LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

No more complaints

So why has the Trump-appointed District Court Judge with zero previous experience as a judge quashed Trump's trial although it was widely anticipated a slam-dunk?
 
More lawfare from the left. A 1000 complaints in a week against Judge Cannon. A concerted effort by the "New Confederacy" to cancel Trump's due process rights just like their ancestors who ran the first Confederacy tried to conspire against the 14th Amendment and the due process rights it afforded to black Americans in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Lawfare in those days was called Jim Crow.
 
Last edited:
HisArpy said:
It seems as if the 11th circuit has had enough.

https://redstate.com/smoosieq/2024/...ated-complaints-against-judge-cannon-n2175020


Bad news for the whining and crying Lefties.
Click to expand...
As HisArpy has repeatedly shown us, members of the bar are especially prickly when it comes to criticism from "outsiders", i.e. common folk not in the club. They have their own notions of what is right and proper and bristle that people don't understand the nuances of the American court system.

Virtually all of America realizes that Federal judge Aileen Cannon is out of her depth here in this case, even members of the bar are shaking their head publicly at the "rookie mistakes" she has purportedly made. This must be especially stressful for Judge Cannon, so she plods along now seemingly scared of her own shadow.

This does not mean she's not politically partisan. She has her "eye on the prize" long term: If Trump ascends to the White House again, she knows she's on the short list to replace Sotomaior.
 
HisArpy said:
It seems as if the 11th circuit has had enough.

https://redstate.com/smoosieq/2024/...ated-complaints-against-judge-cannon-n2175020


Bad news for the whining and crying Lefties.
Click to expand...
Some of the wording in these articles and postings are interesting. The theme of "pro-Trump" is up front and repeated ad nauseam in those written by the 'woke' and even creep into those articles written by conservatives.

Having read many of the filings, and most importantly those that are contributing to the complaints, Cannon is NOT pro-Trump as much as she is NOT allowing the prosecution to shortcut the law or the rules of the court which, of course, has the prosecution and their supporters throwing a hissy fit.
 
RobDownSouth said:
As HisArpy has repeatedly shown us, members of the bar are especially prickly when it comes to criticism from "outsiders", i.e. common folk not in the club. They have their own notions of what is right and proper and bristle that people don't understand the nuances of the American court system.

Virtually all of America realizes that Federal judge Aileen Cannon is out of her depth here in this case, even members of the bar are shaking their head publicly at the "rookie mistakes" she has purportedly made. This must be especially stressful for Judge Cannon, so she plods along now seemingly scared of her own shadow.

This does not mean she's not politically partisan. She has her "eye on the prize" long term: If Trump ascends to the White House again, she knows she's on the short list to replace Sotomaior.
Click to expand...
The National Lawyers Guild isn't "the bar."
 
Chobham said:
Some of the wording in these articles and postings are interesting. The theme of "pro-Trump" is up front and repeated ad nauseam in those written by the 'woke' and even creep into those articles written by conservatives.

Having read many of the filings, and most importantly those that are contributing to the complaints, Cannon is NOT pro-Trump as much as she is NOT allowing the prosecution to shortcut the law or the rules of the court which, of course, has the prosecution and their supporters throwing a hissy fit.
Click to expand...
It's obvious she isn't pro-Communist either. Hence Jack Smith's dismay.
 
Chobham said:
Some of the wording in these articles and postings are interesting. The theme of "pro-Trump" is up front and repeated ad nauseam in those written by the 'woke' and even creep into those articles written by conservatives.

Having read many of the filings, and most importantly those that are contributing to the complaints, Cannon is NOT pro-Trump as much as she is NOT allowing the prosecution to shortcut the law or the rules of the court which, of course, has the prosecution and their supporters throwing a hissy fit.
Click to expand...


An interesting aspect is that the trial judge is required by law to give full deference to the accused. So far Cannon has done so but that's what's outraging the Left, she's obeying and following the law rather than slanting it against the accused.

Apparently the Left doesn't like it when they can't abuse the system. As the linked article shows along with the replies in this thread from the usual suspects.
 
Chobham said:
Some of the wording in these articles and postings are interesting. The theme of "pro-Trump" is up front and repeated ad nauseam in those written by the 'woke' and even creep into those articles written by conservatives.

Having read many of the filings, and most importantly those that are contributing to the complaints, Cannon is NOT pro-Trump as much as she is NOT allowing the prosecution to shortcut the law or the rules of the court which, of course, has the prosecution and their supporters throwing a hissy fit.
Click to expand...
She is 100% pro trump, are you crazy?
 
HisArpy said:
An interesting aspect is that the trial judge is required by law to give full deference to the accused. So far Cannon has done so but that's what's outraging the Left, she's obeying and following the law rather than slanting it against the accused.

Apparently the Left doesn't like it when they can't abuse the system. As the linked article shows along with the replies in this thread from the usual suspects.
Click to expand...
Like true Democrats, they hate due process of law for their opponents.
 
If you think the Totalitarianists are squealing now, wait until the SCOTUS rulings start dropping. I am for real going to pick up some popcorn so I can just sit back and watch.
 
It has been obvious that the "Documents" case which is subject to Cannon is the most serious that Trump faces with the clearest evidence against him. If Trump wins the election it will never proceed. If he loses it will still take a very very long time.

Cannon, like Merchan in New York is Hispanic, and like him was born in Colombia, no prizes for guessing Trumps favourite Colombian. A comparison of their Wiki Bios is interesting. She has been more involved politically than him

Another interesting prospect- Merchan is the judge for Steve Bannon's trial in September
 
Last edited:
HisArpy said:
An interesting aspect is that the trial judge is required by law to give full deference to the accused. So far Cannon has done so but that's what's outraging the Left, she's obeying and following the law rather than slanting it against the accused.

Apparently the Left doesn't like it when they can't abuse the system. As the linked article shows along with the replies in this thread from the usual suspects.
Click to expand...

The left DEMANDS that the system not be abused and go out of our way to hamstring ourselves so no rational argument can be made that we have cheated. Cannon is obviously working for Trump and despite that no serious attacks have been made against the judge which should have been done from day one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rightguide
Court of Appeals Tosses Boasberg Contempt Order
Replies
20
Views
241
Rightguide
Rightguide
Rightguide
Big Court Win for Trump As Judge Dismisses USAID Case on Jurisdictional Grounds
Replies
6
Views
135
Bray123
B
Rightguide
Appeals Court Allows Trump to End Union Bargaining for Some Federal Workers
Replies
10
Views
135
dingdongditchding
D
Rightguide
Obama's Dream Of Net Neutrality Are Dead And Over
Replies
4
Views
199
DeluxAuto
DeluxAuto
Rightguide
Our poor Communities Are Eating Themselves
6 7 8
Replies
197
Views
963
dmallord
dmallord
Back
Top