US Court pause Biden officials' social media restrictions

[BeatMan]

A US appeals court on Friday temporarily blocked a lower court order limiting President Joe Biden administration officials' communications with social media companies.

The ruling in New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals paused an order by US District Judge Terry Doughty in Monroe, Louisiana that found that officials' efforts to limit the spread of posts they considered to be misinformation violated the right to free speech.

The Department of Justice appealed his order.

Friday's ruling means that Biden's administration is not bound by Doughty's order until the appeal is considered. The 5th Circuit Court said it would be heard as soon as possible by a panel of three judges.

The panel will decide whether to keep the order on hold or allow it to go into effect during deliberations.

https://www.dw.com/en/us-court-pause-biden-officials-social-media-restrictions/a-66240533

 

[HisArpy]

Typical. The court will maintain the status quo until the appeal is heard. At which point they will rubber stamp the administration's version of "truth."

 

[Lazaran]

Typical. The court will maintain the status quo until the appeal is heard. At which point they will rubber stamp the administration's version of "truth."

•
Maybe this will help the “counselor”.

“In its request that the 5th Circuit issue a stay, administration lawyers said there has been no evidence of threats by the administration. “The district court identified no evidence suggesting that a threat accompanied any request for the removal of content. Indeed, the order denying the stay — presumably highlighting the ostensibly strongest evidence — referred to ‘a series of public media statements,’” the administration said.”

Hope that ^ helps.

Harpy

 

[Rightguide]

Typical. The court will maintain the status quo until the appeal is heard. At which point they will rubber stamp the administration's version of "truth."

Hopefully not. The administration is clearly in violation of the First Amendment.

 

[Lazaran]

•
“Right”guide is “clearly” an idiot:

“In its request that the 5th Circuit issue a stay, administration lawyers said there has been no evidence of threats by the administration. “The district court identified no evidence suggesting that a threat accompanied any request for the removal of content. Indeed, the order denying the stay — presumably highlighting the ostensibly strongest evidence — referred to ‘a series of public media statements,’” the administration said.”

“Right”guide

 

[HisArpy]

Hopefully not. The administration is clearly in violation of the First Amendment.

No one in the administration cares. In fact they're all in favor of it.

Few in the public care. In fact, most of them are so fucked in the head they think this is nothing more than a Republican campaign message from Trump.

Until the people wake the fuck up, we're only going to get more of what we've been getting because the "Deep State" is really the "Orwellian State."

 

[jaF0]

Supreme Court pauses order curbing Biden administration efforts to block social media posts​

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/ip3/abcnews.go.com.icoABC|4 hours ago
The Supreme Court has temporarily blocked enforcement of a lower court order curbing Biden administration efforts to combat controversial social media posts


Scrotes one-up the Fifth.

 

[Lazaran]

Supreme Court pauses order curbing Biden administration efforts to block social media posts​

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/ip3/abcnews.go.com.icoABC|4 hours ago
The Supreme Court has temporarily blocked enforcement of a lower court order curbing Biden administration efforts to combat controversial social media posts


Scrotes one-up the Fifth.

That ^ after “ the Fifth” completely GUTTED a Drumpf appointed judge’s lower court order.

 

[jaF0]

More confused.

https://www.courthousenews.com/supr...-house-communication-with-social-media-firms/

 

[HisArpy]

Supreme Court pauses order curbing Biden administration efforts to block social media posts​

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/ip3/abcnews.go.com.icoABC|4 hours ago
The Supreme Court has temporarily blocked enforcement of a lower court order curbing Biden administration efforts to combat controversial social media posts


Scrotes one-up the Fifth.

It's a temporary procedural move done to give them time to look into whether they'll grant cert or not. This is normal and it's to preserve the status quo. It doesn't reach to the merits of the case at all.