Wonderer67
Optimistic nihilist
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2020
- Posts
- 15,788
Thanks Angeline!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
luckily I write the shit for me and not for you.. I wasnt aware this was a discussion board. Please leave your comments for someone who would appreciate them, but that isnt me. All you have done is make me want to not come here at all.
Often when I write, I write with the understanding, interpretation will be the business of the reader. Mine is to let it loose. In this way a poem once released takes on a life all of its own. When lucky, I get to hear about how ‘they’ are doing.I get what you're saying and respect that people know their own poems and what they want them to do. However my experience has been that readers often get something very different from the read than the writer intended. And that's fine. But, for me, any feedback that results in me (the writer) having to say what was intended with the words I chose is a sign that maybe something isn't working for readers. And if anyone besides the writer is going to see the poem that's important. Maybe I'm wrong: I'm giving critique, not criticism but, like I said, food for thought.![]()
Right. I agree. However if I mention that I don't understand something in a poem and the poet says something like "what it's supposed to mean is ..." I think why not revise it so readers have a better chance of understanding what you intended? If I can clarify my meaning I want to do that. I recognize that readers bring their own experiences to a read and that colors interpretation, but I still want to do my best to make my intended meaning clear.Often when I write, I write with the understanding, interpretation will be the business of the reader. Mine is to let it loose. In this way a poem once released takes on a life all of its own. When lucky, I get to hear about how ‘they’ are doing.
You do so marvelously make a good point.Right. I agree. However if I mention that I don't understand something in a poem and the poet says something like "what it's supposed to mean is ..." I think why not revise it so readers have a better chance of understanding what you intended? If I can clarify my meaning I want to do that. I recognize that readers bring their own experiences to a read and that colors interpretation, but I still want to do my best to make my intended meaning clear.![]()
I read poems I love over and over. It's like rereading my favorite novels or rewatching films I love. I always find something new to consider. And I memorize poem endings, sometimes even whole poems, that I love. Do you? (And by *you* I mean anyone reading this who cares to respond!)As we know. There are many ways to end a poem. Sometimes, I feel a great poem ending is a frontier begging a rereading.
You do so marvellously make a good point
In my dreams, I write my poems between the lines and hope like f_ck the reader finds them.I write my words in lines of two
and twine them tight 'bout sugarcane
I liked the way this poem takes the man’s hands ‘lightly’ to tell on him. There is so much packed into that thought that I feel mentally impregnated eww Angeline stop itParadise
Sometimes
it's the way you take
my hand or wrap an arm
about my waist, fingers resting
lightly on my hip, thumb sliding
along its curve, all statements
to signify I own her.
I want nothing
more than to be yours,
to share these gestures,
the language of intimacy,
that bind us in desire.
Later when you move in me,
both of us quaking with pleasure,
eyes aglow, we know
this wordless message,
the silent exchange of lust
and love.
As you likely know, no one here on the forum is involved with the submissions process, so all we can do on this end is conjecture and suggest possible fixes. I assume your poem is not being rejected for failing to meet Literotica's submissions guidelines and only for editorial issues. If you feel your poem is correct (i.e., what you intended), you can resubmit it with a note explaining that the "errors" they're flagging are meant to be there. That should resolve the issue.A RANT
My poem, titled Lust in Comic Relief keeps getting sent back by those arse vanilla Lit poetry guardians for ‘spelling mistakes.’ GRRRRRRR Why can’t they get it, mangling words, inarticulate sounds ARE legit poetical devices???
GRRRRRR and SOS Help!
How the FREAK do I get through to these Barsetards??
Desperately seeking Editors please (nobody wants to edit poetry!)
Direction welcome![]()
Doh! gulp, oh yeah that box…As you likely know, no one here on the forum is involved with the submissions process, so all we can do on this end is conjecture and suggest possible fixes. I assume your poem is not being rejected for failing to meet Literotica's submissions guidelines and only for editorial issues. If you feel your poem is correct (i.e., what you intended), you can resubmit it with a note explaining that the "errors" they're flagging are meant to be there. That should resolve the issue.
I haven't submitted any poems for years, but pretty sure there's still a box on the submission form where you can add notes, special instructions, etc. if I'm wrong, someone more up to date on the process can correct me...and help you out!
I did try that to see if I could re do it, but.. U stumped me.The alliteration in the last line has me wondering what if you did that with the other lines.... the 1st with the L, the 2nd with the U and so on.
May I try? This will drive me nuts if I don'tI did try that to see if I could re do it, but.. U stumped me.
Now you try.I may have gone for 'sighs'.
I'm still not convinced the 'U' works!
But you did better than I managed!
It's all a matter of taste, isn't it? For me, too much alliteration can make a poem, especially a short poem, seem like it's trying too hard to be "poetic." I prefer your original version: I think it works better with just the one alliterated line. And if "unraveled" feels wrong to you, maybe "undone" would work? Just my opinion (and taste) of course.I may have gone for 'sighs'.
I'm still not convinced the 'U' works!
But you did better than I managed!
I actually agree... I just wanted to see it if it was played with a bit....It's all a matter of taste, isn't it? For me, too much alliteration can make a poem, especially a short poem, seem like it's trying too hard to be "poetic." I prefer your original version: I think it works better with just the one alliterated line. And if "unraveled" feels wrong to you, maybe "undone" would work? Just my opinion (and taste) of course.
Otoh there's nothing wrong with playing around with the tools of poetry like alliteration to see what you get.
My years here have taught me that if I ask five poets how I might strengthen my poem (or line or even word), I'll likely get five different, mostly conflicting opinions!
![]()
Got it. Sometimes one does want a lot of alliteration, like in a humorous poem or one that's using alliteration for some other, specific effect. Also it can be good practice imo to try writing poetry where every word starts with the same letter. That doesn't produce especially good poetry lol but it's a good exercise, one that gets you thinking hard about word choices.I actually agree... I just wanted to see it if it was played with a bit....
Wait, that sounded way less dirty in my head.
That's also why I was happy for @JaySecrets to play around with it. He may have given me inspiration for a different directionGot it. Sometimes one does want a lot of alliteration, like in a humorous poem or one that's using alliteration for some other, specific effect. Also it can be good practice imo to try writing poetry where every word starts with the same letter. That doesn't produce especially good poetry lol but it's a good exercise, one that gets you thinking hard about word choices.![]()