So, what happens if Trump wins Nov5th

[dkovic77]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1804670467229241352

I wonder how he will straighten it all out? And he doesn’t need folks to vote in four years. Hmmmm…

Wait.. he didn’t mean… he didn’t say…. We just hate on him…

 

[Lazaran]

What are you talking about? This is the CNN reference in your Boston Herald article: The lawfare is so dubious that even CNN is now crying foul and defending Trump. That’s a low point.

There is no follow up. If I missed something else let me know. Otherwise, an opinion piece is still just an opinion piece

And the schmuck giving the opinion in the article that ineedhelp1 cited admitted he wasn’t in the courtroom, so he didn’t have a full picture of how the prosecution presented their case.



Interestingly, the schmuck in the article ineedhelp1 cited found no fault in Judge Merchan’s handling of the trial, but again, admitted that he wasn’t in the courtroom, and he didn’t hear Judge Merchan’s jury instructions, so he couldn’t draw a firm conclusion on the judge’s performance.



So basically: ineedhelp1 wants everyone to accept the SECONDHAND OPINION of someone, as definitive proof / evidence of "something".



ineedhelp1

 

[bejjinks]

And yet the Republican Party has never been more united. IMHO

Bwa ha ha ha ha. Conservatives keep turning on each other. MTG slapped Boebert and keeps moving to get rid of every Republican speaker of the house. You call Pence and any of the good conservatives rinos. United? Are you kidding?

 

[bejjinks]

Democrats defend and support Biden to a fault.

I already told you, Biden will not go down as the greatest president in history. We know he has faults.

Are you willing to admit Trump has faults?

 

[dkovic77]

And yet the Republican Party has never been more united. IMHO

United by delusion…but yeah…

United by not getting anything accomplished.

United by just blaming all their faults on someone else.

But look, you didn’t seem to have a problem with the platform… so good for you.

DING late night fries are up!

 

[bejjinks]

Is the democrat party rallying around Biden? The answer is yes. Both parties have their extremes

No we are rallying against Trump. We don't care about Biden as long as we stop Trump.

 

[bejjinks]

This thread is depressing. So much anger and hate for fellow Americans. We're all on the same team, people. These are your neighbors, your friends, your family.

If your brother held a gun to your head, would you open your arms and give him a hug?

 

[icanhelp1]

And the schmuck giving the opinion in the article that ineedhelp1 cited admitted he wasn’t in the courtroom, so he didn’t have a full picture of how the prosecution presented their case.



Interestingly, the schmuck in the article ineedhelp1 cited found no fault in Judge Merchan’s handling of the trial, but again, admitted that he wasn’t in the courtroom, and he didn’t hear Judge Merchan’s jury instructions, so he couldn’t draw a firm conclusion on the judge’s performance.



So basically: ineedhelp1 wants everyone to accept the SECONDHAND OPINION of someone, as definitive proof / evidence of "something".



ineedhelp1

I sourced other opinions like CNN as part of a mosaic of legal opinions across the spectrum.

This video discusses the trial and demonstrates to a lay person how the trial was unfair, unconstitutional in that due process was violated, Merchan steered the jury to a conviction, failure to properly instruct the jury as to campaign finance law, explained reversible errors and how NY law is questionable as to its constitutionality especially when it came to the prosecution going last during closing arguments.

I’m sure if it were Biden in the hot seat you would agree with the panel’s assessment.

Hillary actually did violate campaign finance laws in NY but mums the word.

In retrospect;

 

[dkovic77]

I sourced other opinions like CNN as part of a mosaic of legal opinions across the spectrum.

This video discusses the trial and demonstrates to a lay person how the trial was unfair, unconstitutional in that due process was violated, Merchan steered the jury to a conviction, failure to properly instruct the jury as to campaign finance law, explained reversible errors and how NY law is questionable as to its constitutionality especially when it came to the prosecution going last during closing arguments.

I’m sure if it were Biden in the hot seat you would agree with the panel’s assessment.

Hillary actually did violate campaign finance laws in NY but mums the word.

Stop watching the overly biased garbage and watch some folks who are objective.

But you won’t, Drop those hash browns.

 

[YDB95]

I sourced other opinions like CNN as part of a mosaic of legal opinions across the spectrum.

This video discusses the trial and demonstrates to a lay person how the trial was unfair, unconstitutional in that due process was violated, Merchan steered the jury to a conviction, failure to properly instruct the jury as to campaign finance law, explained reversible errors and how NY law is questionable as to its constitutionality especially when it came to the prosecution going last during closing arguments.

I’m sure if it were Biden in the hot seat you would agree with the panel’s assessment.

Hillary actually did violate campaign finance laws in NY but mums the word.

In retrospect;

Trump's lawyers are welcome to argue all those things on appeal. But if you know any lawyers yourself, you might want to run this by them and see if they buy any of it. I doubt they will.

 

[icanhelp1]

Trump's lawyers are welcome to argue all those things on appeal. But if you know any lawyers yourself, you might want to run this by them and see if they buy any of it. I doubt they will.

