$83.3 million reasons why?

[Bray123]

And Trump is cash poor. It's all tied up in overleveraged and undertaxed properties.

And he also has the fraud trial to cover if he loses.

Stand by for the Al Capone prosecution lining up right now.

 

[dmallord]

And Trump is cash poor. It's all tied up in properties.

And he also has the fraud trial to cover if he loses.

Yesterday, in an interview with a Trump biographer, a fellow with thirty years of experience dealing with him said he may be in the situation you described: 'cash poor.'

Apparently, Trump declared ten years ago he was worth 10B. Later 5B. At one point, some audits indicated he was between 1B and 1.5 B when researching data for the biography. During the trial testimony, Trump declared he had 400M in cash reserves.

The author had a little smirk as he finished his interview, remarking that no one knows Trump's estimated value because he claims it is whatever he needs it to be at the moment he reveals his estimated net worth.

 

[dkovic77]

Such a joke. A woman who had no evidence, doesn’t remember when it allegedly happened - not even the year, talked on live TV about how rape was a fantasy, calls her cats vagina and tits and is a complete looney toon. That she was allowed to smear Trump who wasn’t allowed to produce any defense. Simply she said something happened at some point in the past and that was enough. There is no justice in America.

Hunter!!!

Wait, like that?

 

[Sparky74]

Hunter!!!

Wait, like that?

No Justice in America that's such a Laugh, a Masoganistic Nut Job is caught out I would say that is Definitely Justice.

 

[dkovic77]

Evidence that supported Trump's defense was not not allowed in court. 83 million is laughable and will be overturned in a court of appeal.

All that “evidence” of voter fraud was in the same pile right?

Courts don’t like the evidence drawn in crayon and finger paint.

Maybe if he paid his lawyers and didn’t sabotage his own case/position he could get competent lawyers who know what evidence is admissible. But he would have to be in his right mind and we know he isn’t.

 

[Bray123]

Just putting it out there, maybe if his 'only the best' lawyer had entered the evidence into the trial in the time-honored fashion, it might have been considered.

But it turns out that an appeal is unlikely because his lawyer agreed without objection to all the the prosecution evidence and kept her rebuttals for the courtroom steps.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

She couldn’t confirm what year. She’s a nut case, even her friend called her a nutcase in a word.

Trump’s already been found guilty of assaulting and defaming her.

 

[icanhelp1]

It was not admitted for a reason. It was not allowed because it did not relate to the current case. It might have been in the first one, but Trump's lawyers missed the deadlines for submission in that case. This was not some activist judge coming down on Trump's team. It was a procedural matter. Trump's neophyte lawyer repeatedly tried to introduce such non-admissible evidence about the first trial. The judge finally told her she was borderline being slapped with a fine and to sit herself down. [Goes to show she needs some more experience, one would expect.] The last case, 83.3m, was to determine payment for defamation, not whether Trump was guilty in the first case. That ship sailed in the last case. He lost. Trump was already guilty of a sexual crime before he got to this level. This case was just about his continued lying about the verdict and defamation of Carroll after being directed to desist from continuing his repetitive lying.

A number of former district attorneys noted today that the number is only a 3x ratio punitive damage matter. Apparently, this is a low amount by that standard and within the parameters that upper courts routinely run as a good call. According to those experts, upper courts sometimes reduce the amount once the punitive damages exceed a 6x ratio. Those same experts noted that nothing in the proceedings stood out as potential total dismissal for cause. Their experiences and assessments point to the 83.3m sailing through any appeal judge as a loss for Trump.

My best guess is Teflon Don isn't so slick anymore. His appearance at the rally tonight was evident that the sting of 83.3 million chapped his ass. He kept quiet for a change.

First off the case should never have been brought to trial. Statutes of limitations were purposely changed just to adjudicate Trump

^^^ Yes, trump and lawyers delayed and missed deadlines and whatnot.


Activist judge = judge who tells defendant to quit saying defaming things against plaintiff in case about defamation. Got it.

Trump has every right to defend himself in a public forum. The case is never adjudicated in a court of law if it wasn’t for a change in statutory limitations. There’s a reason for statutory limitations, memory and factual depiction of the event. You people hate Trump so much that you’re OK with the destruction of our judicial system as long as your brand of justice wins out! SAD

 

[icanhelp1]

Trump’s already been found guilty of assaulting and defaming her.

The preponderance of the evidence doesn’t arrive to that conclusion. Trump cannot get a fair trial in NY PERIOD! you know it and I know it. This was nothing more than a Brett Kavanaugh style character assassination. She was clearly a nut bag but evidence to prove it that was inadmissible due to a judge acting as a steering mechanism.

 

[icanhelp1]

All that “evidence” of voter fraud was in the same pile right?

Courts don’t like the evidence drawn in crayon and finger paint.

Maybe if he paid his lawyers and didn’t sabotage his own case/position he could get competent lawyers who know what evidence is admissible. But he would have to be in his right mind and we know he isn’t.

If the judge acted as a neutral and fair arbiter of the law, just saying.

As far as voter fraud is concerned many judges ruled out many cases on procedural (standing) issues and many failed to conduct evidentiary hearings. Most cases weren’t actually ruled on based on evidence.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

The preponderance of the evidence doesn’t arrive to that conclusion. Trump cannot get a fair trial in NY PERIOD! you know it and I know it. This was nothing more than a Brett Kavanaugh style character assassination. She was clearly a nut bag but evidence to prove it that was inadmissible due to a judge acting as a steering mechanism.

