both sides do it, you could once again only come up with the democrat/liberal side.

Go about your airy fairy bullshit.
 
Pleading for the opposition to not vote indicates just how nervous you are about the election results. 🫢😄
No, saying that the convict who has been blasted in both popular votes and barely won the electoral once will win in a landslide is the true sign of desperation.

But we know the critical thinking escapes you dipshits.
 
No, saying that the convict who has been blasted in both popular votes and barely won the electoral once will win in a landslide is the true sign of desperation.

But we know the critical thinking escapes you dipshits.
Me: "I think Trump can win in a landslide."
You: "Don't vote for Trump!"

Ya, I'm the one coming across as desperate. Like, totally. 🫢😄
 
Me: "I think Trump can win in a landslide."
You: "Don't vote for Trump!"

Ya, I'm the one coming across as desperate. Like, totally. 🫢😄
You come across as desperate when you talk about Democrats cheating. When Pubs use a non-problem like voter fraud as an excuse to make it harder to vote, that's cheating, and they only do it because they're desperate -- because not even they believe they can win fairly any more.
 
You come across as desperate when you talk about Democrats cheating. When Pubs use a non-problem like voter fraud as an excuse to make it harder to vote, that's cheating, and they only do it because they're desperate -- because not even they believe they can win fairly any more.
So then we're in agreement the election should be as fair, legal and fraud free as possible, either way, as decided by American citizens. 👍
 
Back
Top