Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, it's certainly true that non-con stories rarely explore the victim's traumatic response to being betrayed by their own body.
Many people here seem to have an extreme attitude about what non-con is.
Secretive voyeurism and forced feminization could also be considered non-con in the sense that they’re non-consensual, but then again, we have other categories for those kinks.
Then there’s also the proliferation of instances in other categories in which a character doesn’t ask for permission or give adequate time for the recipient to back out before trying a particular act, but the recipient is completely fine with it anyway.
A lot of my writing strays into non-con territory, and I often dip into the category when reading too. I back out of stories that give off rape-glorification vibes, but there is a lot of eroticism in being forced to endure what we would never dare in reality.
So, I feel like I've learned a lot about cuckolding and humiliation kink from NTH in the past few months. And, I've said this before, but I see a lot of similarity between those stories and nonconsent stories. Guys who want to fantasize about being humiliated and losing their wives to better men are looking for stories that treat that as real, to imagine it being real. But the vast majority do not want it to really be real. If they want it in their real life at all, they want to role play it.The issue is justifying an actual rape kink by adding some crap about the woman (and it’s always a woman) cumming, or saying thank you afterwards. That’s just bullshit.
If you want to play rape games, knock yourself out. I have done incest roleplay and I can tell the difference between that and real incest. But if you want to write a realistic rape (which is a violent act even if no hitting is involved) and then say the woman enjoyed it, you have a tenuous grip on reality.
Em
In fiction it feels similar, but this is a dangerous attitude to apply to real life, because what if the recipient didn't want it and doesn't give the retrospective consent?If they are OK with it. Then that’s consent, albeit retrospectively.
Letters & Transcripts: I already wrote a Letter format story but since it was incest themed it went there.
Lol.I could never write Gay male, Transgender, or cross dressing.
As a straight CIS male, I don't know that I'd be able to capture those kinds of tales honestly.
If it’s a realistic depiction of an actual rape, with some crappy post hoc justification that she actually enjoyed it. Then I couldn’t care less the gender of the author. It’s bullshit and trying to pretend that you don’t get off on the idea of destroying another human being physically and emotionally.I'm curious, Em, if you feel differently about noncon stories written by women than those written by men?
I was taking about fiction. IRL, no woman is going to be raped and afterwards say “wow I really got off on that” that’s just rapist apologia.In fiction it feels similar, but this is a dangerous attitude to apply to real life, because what if the recipient didn't want it and doesn't give the retrospective consent?
Certainly if you don't feel it, you shouldn't write it (because it will likely show) but I disagree with any absolution with this premise.I could never write Gay male, Transgender, or cross dressing.
As a straight CIS male, I don't know that I'd be able to capture those kinds of tales honestly.
Certainly if you don't feel it, you shouldn't write it (because it will likely show) but I disagree with any absolution with this premise.
Non-con is like other muddled categories where those in less mainstream classifications often must reside along side the fetishists.It's not difficult at all to understand. Many people in general are quite horrified by this category, it falls into a very dark taboo whether fantasy/fictional or otherwise, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that. Personal preference is just that... what some find fascinating others wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole. Of all categories most people tend to avoid, I don't find it hard to understand the psychological aspect of many wanting to steer clear of NC/R all together.
Cause you wrote it beautifully. Then, as you say, you were interested and did some research.It's gotten a very nice reception so far, and I've yet to get the complaint "it's not REAL BDSM."
I hope you didn't feel any of it was personal.If you scroll a bit, you'll see that I changed my stance on this slightly, at least when it comes to gay male stories.
Because I do agree, it's just a matter of willpower, research and effort.
But I also agree we need to FEEL it to make it work, and not just write it to somehow prove we can.
My newest story has some BDSM elements in it; something I've never personally delved into, have zero experience with.
But I was inspired by a particular idea and, with much help from a friend far more familiar with the subject, set out to write a version that was as honest to my style and views as I could make it.
Here's my thing, so what if they did?It's gotten a very nice reception so far, and I've yet to get the complaint "it's not REAL BDSM."
I hope you didn't feel any of it was personal.
Here's my thing, so what if they did?
Non-con is like other muddled categories where those in less mainstream classifications often must reside along side the fetishists.
It's a matter of "agreement of (role) play" where the two participants are operating off an agreed upon script but a ill-pairing can lead to unfulfilling experiences or down right scary interactions (it's a spectrum, the double edge sword of non-con being it's driver and it's deadly dagger.)
Interracial has similar agreed scripts issues where you have a large portion of the cat. wanting simple (lacking) representation of themselves and their sex lives and fetishists celebrating more the physical traits, old tropes about the naughtiness/impurity of the act, essentially in substitution of the person.
Such incongruence exists in even mundane day to day interactions and couplings so surely it has plenty of examples here.
It can be a bit of a tightrope walk finding someone who celebrates your inherent X quality but treats it as a wonderful enrichment to the whole of who you are.
Non-con is more of a car wreck b/c the nature of human beings to be drawn to violence/fear inducing disaster and its higher stakes when scripts are mismatched.
An author who writes well those conflicts and balancings I find to be particularly skilled, no matter the category.
There are a few categories that I don't touch because I just don't feel moved in that directionMy list is not comprehensive (e.g. Reviews & Essays is absent as are others).
What about you?
Em
BTW, were would a prostitution story go on Lit?
Every time the subject of categories come up, I suggest that there should be a Sex Work category.
I like the idea but I can only imagine the new breed of trolls.I put my story The Deal With Lara, about an older gentleman who meets and winds up creating omline content with a young sex worker in Erotic Couplings because basically it was the only category for it really.
It did well. But yeah, a specific Sex Worker category would be a nice place to put those more specific type stories.
This part is exciting as a piece of writing, but then I stopped because, as a man writing, the next part is a real minefield to navigate. Every further sentence I write, I'm thinking about 'what does this sentence say about me' and 'what does my heroines next action say about my attitude to women'. I could of course bin it and goes down the old 'woman forces man' route, but I'm not absolutely convinced that's going to lead to a raft of other problems.