The evidence was strong enough to convince the jury of Donald Trump’s guilt.

 

[icanhelp1]

And Trump is cash poor. It's all tied up in properties.

And he also has the fraud trial to cover if he loses.

The fraud case has zero victims, this case will also be overturned in the appellate court.

 

[icanhelp1]

The evidence was strong enough to convince the jury of Donald Trump’s guilt.

The jury was biased. They’re all Trump hating democrats.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

The fraud case has zero victims, this case will also be overturned in the appellate court.

I know you think the fix is in, but Donald Trump doesn’t have that sort of power. He’s too weak to fight this and win.

 

[coati]

First off the case should never have been brought to trial. Statutes of limitations were purposely changed just to adjudicate Trump.

^^^Another example of a Deplorable describing reality as a conspiracy against their cult leader.

The fantasy world these folks have created on-line has completely engulfed and poisoned their lives.They are killing themselves with lies. This mass psychosis is truly a death cult, led by someone who bases his entire value system on clicks received.

Addiction to social media posting has consequences. Turn off your electronic devices and spend this day in nature.

 

[icanhelp1]

I know you think the fix is in, but Donald Trump doesn’t have that sort of power. He’s too weak to fight this and win.

We’ll see.

 

[icanhelp1]

^^^Another example of a Deplorable describing reality as a conspiracy against their cult leader.

The fantasy world these folks have created on-line has completely engulfed and poisoned their lives.They are killing themselves with lies. This mass psychosis is truly a death cult, led by someone who bases his entire value system on clicks received.

Addiction to social media posting has consequences. Turn off your electronic devices and spend this day in nature.

It’s not about Trump dumbass! Millions of Americans are seeing through this culture of corruption within our justice system. Fair and equal justice for all citizens doesn’t exist. Equal application of the law has been bastardized by democrat demagoguery. Equal protection under the law works if you’re a democrat as evidenced by the DOJ protection bubble that surrounds the Biden crime family.

 

[Bray123]

Trump's main weapon now is to encourage the Meal Team Six Division to issue death threats against anyone who stands up against him.

Several Republican law-makers are saying openly that they backed down in the face of repeated threats against them and their family. The party of insurrection, intimidation and disorder.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

It’s not about Trump dumbass! Millions of Americans are seeing through this culture of corruption within our justice system. Fair and equal justice for all citizens doesn’t exist. Equal application of the law has been bastardized by democrat demagoguery. Equal protection under the law works if you’re a democrat as evidenced by the DOJ protection bubble that surrounds the Biden crime family.

There’s no evidence that President Biden has committed any crimes.

 

[dkovic77]

If the judge acted as a neutral and fair arbiter of the law, just saying.

As far as voter fraud is concerned many judges ruled out many cases on procedural (standing) issues and many failed to conduct evidentiary hearings. Most cases weren’t actually ruled on based on evidence.

Hmmm please do tell expand on these non-neutral acts?

Oh, are judges supposed to bow down to dictators when they are accused of wrong doing and just make everything go away?

Sure seems there are many judges in our nation who don’t think that is the case, and rightfully so.

So when judges don’t just put in the fix for your argument/side, it’s a tragedy of justice? C’mon try harder!

BTW-How did that expert star witness turn out in your quest to ring up Joe?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

The fraud case has zero victims, this case will also be overturned in the appellate court.

On what grounds?

 

[icanhelp1]

There’s no evidence that President Biden has committed any crimes.

There’s tons of evidence, the responsibility of the DOJ is to follow up on available evidence not bury the evidence or allow statutory violations to outrun the statute of limitations.

Hmmm please do tell expand on these non-neutral acts?

Oh, are judges supposed to bow down to dictators when they are accused of wrong doing and just make everything go away?

Sure seems there are many judges in our nation who don’t think that is the case, and rightfully so.

So when judges don’t just put in the fix for your argument/side, it’s a tragedy of justice? C’mon try harder!

BTW-How did that expert star witness turn out in your quest to ring up Joe?

You characterizing Trump as a dictator just supports my opinion of you, your hatred for Trump is not a legal platform but an emotional one. Your lady justice is only blind in one eye.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

There’s tons of evidence, the responsibility of the DOJ is to follow up on available evidence not bury the evidence or allow statutory violations to outrun the statute of limitations.

You characterizing Trump as a dictator just supports my opinion of you, your hatred for Trump is not a legal platform but an emotional one. Your lady justice is only blind in one eye.

Where can we see this evidence?

 

[Bn2f]

Your lady justice is only blind in one eye.

Oh, mama! Fascinating the brain farts that pass as logic in the minds of Deplorables. I’ll let others tear down your false reasoning, I just wanna ask: Which eye is Lady Justice blind in? Like, um, she’s completely blindfolded. . The blindfold analogy is that she actually can see, but for the purpose of fairness and justice, well, never mind.
Please, do continue.

 

[dkovic77]

There’s tons of evidence, the responsibility of the DOJ is to follow up on available evidence not bury the evidence or allow statutory violations to outrun the statute of limitations.

You characterizing Trump as a dictator just supports my opinion of you, your hatred for Trump is not a legal platform but an emotional one. Your lady justice is only blind in one eye.

Where can we see this evidence?

In his mind since no one has seen it.