Harris for President

The misogynistic response alone writes her campaign for her. I was more focused on the rally cry behind her, but damned if the right isn't doing a great job of getting votes to Harris. The initial bump poll is going to be fun.
 
You really do have a comprehension problem. I clearly stated the last three presidents have separated families illegally crossing the border. There are reasons why. You are ignoring all that and trying to say one doing it doesn’t equal the other. It’s US policy that dictates it. You don’t care about that though.
Thanks for proving my point yet again that you can’t do context

Just keep doubling down on your false pic meme. True Faith my man.
You don’t even realize those pics are actually kind of irrelevant, the article is relevant. Apparently, you also have difficulty tracking the main theme of things

He's too dumb to know that everywhere in our society we separate all families once one or more of its member are arrested and taken into custody.
And your too dumb not to conflate two different things
 
What’s Obamas reason for holding out ?

The money and thus the momentum are with Harris it seems, and she’s had the advantage of a head start and appears to have used it well.

Does he favour a more open field, or is he holding out to influence the choice of running mate ?

Should we assume there are other potential candidates who can stay in the game financially whilever this is still open ?
 
What’s Obamas reason for holding out ?

The money and thus the momentum are with Harris it seems, and she’s had the advantage of a head start and appears to have used it well.

Does he favour a more open field, or is he holding out to influence the choice of running mate ?

Should we assume there are other potential candidates who can stay in the game financially whilever this is still open ?

iran doesn't want to deal with a female president.
 
What’s Obamas reason for holding out ?

The money and thus the momentum are with Harris it seems, and she’s had the advantage of a head start and appears to have used it well.

Does he favour a more open field, or is he holding out to influence the choice of running mate ?

Should we assume there are other potential candidates who can stay in the game financially whilever this is still open ?
I think he's wanting a promise or commitment from Harris. Possibly the VP pick preference for someone he's pushing?
 
I'm impressed you steered clear from personal misogynistic attacks....that must've been difficult for you.
Harris and the concept of national leadership is an absurdity. There is a reason why women have never been elected President in the US. They cannot and do not project the levels of leadership and strength that men do. Despite the fantasies of the left they cannot escape the realities of biology. Americans want to see at least the DNA of a warrior in their Commander in Chief commanding the most lethal military force in the World. Europeans can do otherwise in their preference of projecting weakness. Americans are different. The strongest force in the World today is manhood fueled by testosterone. It builds and maintains civilization. Its the fundamental biological strength of men that in the final analysis enforces the laws and protects the rights of women and the weak. Traditionally, Americans have demanded the strongest qualities of leadership at the highest levels and here in the US that means men. Female leadership is emotional leadership. It's about what they feel as opposed to what they know. It has failed us in the educational field, the corporate world, in the public space, and where they lead they have degraded the military. Just like they would degrade professional men's sports if they were allowed in the NBA, MLB, NFL, or men's Olympic competition. We have to face reality.
 
Harris and the concept of national leadership is an absurdity. There is a reason why women have never been elected President in the US. They cannot and do not project the levels of leadership and strength that men do. Despite the fantasies of the left they cannot escape the realities of biology. Americans want to see at least the DNA of a warrior in their Commander in Chief commanding the most lethal military force in the World.

Three obvious points …

  1. Your comment is a textbook example of misogyny.
  2. Donnie ā€œBone Spursā€ is the antithesis of a warrior.
  3. You’re giving off a strong ā€œcloseted gay man in denialā€ vibe with your wimpy imitation of masculinity.
 
Three obvious points …

  1. Your comment is a textbook example of misogyny.
  2. Donnie ā€œBone Spursā€ is the antithesis of a warrior.
  3. You’re giving off a strong ā€œcloseted gay man in denialā€ vibe with your wimpy imitation of masculinity.
He certainly seems to exhibit the traits of a classic closeted homosexual.
But he's a top, goddamnit, a TOP!
That makes him manly.

*nods*
 
Republicans are the ones that can handle Iran.

Harris is a sit com nightmare from Cheers.
Ok boomer.
I gotta stop you here.
I actually get and appreciate some of your 80’s and 90’s references but geez - read the room. Most here have no idea nor care what’s on late night Nickelodeon.
 
Back
Top