They will appeal, however, the reversible errors, due process violations, restricting expert testimony by someone who could clarify campaign finance laws for the jury, a judge that allowed irrelevant, salacious and prejudicial testimony with little to no probative value, steered the jury down a path that a conviction by an uninformed and confused jury could only lead to an incorrect verdict. And now democrats can use what they hoped for, a conviction on false pretense that would provide campaign slogans that "Trump is a convicted felon" and possible sentencing which will also interfere with the election process. James, Merchan, Bragg, Engoron should be disbarred for judicial misfeasance and judicial misconduct; Bias or the appearance of bias, impropriety or the appearance of impropriety, abuse of authority, failing to disclose a conflict of interest and improper communication about a case. imho

 

[Lazaran]

imho

ineedhelp1

 

[Fuzzy1975]

They will appeal, however, the reversible errors, due process violations, restricting expert testimony by someone who could clarify campaign finance laws for the jury, a judge that allowed irrelevant, salacious and prejudicial testimony with little to no probative value, steered the jury down a path that a conviction by an uninformed and confused jury could only lead to an incorrect verdict. And now democrats can use what they hoped for, a conviction on false pretense that would provide campaign slogans that "Trump is a convicted felon" and possible sentencing which will also interfere with the election process. James, Merchan, Bragg, Engoron should be disbarred for judicial misfeasance and judicial misconduct; Bias or the appearance of bias, impropriety or the appearance of impropriety, abuse of authority, failing to disclose a conflict of interest and improper communication about a case. imho

lol good luck in your expectations...

 

[dkovic77]

They will appeal, however, the reversible errors, due process violations, restricting expert testimony by someone who could clarify campaign finance laws for the jury, a judge that allowed irrelevant, salacious and prejudicial testimony with little to no probative value, steered the jury down a path that a conviction by an uninformed and confused jury could only lead to an incorrect verdict. And now democrats can use what they hoped for, a conviction on false pretense that would provide campaign slogans that "Trump is a convicted felon" and possible sentencing which will also interfere with the election process. James, Merchan, Bragg, Engoron should be disbarred for judicial misfeasance and judicial misconduct; Bias or the appearance of bias, impropriety or the appearance of impropriety, abuse of authority, failing to disclose a conflict of interest and improper communication about a case. imho

Nothing humble about you… but you want that in an expert fry guy. Someone who takes great pride in their work, turns down a promotion to drive thru.

And if your guy wasn’t such a life long shit show… he could afford actual lawyers instead of these who can’t seem to make appropriate motions in court. But since good lawyers know they aren’t getting paid, why would they stick their neck out for him??

Karma is tough!

 

[jomar]

What are you talking about? This is the CNN reference in your Boston Herald article: The lawfare is so dubious that even CNN is now crying foul and defending Trump. That’s a low point.

There is no follow up. If I missed something else let me know. Otherwise, an opinion piece is still just an opinion piece

https://www.bostonherald.com/2024/06/22/backer-trumps-conviction-an-absurd-double-standard/

Ah, I guess you meant Honig’s, say it with me, OPINION

For the most part democrats don’t break ranks. Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney, Lizzy and a whole host of other republicans deserve to be classified as RINOs.

Interesting that these days moderate conservatives “deserve to be classified as RINOS.” Though if you recall, Liz Cheney, who rightly said the emperor had no clothes, voted with trump something like 97% of the time

 

[HisArpy]

They will appeal, however, the reversible errors, due process violations, restricting expert testimony by someone who could clarify campaign finance laws for the jury, a judge that allowed irrelevant, salacious and prejudicial testimony with little to no probative value, steered the jury down a path that a conviction by an uninformed and confused jury could only lead to an incorrect verdict. And now democrats can use what they hoped for, a conviction on false pretense that would provide campaign slogans that "Trump is a convicted felon" and possible sentencing which will also interfere with the election process. James, Merchan, Bragg, Engoron should be disbarred for judicial misfeasance and judicial misconduct; Bias or the appearance of bias, impropriety or the appearance of impropriety, abuse of authority, failing to disclose a conflict of interest and improper communication about a case. imho

So many people, all seemingly focused on the same desired outcome, acting together to make it happen.

I'm sure there's a word for that kind of thing...

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

So many people, all seemingly focused on the same desired outcome, acting together to make it happen.

I'm sure there's a word for that kind of thing...

That word is democracy.

 

[adrina]

 

[bejjinks]

That word is democracy.

No, democracy is when different people with different goals come together to agree to a process (elections), not a desired outcome.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

No, democracy is when different people with different goals come together to agree to a process (elections), not a desired outcome.

What you described is what Trump is opposed to.

 

[DeluxAuto]

I wonder how he will straighten it all out?

He will use the skills he employed with straightening out the border wall and repealing and replacing Obamacare.

 

[icanhelp1]

No, democracy is when different people with different goals come together to agree to a process (elections), not a desired outcome.

And yet only democrats pretending to protect and defend democracy by eliminating a leading candidate from their ballots, attempting to deny millions of Americans their constitutional right to choose, can justify their perverted vision of democracy.

 

[adrina]

And yet only democrats pretending to protect and defend democracy by eliminating a leading candidate from their ballots, attempting to deny millions of Americans their constitutional right to choose, can justify their perverted vision of democracy.

Hi traitor!

We know you like and support Trump because he reflects your values. You agree with and support cheating on your spouse, having sex with porn stars, paying off porn stars to sway elections, falsifying financial records, making fun of the disabled, calling our veterans and soldiers "suckers and losers" (ironic), incessant whining and making inappropriate comments about girls. Among so many other things.

Have a great day traitor!

 

[bejjinks]

What you described is what Trump is opposed to.

You said it. Trump is opposed to letting anyone vote except those who vote for Trump.

 

[icanhelp1]

Hi traitor!

We know you like and support Trump because he reflects your values. You agree with and support cheating on your spouse, having sex with porn stars, paying off porn stars to sway elections, falsifying financial records, making fun of the disabled, calling our veterans and soldiers "suckers and losers" (ironic), incessant whining and making inappropriate comments about girls. Among so many other things.

Have a great day traitor!

You deserve your own bobblehead.

FYI;
“Judge Judy” Sheindlin is calling Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s (D) hush money case against former President Trump “nonsense.”

“You gotta twist yourself into a pretzel to figure out what the crime was. [Bragg] doesn’t like him — New York City didn’t like him for a while,” Sheindlin said of Trump in a “Who’s Talking to Chris Wallace?” interview streaming Friday on Max.