Talk....
Logistics
Sure he did....*chuckles*
Anyone can see the build up. It was going on while Trump was President....
Again Talk, the only action was Putin building up his logistics.
I'm not disputing the facts, I want you to show me some.....
Kellyann's "alternative facts" aren't real councillor.......
Putin didn't wait four years. It took over 6 years to gather up the required ( or so Putin thought) forces and and equipment to run a successful 3 day military operation to take control of Ukraine.
This response?
Nah, my ass cheeks are fine, trying to educate idiots such as yourself isn't embarrassing, it's entertaining....
lol. No, I’ve never said the TCJA was a problem or that Americans are under taxed. Thanks for taking the time to dig through my posts going all the way back to 2019 and reposting the one where I noted that tax receipts were actually up 3.8% in the first year of the TCJA.
Tax revenue's vary from year to year. They are not static. The point was, even you understand you can't cut revenue, without cutting spending, and expect to ballance.lol. No, I’ve never said the TCJA was a problem or that Americans are under taxed. Thanks for taking the time to dig through my posts going all the way back to 2019 and reposting the one where I noted that tax receipts were actually up 3.8% in the first year of the TCJA.
The national debt will rise under Biden, even if Biden did makes cuts, just on the interest alone on the Debt Trump added. If you want to chase the tail on this, we need to go back to Reagan, or even further...Clinton is the only President to actual have not added to the National debt, in one of his 8 years....
Thanks for once again showing tax cuts without a source of revenue to offset them drives up the debt.
I don't know what the Democrats will do. I just know what Trump DID.
Thanks for admitting you're in a bad place debt wise. Praising a tax cut that only benefits you and others in this current fiscal period but will cause vast harm down the road is exactly what I stated at the outset.
I don't care if they stay, or go. I'm just pointing out, all you care about is you and the here and now. Fuck your children and grandchildren....even poor Biden's Navy....
Sounds like you don’t think spending drives up debt. Or you simply don’t care.
The real question is, do you care about the National Debt. So far I get the feeling the answer is no.
Yes I care about it, but nobody in DC does so there’s not much point in complaining about it. Both parties spend too much. The CARES Act passed under the Trump administration and $4.7 trillion in new spending has been added during the Biden Administration. I may have missed your criticism of all the big spending packages that have been sailing through Congress.
No you don't, you might say you do, but if you really did, you wouldn't have cheered on Trump's tax cuts...
In case you missed it, I'm not American. I'm just pointing out your personal selfishness. The same kind most Baby Boomers have shown through their entire existence.
Yes, us American taxpayers are very selfish. We don’t let our politicians spend nearly enough of of our money.
Yes you are. Nice of you to start admitting it. I'm sure your grandchildren will remember you for it.
If I remember correctly shortly after the Trump tax cuts revenue increased.
Absolutely. Our grandchildren will no doubt appreciate the assets my wife and I are able to leave for them when we’re gone. Their parents are raising them to recognize the virtues of small government.
Yes I'm so sure they will appreciate no SS or Medicare....very much Gramps!!
Small Government has nothing to do with fiscal responsibility.
Spending more than you take in is fiscally irresponsible. Tax revenues have held consistently around 17% of GDP for five decades. The government’s insatiable appetite to spend more keeps rising.
You don’t understand how Medicare and SS is financed. It’s funded through payroll taxes on employers and employees, not through income taxes. There have been no cuts to Medicare and SS taxes. In fact the amount of each employee’s paycheck that’s subject to these taxes has risen and will keep rising due to changing demographics. Boomers like me comprise a greater proportion of the population who are collecting on these programs. People still working have to pay more and work longer to keep the programs afloat.
Just like cutting revenue without reducing expenditure is irresponsible. So which one of those two governing errors were we going on about? Oh right Trump's tax cut.
US population 1970 204 Million. US population in 2020 330 Million. US GDP in 1970 1,073,000. US GDP in 2020 21,000,000
Do you have to work to receive Medicare? ( Yes you do need to have worked to receive SS)
Yes it does. Smaller government = less spending
https://www.heritage.org/taxes/commentary/the-numbers-are-trumps-tax-cuts-paid
Except revenue was not cut. It is trending toward 17.9% of GDP, slightly higher than the 50 year historical average. Spending on the other hand, is trending towards 24% of GDP, up from its 21% historical average.
No it doesn't. A government's spending has nothing to do with size or number of programs it offers. You can have 1 million programs and spend 1 dollar of funding on each, or 1 program and spend 10 million dollars of funding on that program.
You ever going to answer this question????
