LLCox
fu247365.org
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2019
- Posts
- 9,376
No. I do not.
Convicted felon ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. I do not.
I do not know where droolin was hoping to go by asking me that question, but no, no convictions.Convicted felon ?
Excellent news because someone as unstable as you should not be allowed to own firearms.No. I do not.
You're a liberal so of course you have no solid convictions, no liberal ever does.I do not know where droolin was hoping to go by asking me that question, but no, no convictions.
No. Quite the opposite.Excellent news because someone as unstable as you should not be allowed to own firearms.
Haha. The question related to felony convictions. I’m not going to rail on you over making this mistake. It’s really kind of funny.You're a liberal so of course you have no solid convictions, no liberal ever does.
I knew exactly what I meant when i posted that. Convictions has 2 meanings and I meant the one about having strong beliefs. I believe you believe what you are told to believe and nothing more.Haha. The question related to felony convictions. I’m not going to rail on you over making this mistake. It’s really kind of funny.
You, of all people, should know that I have very strong convictions and lay them out constantly.
You think that I come here and spout rhetoric that is ingrained in me from what type of indoctrination? That I’m repeating stuff from a script? Wow! Ok.I knew exactly what I meant when i posted that. Convictions has 2 meanings and I meant the one about having strong beliefs. I believe you believe what you are told to believe and nothing more.
Why would your neighbors be out to get you? Or the government for that matter? People that own guns for self defense own them against home invaders, tweekers, and the like. Not for some stupid neighbor dispute.No. Quite the opposite.
I’m a fact based person. I laid out just yesterday the dangers of owning a gun in one’s home. I love my family. I have no unwarranted fear of my neighbors or feelings that my government is coming to get me by means of knocking on my door.
In 2021 there were 70,000+ deaths due to synthetic opioids (primarily Fentanyl).
In 2021 there were 70,000+ deaths due to synthetic opioids (primarily Fentanyl).
Hey, son?If there were this, people might learn how to think more and condemn less:
There are only an estimated 44 million of them in the US, so yeah, America’s most popular rifle is “unusual.” How could SCOTUS possibly find they fit the common use threshold?It's not surprising that the above post would come from Rory.
First of all it was posted as if we in the firearm community were ignorant of the ruling, we aren't.
As a matter of fact the ruling was expected and, actually, celebrated. It sets up a case that the Supreme Court is going to hear, and rule on. Meaning that the 'fat lady' hasn't sung yet. As usual, Rory ejaculates prematurely.
If anyone bothers to read the judge's ruling you'll find a fatal flaw. He concluded that AR's are "unusual and dangerous." While all of us can concede that ALL firearms are dangerous, the notion that a design that is in the hands of millions of people is unusual is ludicrous. Further, the judge concludes that AR's are 'weapons of war.' A finding that is conflict with US v Miller (1939) in which the court found that a weapon not suitable for war is not covered by the 2nd.
Myopia comes to mind.There are only an estimated 44 million of them in the US, so yeah, America’s most popular rifle is “unusual.” How could SCOTUS possibly find they fit the common use threshold?