Another reason not to trust what you hear on Fox News.

[Dribble]

Jesus Fucking Christ. We really do need a more effective way of keeping children out of an adult forum

 

[Dorc]

you ruin a fairly articulate comment. And while you point out my grammatical error you can’t spell. Good one.

Is Stupider (Stupidest) a Word? | Grammarly​

Stupider is the comparative form of the adjective stupid.Because stupid is a two-syllable word, its comparative form can be created either by adding the suffix "-er" or by using more.; The same goes for the superlative form of stupid.It can be either the stupidest or the most stupid.; Stupid and its related word forms are considered very rude and insulting in some situations.

 

[lovecraft68]

I don't trust anything I hear on any mainstream news network. They no longer report news, they take a piece of a story and TELL you how to feel about it, and if you don't agree you're one of them(wingnut or snowflake depending on the network)

Not that I already didn't feel this way for some time, but when I saw the clip of Chris Hayes ranting hysterically that if you care about gas and food prices you're anti-democracy it really drove home why I no longer watch any of it.

There's some clown on Twitter "The Palmer Report" who said any one who cares about inflation is a fascist because they care more about that than Jan 6th.

Let's dissect this. First off, people are capable of being concerned over more than one thing. Second, yes, the audacity for working class people to be afraid they can't afford food or heat for their kids. Lastly, the irony of a person who calls everyone a fascist is the same person telling you what you can be concerned about.

Its all lies, hate and fear mongering and this forum is a perfect example of the insanity it creates.

 

[DeluxAuto]

you ruin a fairly articulate comment. And while you point out my grammatical error you can’t spell. Good one.

I don't care if a moron thinks I'm articulate or not. And if you think I had a spelling error, you're an even bigger moron than previously pointed out.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

It’s a forum for sharing beliefs on many topics. Open another box of Kleenex.

This is a political forum, and while politics may delve into matters that contain religion, there is no expectation for a person of faith to have that faith '"respected". Or to put it more succinctly take your fucking fake god bullshit elsewhere.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

I don't trust anything I hear on any mainstream news network.

Exactly, just look at FoxNews and the Gold Star family, which Fox claimed they had to pay $60K to have the body flown back!! Which turns out to be total bullshit!!

 

[butters]

after complaints from both the family and other Marines, fox finally issues an apology...on CNN. anyone know if they also addressed that on their own channel?

Fox News conceded on Saturday it published a false story last month that claimed a Gold Star family had to pay tens of thousands of dollars to ship their relative home from Afghanistan without help from the U.S. government. In reality, the family paid nothing. “The now unpublished story has been addressed internally and we sincerely apologize to the Gee family,” a spokesperson said in a statement to CNN

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/f...&cvid=93c57dbf96c940f585ec36ba35f447b8&ei=170

 

[Comshaw]

Or CNN, or...

Okay, you said it, you prove it. I supplied the story and analysis that showed Fox screwed the pooch. How about you putting up one instance of CNN (since that's the one you named) reporting a story that was in error, then refusing to retract it. Go on, let's see it...IF YOU CAN.


Comshaw

 

[icanhelp1]

 

[massageguy1]

Obvious slanted coverage, specifically of President Obama. Funneling debate questions to Hillary through Brazille...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies

 

[Comshaw]

Obvious slanted coverage, specifically of President Obama. Funneling debate questions to Hillary through Brazille...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies

did you actually read my post? this part especially:

As I noted in my OP, you can slant the news by how you report it without lying about the facts of it.

I acknowledge that EVERY news organization will slant the news, while pointing out it can be done without ignoring the facts. Which isn't what Fox did. They reported a story that was false and refused to retract it. I did just read an article where they finally did and apologized to the family of the fallen soldier. Finally.

Your three word repudiation of my post insinuated that CNN and all news organizations do the same thing as what Fox did. When I challenged you on it, what do you produce as evidence? An article that says the news agency produce slanted coverage. No shit. I think I said that. What you didn't do and I don't think can do is show where CNN did exactly what Fox did, IE; post a lase story and refuse to retract it.
So now that you've tried the red herring, why not buck up and prove your point? Show me proof CNN did what Fox did. IF YOU CAN.


Comshaw

 

[Bray123]

 

[massageguy1]

did you actually read my post? this part especially:

I acknowledge that EVERY news organization will slant the news, while pointing out it can be done without ignoring the facts. Which isn't what Fox did. They reported a story that was false and refused to retract it. I did just read an article where they finally did and apologized to the family of the fallen soldier. Finally.

Your three word repudiation of my post insinuated that CNN and all news organizations do the same thing as what Fox did. When I challenged you on it, what do you produce as evidence? An article that says the news agency produce slanted coverage. No shit. I think I said that. What you didn't do and I don't think can do is show where CNN did exactly what Fox did, IE; post a lase story and refuse to retract it.
So now that you've tried the red herring, why not buck up and prove your point? Show me proof CNN did what Fox did. IF YOU CAN.


Comshaw

Looks like you didn't read my reply or check the link, either. If you look past bias, you can see specific issues cited, not just bias.

