LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Why does anyone NEED an assault rifle?

Rightguide said:
Most of the left is factually clueless about guns and gun terminology. They invent their own politically charged terms to scare the ignorant in society.
Click to expand...

I think this the right on target. Most anti-gun propagandists don't really know anything about the subject they're so vehemently against.

Guns are simple machines; you put the bullets in, aim, and pull the trigger. The number of bullets capable of being loaded into the gun is irrelevant since one bullet is enough to cause death or harm if the gun is misused. Whether a gun is semi-auto or a revolver is irrelevant because one bullet is enough to cause death or harm if the gun is misused.

Yet these are the things the anti-gun propagandists focus on. The question is why?

The answer is that they, and their adoring fans are clueless. They claim that "assault weapons" are dangerous. The truth is, every gun is dangerous so an "assault weapon" isn't any more dangerous than usual. They claim that "assault weapons" can shoot more bullets quicker, but any semi-automatic rifle can shoot just as quickly. They claim that "assault weapons" are high powered, yet most shoot a .22 caliber bullet.

The facts aren't in support of their arguments but the anti-gun propagandists make those arguments anyway because they, and their sycophants, are clueless about the truth.
 
RobDownSouth said:
Ask and ye shall receive.
https://i.imgur.com/HrEmwCq.pngThe definition from the document image:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190904213732if_/http://031d26d.namesecurehost.com/gunfax/fstcp67.jpg
Boom Mic Drop!
Click to expand...
That isn't a US Army Field Manual covering US Army small arms, and besides the definition presented is not characteristic of the AR-15, or any other semi-automatic rifle in common use in the US. So the term "Assault Rifle" used by the media to describe AR-15s or other semi-automatic rifles in common use, is a made-up propaganda term. You dropped your mike on your shoe.:rolleyes:
 
Rightguide said:
Most of the left is factually clueless about guns and gun terminology. They invent their own politically charged terms to scare the ignorant in society.
Click to expand...
EXACTLY RIGHT! Then they get pissy when you use correct terminology and say you know what I meant. I usually say that's not the problem, but do YOU know what you meant?
 
Biggest issue with the anti gun crowd is they treat guns in a very strange and unique way. In no other case do they blame the existence and access to the object or weapon used to kill people, nor do they care about other things that kill a lot more people. Cars kill a lot more people than guns? Not an issue. Crazy person stabs a dozen people at a public place? Knives aren't the problem. It's only when guns are involved that suddenly the tool used and number of lives lost becomes important.
 
I haven't seen a post anywhere about George Alvarez that ran into 18 people and killed 8 migrants, some Venezuelans, waiting in front of migrant shelter. He was reported to be cursing them and calling them invaders. Apparently mass killings only count if you use a gun.
 
TrailerHitch said:
I haven't seen a post anywhere about George Alvarez that ran into 18 people and killed 8 migrants, some Venezuelans, waiting in front of migrant shelter. He was reported to be cursing them and calling them invaders. Apparently mass killings only count if you use a gun.
Click to expand...
Exactly. Number of people killed and what they were killed by means nothing. Unless it involves guns, then it becomes everything.
 
TastySuckToy said:
Biggest issue with the anti gun crowd is they treat guns in a very strange and unique way. In no other case do they blame the existence and access to the object or weapon used to kill people, nor do they care about other things that kill a lot more people. Cars kill a lot more people than guns? Not an issue. Crazy person stabs a dozen people at a public place? Knives aren't the problem. It's only when guns are involved that suddenly the tool used and number of lives lost becomes important.
Click to expand...
Part of the reason I support mass transit is because of all the people killed by cars. Anything that reduces the number of people driving saves lives.
 
TastySuckToy said:
Biggest issue with the anti gun crowd is they treat guns in a very strange and unique way. In no other case do they blame the existence and access to the object or weapon used to kill people, nor do they care about other things that kill a lot more people. Cars kill a lot more people than guns? Not an issue. Crazy person stabs a dozen people at a public place? Knives aren't the problem. It's only when guns are involved that suddenly the tool used and number of lives lost becomes important.
Click to expand...
Because their agenda is gun control/gun confiscation.:)
 
TastySuckToy said:
Gun violence must be extremely low in those examples then. Why doesn't the anti gun crowd point to such examples as proof strict gun control is a good thing?
Click to expand...
Because they don't want to let out of the bag their true affection for Communism.
 
Funny Bass Pro Shop, Cabella's Nation Wide sporting goods do not stock so-called Assult Weapons!

Made up names by ID10Ts that know nothing about Firearms!
 
HisArpy said:
I think this the right on target. Most anti-gun propagandists don't really know anything about the subject they're so vehemently against.

Guns are simple machines; you put the bullets in, aim, and pull the trigger. The number of bullets capable of being loaded into the gun is irrelevant since one bullet is enough to cause death or harm if the gun is misused. Whether a gun is semi-auto or a revolver is irrelevant because one bullet is enough to cause death or harm if the gun is misused.

Yet these are the things the anti-gun propagandists focus on. The question is why?

The answer is that they, and their adoring fans are clueless. They claim that "assault weapons" are dangerous. The truth is, every gun is dangerous so an "assault weapon" isn't any more dangerous than usual. They claim that "assault weapons" can shoot more bullets quicker, but any semi-automatic rifle can shoot just as quickly. They claim that "assault weapons" are high powered, yet most shoot a .22 caliber bullet.

The facts aren't in support of their arguments but the anti-gun propagandists make those arguments anyway because they, and their sycophants, are clueless about the truth.
Click to expand...
Timmy, maybe you could man-splain to your rationalizations to the father of the five year old who got his fucking face blown off by one of your semiautomatic gun companions last week.
 
TrailerHitch said:
I haven't seen a post anywhere about George Alvarez that ran into 18 people and killed 8 migrants, some Venezuelans, waiting in front of migrant shelter. He was reported to be cursing them and calling them invaders. Apparently mass killings only count if you use a gun.
Click to expand...
I'm sure he's every bit the adherent of White Victimhood as the Allen Texas shooter was, and as you currently are. You and your White Supremacist "elk" are a cancer on society.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

AG31
Is there a way to fight discrimination without encouraging more identity politics?
2
Replies
44
Views
435
oryginalny
O
MythicMind
Western Civilization Depends on a Commitment to Democracy
Replies
15
Views
299
Celand
Celand
SkyBubble
The Pillars of Modern American Conservatism
Replies
7
Views
202
SkyBubble
SkyBubble
nowisthetime
Respect Nurses Always
2
Replies
37
Views
483
spacemanx001
spacemanx001
JohnEngelman
The Problems and Possibilities of Artificial Intelligenc
2 3 4
Replies
92
Views
839
Rightguide
Rightguide
Back
Top