HA's advice is good but tis better to know than to worry unnecessarily.
^^^The gun guru pronounces, "No harm, no foul", as if the "facts" don't include absence of appropriate PPE for that type of weapon test, and as if the "facts" don't include acting like an immature jerk when he was conducting the test.
Of course. Shitty things can happen when driving too...that's why there's seatbelts and airbags.
If you search the Kentucky guy's youtube, you'll see videos on how to properly do destructive testing.
Literally in that clip the guy is wearing safety glasses only. So if that is "properly", then properly results in higher risk of flying hot metal aimed at your unguarded face and neck.
Strange how you and your cohorts are so enthralled by that clip. You have decided that he was, in turn, careless and wasteful. I can even concede that you are right but the questions that come to me are;
Geezus you really are a classic dumb fuck.
Why is that?
Because you were clearly unable to understand 2 very simple and clear sentences and posted absolute horseshit in response.
Good bye, I'm not playing your stupid game.
I'm afraid that you're the stupid one here. You're inability to answer a simple question points in that direction.
You are not now nor have you ever been an ally. The fact is you are making such a big stink over my saying that I find destructive tests like that stupid and that I don't have the money to destroy firearms like that. I don't care if he is willing to ruin a multi-thousand dollar gun, no matter how fucking stupid it is. I never said anyone should intervene, let alone the government. So try to pay attention ya fucking drone.
TH?