 

[jaF0]

Looks like you didn't read my reply

Does anybody?

 

[dkovic77]

after complaints from both the family and other Marines, fox finally issues an apology...on CNN. anyone know if they also addressed that on their own channel?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/f...&cvid=93c57dbf96c940f585ec36ba35f447b8&ei=170

Facts be damned! Treading on military families be damned. MAGA folks still believe it all, even when the propaganda is shown to them.

So they aren’t for law and order. They aren’t for military families. They aren’t for truth.

Dems will thank you in advance for all the victories in 2024. Photos from prison will find candidates for years….

Obvious slanted coverage, specifically of President Obama. Funneling debate questions to Hillary through Brazille...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN_controversies

There are a few things listed there but the never ending list for the propaganda network is miles beyond what is listed for CNN.

So, don’t be so excited folks haven’t checked out your “damning” evidence. The stack against the entertainment channels propaganda is overwhelming. At least CNN is a news network. The other is not, and self admitted in court by their lawyers.

So let’s set aside this argument and just decide that actual sources of new (hear that wrong guide) are where we need to be.

Basing your decisions on bogus information just leaves you with little support. But that’s why the losses keep happening. The American public sees through the garbage and it will be four losses in a row in 2024.

Keep it up and the Dems won’t have to work as hard since the ‘pubs just work against themselves.

 

[Comshaw]

Looks like you didn't read my reply or check the link, either. If you look past bias, you can see specific issues cited, not just bias.

I read the ENTIRE link. However it appears you can't read with comprehension so I won't waste any more of my time.

TA

Comshaw

 

[massageguy1]

Facts be damned! Treading on military families be damned. MAGA folks still believe it all, even when the propaganda is shown to them.

So they aren’t for law and order. They aren’t for military families. They aren’t for truth.

Dems will thank you in advance for all the victories in 2024. Photos from prison will find candidates for years….

There are a few things listed there but the never ending list for the propaganda network is miles beyond what is listed for CNN.

So, don’t be so excited folks haven’t checked out your “damning” evidence. The stack against the entertainment channels propaganda is overwhelming. At least CNN is a news network. The other is not, and self admitted in court by their lawyers.

So let’s set aside this argument and just decide that actual sources of new (hear that wrong guide) are where we need to be.

Basing your decisions on bogus information just leaves you with little support. But that’s why the losses keep happening. The American public sees through the garbage and it will be four losses in a row in 2024.

Keep it up and the Dems won’t have to work as hard since the ‘pubs just work against themselves.

I get most of my news from NPR and the BBC. Don't mistake me for a fan of Fox.

It's just that I'm skeptical, in general

 

[dkovic77]

I get most of my news from NPR and the BBC. Don't mistake me for a fan of Fox.

It's just that I'm skeptical, in general

Skeptical is good, but that entertainment propaganda network… MAGA folks should just watch TMZ. Just as legit.

And they can bow out of the discussion since they aren’t providing anything of valid substance.

 

[massageguy1]

Skeptical is good, but that entertainment propaganda network… MAGA folks should just watch TMZ. Just as legit.

And they can bow out of the discussion since they aren’t providing anything of valid substance.

How thoughtful of you to act as gatekeeper for opinion

 

[PaxNurgle]

New York Times ran interference for Hitler, lied and buried the truth about the* HOLOCAUST * but they seem to be doing OK.

Holy fuck...now Hisarpy's a Holocaust denier as well. Dude, is it just me, or are you getting scummier and scummier with each and every post??

 

[dkovic77]

How thoughtful of you to act as gatekeeper for opinion

Well since the right is looking to get us back to the days that only landowning white males can vote, and the entertainment propaganda network is twisting the facts, calling it news, to get folks down to that garden path…

Yeah.. it’s past opinion at that point and into the land of being criminal.

It’s a “fun” smokescreen everytime they talk about same day voting. Pure signal they just want salaried employees to vote since hourly folks have the most difficulty getting time off to vote.

The same goes for the notation of the 25 to vote offer from candidate Vivek. Since those who are 18-25 overwhelming vote Democratic, when they do vote…that isn’t difficult to see the real reason there.

The news should be a source of honest information (gathered with journalistic integrity) to help inform the public so they can vote as they see fit- but the right twists it so much it can’t be called news and it’s just propaganda. The folks at the fix is in propaganda have stated many times in court that their programming is not news and no one should take it as such. (wow) Yet, here we are with a bunch of small brains still glued to it like it’s mother’s milk and trying convince others of their garbage- so much so we have internet spin-offs that the deplorables love to “source” as if they are the gospel.

So yeah, we are way past opinion.

 

[massageguy1]

'They're trying to put y'all back in chains!'

- Joe Biden

 

[Pad_Foot]

CNN has gone back to balanced news so the “other side” gets to air their opinion as if it’s equal in merit.

This caused problems pre Trump

He’s still with us. His people are on CNN

 

[bhurry]

I get most of my news from NPR and the BBC. Don't mistake me for a fan of Fox.

It's just that I'm skeptical, in general

your problem

 

[massageguy1]

Very not