Who will condemn Biden

[schism666]

All I know is my own response. If Trump is taken out, anyone I see celebrating WILL be taken out. That is not a threat any more than a rattlesnake rattling is a threat. It's a warning. And any democrat would be even more of a fool than the vegetable in the WH if they hope Trump is taken out. Because leftist kidfuckers will be destroyed. I will personally destroy my share.

You know what Law is? It's words...backed up by a gun. Well...I know words. I can them up as well. I guess I'm the law. Be careful what you wish for, globalist kid fuckers. Things may not be decided by ballots but bullets. I've got a few.

lololol

 

[censurat]

Mississippi Congressman’s Staffer Says ‘Don’t Miss Next Time’

 

[censurat]

 

[censurat]

2016: HE’S LITERALLY HITLER

2017: HE’S LITERALLY HITLER

2018: HE’S LITERALLY HITLER

2019: HE’S LITERALLY HITLER

2020: HE’S LITERALLY HITLER

2021: HE’S LITERALLY HITLER

2022: HE’S LITERALLY HITLER

2023: HE’S LITERALLY HITLER2024:

How dare you say our rhetoric caused this!

 

[1984X2024]

Exhortations to violence are obvious from one side

Denials notwithstanding

In 2024 it's 1984

 

[ll74]

Exhortations to violence are obvious from one side

Denials notwithstanding

In 2024 it's 1984

Both sides. Denials notwithstanding

 

[adrina]

 

[KeithD]

Both sides. Denials notwithstanding

Initiated and played hard almost entirely by the Republicans. "Both sides" is a pile of shit.

 

[ll74]

Initiated and played hard almost entirely by the Republicans. "Both sides" is a pile of shit.

The rhetoric has been escalated by both parties.

Ignore that however you need to

 

[1984X2024]

Was there a comparable to this

https://twitter.com/x/status/1812621954073161872

 

[1984X2024]

No, not both sides, unless you live in 1984

https://twitter.com/x/status/1812542089789595744

 

[ll74]

No, not both sides, unless you live in 1984

https://twitter.com/x/status/1812542089789595744

Of course, Bb

 

[YDB95]

On July 8 he was calling for putting Trump in a bullseye. Remember how many years of litigation and social condemnation Sarah Palin was subjected to for merely placing a crosshair target on the map of Arizona where Gabby Gifford was running?

"Merely" putting a crosshair target on someone who actually was shot in the head? Really?

But Democrats get a pass from their media.

Perhaps because Biden did not do what Palin did.

 

[KeithD]

The rhetoric has been escalated by both parties.

Ignore that however you need to

The Democrats have put Biden on the air waves multiple times now, and he's done what he can do to tamp the reaction and rhetoric down.

We can only imagine what Trump as president would do. He made a homosexual joke when Pelosi's husband was bludgeoned with a hammer.

This is not a same/same issue and I can guarantee Trump won't come anywhere up to Biden's level in dealing with this.

Thank God Joe Biden is president and Donald Trump isn't.

 

[Melanieishere]

The whole country

 

[ExxWhyZee]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1812726215385493795

 

[ChloeTzang]

Well, these are the type of candidates the Dems are putting forward - assassination supporting advocates of violent terrorism. So I'd say on the whole, Democrats are generally in favor of political assassinations of presidential candidates. Meets my definition of insurrection. So much for "calming the rhetoric" and all that bullshit.

Democrats need to take a long hard look at themselves and their candidates and - gasp - maybe dump the ones that support things like, you know, targeted assassinations of Presidential candidates.

But we know they won't.....

 

[ChloeTzang]

Secret Service resources were diverted away from Trump's rally to Jill Biden's Pittsburgh event at the same time. She said this was done because of "agency protocol applying to Trump as a former president," according to two of her sources within the Secret Service community. What the heck? So what they're saying is that because they were treating Trump just as a former president, not necessarily the current candidate with a lot of threats against him, Jill Biden was given priority over him. That wasn't all. Apparently there were problems because the team had a lot of replacements.

There were also many supplemental agents from different field offices who were not Trump's regular detail, providing security at the rally because Trump's regular detail has been overworked.

“Trump has a permanent detail, however it’s much smaller in the amount of bodies,” the source said. “His detail has been worked so hard with all the travel that they’re working 7 days a week with shift changes. so HQ sends in temp agents to supplement - not a good scenario. Mission Failure, IMHO.”

According to the report, there were only two counter-snipers.

"I’m told the only permanent agent from trump’s detail during the rally was SAIC (Special Agent In Charge) Kern, two sources within the Secret Service community told me. All others were temps," Crabtree reported. Pittsburgh "USSS Field Office had a Jill Biden visit and designated a lot of resources to her, the source said. Also - the advance work only occurred one-day beforehand bc of a lack of resources."
Where were the resources? The Pittsburgh USSS Field Office had a Jill Biden visit and designated a lot of resources to her. “That is f—-ing unbelievable to me,” the source remarked.

