Wat's Guns-N-Stuff Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's the problem, their "group" is a LOT smaller than they think it is.


I demonstrated that a bunch of pages back and pointed out the appropriate use of the term Bolshevik as Lenin intended. We're the minority, but if we refer to ourselves as Majority Men for long enough . . . .


67% of 53% is 35% (more or less), which leaves 65% who had a different idea, and a big chunk of those have given up on their chickenshit system.
 
Here's the problem, their "group" is a LOT smaller than they think it is.
Is it now? Shall we put America’s groupthink to a vote?

STFU, buy your ammo, celebrate the next mass shooting, and be happy that there’s enough uncaring politicians ignorant to their constituents.

AP-NORC poll: Most in US say they want stricter gun laws​

https://apnews.com/article/gun-violence-covid-health-chicago-c912ecc5619e925c5ea7447d36808715

Fox News poll finds voters overwhelmingly want restrictions on guns​

https://www.axios.com/2023/04/28/fox-news-poll-voters-want-gun-control

Americans’ dissatisfaction with gun laws at new high: Gallup poll​

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...on-with-gun-laws-at-new-high-gallup-poll/amp/
 
Here's the problem, their "group" is a LOT smaller than they think it is.
^^^Spoken like a diehard brainwashed cult follower.

You have no idea how hard the extreme right-wing is going to get whacked in the coming election cycles, because of your limited exposure to real world data. That's always been the blind spot of any cult phenomenon.
 
Scary true, really. Think: War on Drugs. Heroin is illegal. So we can't get it.


Ever known a junkie???


What do those st000pid cunts think that they can ban and make it stick? Because Prohibition worked so fucking well . . . .
No law is 100% effective. The point of laws is to reduce the number of people committing the offense, even though we can’t eradicate it entirely. Sure, if we make private ownership of firearms illegal, a few scofflaws will hang on to them, but most people will decide having a gun around isn’t worth the expense or the risk.
 
No law is 100% effective. The point of laws is to reduce the number of people committing the offense, even though we can’t eradicate it entirely. Sure, if we make private ownership of firearms illegal, a few scofflaws will hang on to them, but most people will decide having a gun around isn’t worth the expense or the risk.

Thank you for your participation 🏆
 
No law is 100% effective.
Yet when I said almost the same identical thing you said to me then we should eliminate all laws. You can't even keep track of your own side of the argument. Nice try, but no points awarded.

The simple fact is when you write laws only those who 100% believe that the government is always right follow all of them. Those that disagree will not follow the laws. Hence rioting, looting, violence in the streets, take over of private property, attacking public buildings, vandalism, and arson, which have laws making them all illegal were ignored by radicals seeking a violent overthrow of a system they regard as corrupt and discriminatory. The problem with people like you is you agree with violating the law when it serves your purpose, but oppose opposition to any law when it attacks your precious sensibilities. Which makes you a hypocrite.
 
Yet when I said almost the same identical thing you said to me then we should eliminate all laws. You can't even keep track of your own side of the argument. Nice try, but no points awarded.

The simple fact is when you write laws only those who 100% believe that the government is always right follow all of them. Those that disagree will not follow the laws. Hence rioting, looting, violence in the streets, take over of private property, attacking public buildings, vandalism, and arson, which have laws making them all illegal were ignored by radicals seeking a violent overthrow of a system they regard as corrupt and discriminatory. The problem with people like you is you agree with violating the law when it serves your purpose, but oppose opposition to any law when it attacks your precious sensibilities. Which makes you a hypocrite.
GFY
 
Yet when I said almost the same identical thing you said to me then we should eliminate all laws. You can't even keep track of your own side of the argument. Nice try, but no points awarded.

The simple fact is when you write laws only those who 100% believe that the government is always right follow all of them. Those that disagree will not follow the laws. Hence rioting, looting, violence in the streets, take over of private property, attacking public buildings, vandalism, and arson, which have laws making them all illegal were ignored by radicals seeking a violent overthrow of a system they regard as corrupt and discriminatory. The problem with people like you is you agree with violating the law when it serves your purpose, but oppose opposition to any law when it attacks your precious sensibilities. Which makes you a hypocrite.
I believe I said something like “if laws don’t affect human behavior, then why have any laws?”

I’ve never advocated for eliminating all laws. Stronger gun laws would lead to fewer guns in the hands of criminals, as well as fewer gun deaths from law-abiding people being careless.

America’s permissive attitude toward firearms is literally getting us killed.
 
Glad to see you are still the asshole you always try to pretend you aren't.

Honestly, what you think about me or say to me is a waste of your time. You are totally fucking meaningless to me and many others here on this board. You are nothing more than a self absorbed attention seeker. That's the only reason you comment here.
 
