Why Biden Will Win

[RobDownSouth]

I agree that the white donor class and the mainstream media flipped out, but Joe Biden did a real jujitsu move this morning and flipped them all over his shoulder. Now its cop vs. con, and all the attacks on Biden's age can be used against Donald Trump.

I hadn't considered that, but it's actually a brilliant move.

 

[adrina]

They flipped out , yes - but that was in process before the debate even ended. Nothing to do with media.

Pelossi and Obama and Schumer were unwilling to commit to JB ever since said debate and that’s nothing to do with the media either.

Trumps ramblings were there for all to hear too, but since there’s no party or wider public collapse of support there’s nothing for media to report is there ?

Technically it was in process before it even started. They'd been harping on Biden's age like HRC's emails.

This was media assassination. You're not convincing anyone but your choir.

If a major candidate for the most powerful office in the world is rambling incoherently it should be front page news every day.

They failed and are still failing.

 

[adrina]

I hadn't considered that, but it's actually a brilliant move.

And after the RNC so they're stuck with Trump.

How'd ya like to spend the next four months defending Trump's age and incoherency.

 

[RandyRebecca]

Neither do you.

Neither do I, what?

Sorry but I'm gonna leave you to stew. You're single focus is not particularly desirable to deal with right now. Somewhere between no sleep, AC for the first time in almost 36 hours and the whirlwind of the last week... I just don't give two sheep shits about your lame ass self defeating perspective right now.

Have a good night. Or don't. Keep bitching. Whatevs.

Facing reality is a good thing, not going into denial.

I'd be most interested to see people's electoral maps where the Democrats realistically win in November, except for the 270-268 I pointed out. That map is basically the 2020 map, except where the Republicans win back Arizona and Georgia, and win Nevada, but the Democrats hold on to Nebraska's second congressional electoral vote.

I hadn't considered that, but it's actually a brilliant move.

Not really, because the Republicans will respond by asking why Biden hasn't resigned the presidency with immediate effect.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

Not really, because the Republicans will respond by asking why Biden hasn't resigned the presidency with immediate effect.

President Biden already anticipated this objection and said he's withdrawing from the race to concentrate on running the country.

 

[RandyRebecca]

President Biden already anticipated this objection and said he's withdrawing from the race to concentrate on running the country.

Naturally.

 

[ShandyLeer]

Technically it was in process before it even started. They'd been harping on Biden's age like HRC's emails.

This was media assassination. You're not convincing anyone but your choir.

If a major candidate for the most powerful office in the world is rambling incoherently it should be front page news every day.

They failed and are still failing.

The age of the 2 candidates was an issue for lots of people Adrina, you know this.

It’s not a media fail to report this simple fact.

Biden flubbing whilst on camera isn’t the broadcasters fault, not is their fault that people seem to not care that Trump says weird shit too.

 

[ShandyLeer]

President Biden already anticipated this objection and said he's withdrawing from the race to concentrate on running the country.

Yup, that’s the day up to lunchtime. Then a nice nap. Then bed.

 

[HisArpy]

Sorry dipshit, but as an example - genetic parentage is a fact that can be in conflict with the legal status.

Someone who committed murder but gets off on a technicality, like say the police mixed up evidence, still in fact is a murderer, regardless of what the legal outcome is in court.

Actually, no it can't. If a court says that someone is the genetic parent, then that's a fact. Legal status has zero fucks to do with it because that's a construct.

For instance, someone can be a genetic parent and have no legal status as a parent (because parental rights were terminated). Both of those things are FACTS.

See, your problem is that you have issues with facts. You have feelings and beliefs which you'd very much like to be factual, but they're not. They're only your feelings and beliefs.

Which is why you have TDS and why you cannot see that you're in conflict with yourself when it comes to reality.

 

[adrina]

The age of the 2 candidates was an issue for lots of people Adrina, you know this.

It’s not a media fail to report this simple fact.

Biden flubbing whilst on camera isn’t the broadcasters fault, not is their fault that people seem to not care that Trump says weird shit too.

And again, the one sided focus. You are reflecting the media driven narrative.

It IS a media fail when they lazer focus in on one issue with one while ignoring the giant neon albatross around the neck of the other.

 

[HisArpy]

And the big question now, for Harris, if she ends up being the one, is funding. When will sget get it, where from, and will it be enough to even allow her to put up a fight?Obviously the MSM will give her a LOT of free air time, but still, ads ARE important for visibility....and $'s for running campaign. Biden's funding does not automatically switch to Harris.

Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chairman Sean Cooksey announced today (Sunday) that all donations made to Joe Biden for the November election “shall be either returned or refunded” or redesignated “as appropriate” following his departure from the presidential race. The exceptions and loopholes for redesignating or reattributing the funds are clearly covered in the regulations. They all need to be done in writing, and that will take time. Since Biden had not yet formally been nominated he may not be legally able transfer his $100 million fighting fund to Harris. Before the nomination officially goes to Mr. Biden, his campaign is limited to donating $2,000 to the Democratic nominee, whether that new standard bearer is Gavin Newsom, Gretchen Whitmer or Ms. Harris.

The Biden for President campaign states that the committee was the principal campaign committee for both Mr. Biden and Ms. Harris. At the time nobody had reason to question that maneuver, and if at the Democratic convention Biden and Harris emerged as their party’s nominees, then there won’t be a need to challenge the premature designation. If, however, Mr. Biden were to drop out before being nominated and attempt an unprecedented and possibly illegal unlimited transfer of funds to Ms. Harris, the courts would likely interpret the plain language of the statute to prohibit such a contribution.