The Secret Service Chief of Communications, Anthony Guglielmi, responded to a prior report about there not being enough resources, denying that the Trump detail requested additional resources and those were rebuffed. "In fact, we added protective resources & technology capabilities as part of the increased campaign travel tempo," he said.

If that were true, why wasn't the roof covered properly? Why wasn't the shooter picked up from an area that should have been a top priority to make sure was safe since it was a high vantage point? If they had everything, then we're talking about the Secret Service just completely missing or not reacting to obvious dangers, and that would raise even more questions.

Can't question the courage of the members of the detail who moved in to protect Trump, but the whole thing looks like a shit show, and given the level of threat against Trump from deranged leftists, it would seem these have been deliberate moves to increase the risk to Trump by downplaying his security, just as the Biden Administration has done with RFK. Both Trump and RFK are far more at risk than Jill Biden, who, honestly, nobody gives a flying fuck about.

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/202...m-pa-trump-rally-to-jill-biden-visit-n2176871

 

[ll74]

Secret Service resources were diverted away from Trump's rally to Jill Biden's Pittsburgh event at the same time. She said this was done because of "agency protocol applying to Trump as a former president," according to two of her sources within the Secret Service community. What the heck? So what they're saying is that because they were treating Trump just as a former president, not necessarily the current candidate with a lot of threats against him, Jill Biden was given priority over him. That wasn't all. Apparently there were problems because the team had a lot of replacements.

There were also many supplemental agents from different field offices who were not Trump's regular detail, providing security at the rally because Trump's regular detail has been overworked.


According to the report, there were only two counter-snipers.



The Secret Service Chief of Communications, Anthony Guglielmi, responded to a prior report about there not being enough resources, denying that the Trump detail requested additional resources and those were rebuffed. "In fact, we added protective resources & technology capabilities as part of the increased campaign travel tempo," he said.

If that were true, why wasn't the roof covered properly? Why wasn't the shooter picked up from an area that should have been a top priority to make sure was safe since it was a high vantage point? If they had everything, then we're talking about the Secret Service just completely missing or not reacting to obvious dangers, and that would raise even more questions.

Can't question the courage of the members of the detail who moved in to protect Trump, but the whole thing looks like a shit show, and given the level of threat against Trump from deranged leftists, it would seem these have been deliberate moves to increase the risk to Trump by downplaying his security, just as the Biden Administration has done with RFK. Both Trump and RFK are far more at risk than Jill Biden, who, honestly, nobody gives a flying fuck about.

https://redstate.com/nick-arama/202...m-pa-trump-rally-to-jill-biden-visit-n2176871

This is a bullshit story

https://twitter.com/x/status/1812451649387933912

 

[ChloeTzang]

This is a bullshit story

https://twitter.com/x/status/1812451649387933912

Yeah, but that response from Guglielme is also being called bullshit. It'll all come out in the wash, but I don't discount that the story is true. It likely is, bit it's from a "source" so needs confirmation. Guglielmi is a spokesperson, and is obligated to toe the party line, so whatever he says has to be discounted to.

 

[ll74]

Yeah, but that response from Guglielme is also being called bullshit. It'll all come out in the wash, but I don't discount that the story is true. It likely is, bit it's from a "source" so needs confirmation. Guglielmi is a spokesperson, and is obligated to toe the party line, so whatever he says has to be discounted to.

No, the response from Twitter is "you failed" followed by random bullshit anger.

There is no evidence that resources were withheld and certainly when the focus of the source is on Jill Biden being the reason, I'd suggest it's political horseshit.

You don't discount it because of your bias.

Pretty much any story right now should be viewed with extreme skepticism as adversaries will be adding their bullshit to the streams of information.

 

[SmokingFap]

Reminder: Dems Tried To Strip Trump Of Secret Service Protection
Biden: ‘Time To Put Trump In The Bullseye’
Biden Megadonor: ‘I Wish I Had Made Trump An Actual Martyr’

It was all just locker room talk.

 

[PaxNurgle]

All I know is my own response. If Trump is taken out, anyone I see celebrating WILL be taken out. That is not a threat any more than a rattlesnake rattling is a threat. It's a warning. And any democrat would be even more of a fool than the vegetable in the WH if they hope Trump is taken out. Because leftist kidfuckers will be destroyed. I will personally destroy my share.

You know what Law is? It's words...backed up by a gun. Well...I know words. I can them up as well. I guess I'm the law. Be careful what you wish for, globalist kid fuckers. Things may not be decided by ballots but bullets. I've got a few.

No, it is a threat.

And rest assured, it has been reported to the admins.

 

[PaxNurgle]

Note that "Daddysissyslut"'s last two user accounts, Shybiguy and BidudeinWi, were both 86'ed for the same kind of anti-social forum behavior- making violent threats.