I believe I said something like “if laws don’t affect human behavior, then why have any laws?”

I’ve never advocated for eliminating all laws. Stronger gun laws would lead to fewer guns in the hands of criminals, as well as fewer gun deaths from law-abiding people being careless.

America’s permissive attitude toward firearms is literally getting us killed.
If your ilk had been in charge in the 1700's we would still be a British Colony. The Brits wanted to disarm the colonists because they new a revolution was coming. Yeah guess what the colonists told them...FUCK OFF, you'll not get our guns. The problem is CRIMINALS and the MENTALLY ILL. Not law abiding citizens like me that in total own an estimated 300,000,000 guns and billions if not trillions of rounds of ammunition. If we were the problem you'd know.

You may not have been advocating for eliminating laws but you obviously sided with those wishing to defund the police. Riddle me this...If you defund the police who will enforce any of your laws, let alone new ones?
 
Last edited:
If your ilk had been in charge in the 1700's we would still be a British Colony. The Brits wanted to disarm the colonists because they new a revolution was coming. Yeah guess what the colonists told them...FUCK OFF, you'll not get our guns.
You need to get a lesson in history. The British didn't want/nor try to disarm the British colonist. But hey, you believe what you wish. That kind of explains why you ran over under Wat's skirt.
 
Go ahead and defund police. The militia (yes, there really still is one) will take up the slack. And I think we can wager to win that no innocents will get killed.
 
.

America’s permissive attitude toward firearms is literally getting us killed.
America's political toleration of an uneducated, violent, undisciplined, and barbarous demographic is getting people killed. It has nothing to do with the vast majority of the law-abiding population who are armed with them.

The reported number of 13,640 gun deaths includes both homicides and suicides. It encompasses all fatalities related to firearms, regardless of the intent behind the use of the weapon.

Out of the 13,640 gun deaths reported in the United States, 8,010 were classified as actual murders.

In the United States, approximately 1,630 murders were committed using knives or cutting instruments in the year 20221

Heart disease, for instance, results in significantly more deaths than homicides, with a rate of 173.8 deaths per 100,000 population compared to 6.3 homicides per 100,0001.

Out of the 8,010 gun deaths reported in the United States, 364 were attributed to rifles in the year 20191. Rifles include various types of long guns, including AR-15-style semi-automatic rifles that have been involved in several deadly mass shootings over the past decade.
 
America's political toleration of an uneducated, violent, undisciplined, and barbarous demographic is getting people killed. It has nothing to do with the vast majority of the law-abiding population who are armed with them.

The reported number of 13,640 gun deaths includes both homicides and suicides. It encompasses all fatalities related to firearms, regardless of the intent behind the use of the weapon.

Out of the 13,640 gun deaths reported in the United States, 8,010 were classified as actual murders.

In the United States, approximately 1,630 murders were committed using knives or cutting instruments in the year 20221

Heart disease, for instance, results in significantly more deaths than homicides, with a rate of 173.8 deaths per 100,000 population compared to 6.3 homicides per 100,0001.

Out of the 8,010 gun deaths reported in the United States, 364 were attributed to rifles in the year 20191. Rifles include various types of long guns, including AR-15-style semi-automatic rifles that have been involved in several deadly mass shootings over the past decade.
How come you ran from this statistic when I posted before? I used it when you wanted a citation to how many deaths were by handguns vs rifles. Now you want to use it to back up your point....fucking hypocrite
 
Glad to see you are still the asshole you always try to pretend you aren't.

Honestly, what you think about me or say to me is a waste of your time. You are totally fucking meaningless to me and many others here on this board. You are nothing more than a self absorbed attention seeker. That's the only reason you comment here.
Your first post hinted at subtle whiffs of racism. The second response is just a deflection. If you wanna talk about defunding the police, then make us a thread. What you won’t do is put forward reasonable, common sense gun reform suggestions. We are all tired of the dick stroking, white male privileged reasons you cling onto for gun ownership. Grow up. Be man and really start protecting your loved ones.
 
If your ilk had been in charge in the 1700's we would still be a British Colony. The Brits wanted to disarm the colonists because they new a revolution was coming. Yeah guess what the colonists told them...FUCK OFF, you'll not get our guns.
Look at you. Throwing a tantrum. I do not know if you are a racist, but you are quite comfortable with racist dog whistling. It’s always funny how Americans complain about Black Lives Matter protesting, and then turn to the American Revolution. The catalyst of it being the Boston tea party which enshrined for the makers right of citizens to protest. But let’s be honest, what you really mean is protest for thee and not for me.

I know you’re mad. Now is the perfect time to tell me about your one black friend.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top