If President Biden is committed to passing the torch to his vice president, and wants to be able to seed her campaign with the current Biden for President campaign war chest, he’ll first have to become his party’s legal nominee. After shuffling through the Democratic National Committee’s planned roll call vote he’d be free to drop out. Ms. Harris could seamlessly slip into the driver’s seat. That’s a risky strategy, as it requires maintaining an obvious fiction under intense public scrutiny for another six weeks.

OMG this is going to be fun to watch.

The briefing on the issues is going to be epic. Lots of "expert" witness declarations saying this or that according to their political ideology and who is paying them to spout it.

On the one hand I'd love to have the courts listen and decide that the rules are the rules and Harris doesn't get the war chest.

On the other hand, I'd prefer that the convention go off smoothly so that Trump can trounce their Democrat butts no matter who they pick.


However, the one thing we can all be assured of; Lit's progressives will get their panties twisted tighter than a tourniquet with a 3 foot long cheater bar.

 

[HisArpy]

^^ The key is to force Donny out.

Your team tried that, the shooter missed.

 

[AlexBailey]

That is awesome. I am very happy to hear that. Sincerely.

I really like that one called you.

Thank you for telling me. I really do appreciate it.

Now just make sure they follow up with their enthusiasm and get to the polls.

I can’t hold my kids’ hands anymore, especially since they

Actually, no it can't. If a court says that someone is the genetic parent, then that's a fact. Legal status has zero fucks to do with it because that's a construct.

For instance, someone can be a genetic parent and have no legal status as a parent (because parental rights were terminated). Both of those things are FACTS.

See, your problem is that you have issues with facts. You have feelings and beliefs which you'd very much like to be factual, but they're not. They're only your feelings and beliefs.

Which is why you have TDS and why you cannot see that you're in conflict with yourself when it comes to reality.

Sigh. Yes, you kind of get it even if you can’t fully understand your own words.

Legal status is a construct, not necessarily fact.

It is possible for someone to have factually committed illegal acts even if they were not convicted of doing them.

I have very valid reasons for disliking and distrusting Trump. Do you have complete faith in the man?

Unlike your shilling to your political interests I can be honest about mine. I both respect Joe Biden and think he is having issues with cognitive decline.

 

[AlexBailey]

Your team tried that, the shooter missed.

You mean the factually republican registered shooter?

 

[ShandyLeer]

And again, the one sided focus. You are reflecting the media driven narrative.

It IS a media fail when they lazer focus in on one issue with one while ignoring the giant neon albatross around the neck of the other.

They aren’t ignoring any of Trumps gaffes, errors, lies or whatever. They’re there for all to see and hear - the debate, his rallies, his interviews. It’s all there.

But you’re holding media responsible for how the parties - or the viewing public - respond, or in Trumps case don’t respond, to what they broadcast.

The reality is Biden caused a panic in the influential ranks that resulted in todays news.

 

[adrina]

I can’t hold my kids’ hands anymore, especially since they

I'm in the hold everyone I know accountable to vote camp. Cuz I'm a pain in the ass.

 

[adrina]

They aren’t ignoring any of Trumps gaffes, errors, lies or whatever. They’re there for all to see and hear - the debate, his rallies, his interviews. It’s all there.

But you’re holding media responsible for how the parties - or the viewing public - respond, or in Trumps case don’t respond, to what they broadcast.

The reality is Biden caused a panic in the influential ranks that resulted in todays news.

You're going in circles and your blatant lack of willingness to hold the media accountable is a non-starter.

If you wish to continue this "discussion", have fun. I am bowing out due to lack of acceptance of reasonable givens by my "debate" "opponent".

 

[RobDownSouth]

Yup, that’s the day up to lunchtime. Then a nice nap. Then bed.

Thinking back to many of the days of convicted felon Donald J. Trump's one-term presidency, when the hours of 7 a.m to 11 a.m. were blocked off as "Executive Time" (i.e. the dotard watches Fox 'n Friends et al) and all the four day extended "working" (i.e. golf) trips.

 

[HisArpy]

I can’t hold my kids’ hands anymore, especially since they


Sigh. Yes, you kind of get it even if you can’t fully understand your own words.

Legal status is a construct, not necessarily fact.

It is possible for someone to have factually committed illegal acts even if they were not convicted of doing them.

I have very valid reasons for disliking and distrusting Trump. Do you have complete faith in the man?

Unlike your shilling to your political interests I can be honest about mine. I both respect Joe Biden and think he is having issues with cognitive decline.

Legal decisions are FACT. For instance, "Corporations are people" is a legal construct. Thus, in FACT, they are people.

Or do you wish to try to tell the SCOTUS that they're wrong when they decided that?

 

[JoePepsiCo]

What's he going to win?

 

[adrina]

SCOTUS was wrong for deciding that.

There, that was easy.

 

[HisArpy]

SCOTUS was wrong for deciding that.

There, that was easy.

Lol, if only...

 

[HisArpy]

What's he going to win?

A Kewpie doll at the carnival of dreams.

 

[adrina]

They were also wrong about the immunity ruling.

And Dobbs.

In fact they've been wrong about all sorts of things. But at least 5 of them aren't real jurists. They're heritage foundation "judges". So, partisan bench legislators.

 

[HisArpy]

They were also wrong about the immunity ruling.

And Dobbs.

In fact they've been wrong about all sorts of things. But at least 5 of them aren't real jurists. They're heritage foundation "judges". So, partisan bench legislators.

I think I mentioned that we'd be seeing all kinds of rants from those who made decisions in haste as things fall apart for them.

I just didn't realize that the ranting had already started.